1 / 27

ACEC Indiana Environmental Business Conference

ACEC Indiana Environmental Business Conference. Bruno Pigott Assistant Commissioner Office of Water Quality Indiana Department of Environmental Management. Agenda. OWQ Past Accomplishments OWQ Current Issues Nutrients CSO Program General Permits Electronic Reporting 316a Guidance

kohana
Download Presentation

ACEC Indiana Environmental Business Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ACEC IndianaEnvironmental Business Conference Bruno Pigott Assistant Commissioner Office of Water Quality Indiana Department of Environmental Management

  2. Agenda • OWQ Past Accomplishments • OWQ Current Issues • Nutrients • CSO Program • General Permits • Electronic Reporting • 316a Guidance • New EPA Steam Electric ELG • Revised Total Coliform Rule

  3. Best in NPDES Permitting

  4. Permits--Percent of Statutory Days

  5. Indiana Combined Sewer Overflow Status

  6. Phosphorus Rulemaking • EPA requirement. • IDEM held stakeholder meetings in 2012. • 2013 IDEM has held internal meetings to discuss: • How the standard would affect IDEM assessment and listing methodology • Applicability of the standard • Implementation

  7. Combined Sewer Program Focus • Transitioning from review and approval of plans to compliance review. • Challenge: How to determine whether a fully implemented plan meets the level of control. • New CSO DMRs. • IDEM staff are happy to work with communities.

  8. General Permit Update • EPA told IDEM to change General Permit issuance. • Currently: Rules establish General Permits. • Future: General Permits will be issued by IDEM. • IDEM is drafting five General Permits: • Hydrostatic Testing Water • Sand and Gravel • Noncontact Cooling Water • Petroleum Products Terminals • Ground Water Petroleum Remediation Systems

  9. General Permit Update • Status: • Permits have been drafted. • IDEM has attempted to simplify the structure of these permits. • Permits have been sent to EPA for review • IDEM will meet with stakeholders to discuss template and permits.

  10. NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule • Requirements • Permit holders to submit the following electronically: • DMRs • General Permit NOIs, NOTs, No Exposure Exclusions • SSO or bypass events • Pretreatment Reports • CAFO Annual Reports • Annual Reports from biosolid generators • MS4 Annual Reports

  11. NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule • Time Frames • One year from effective date: • 90% of DMRs • 90% of General Permit NOIs • Two years from the effective date: • 90% of all other reports

  12. NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule • States’ Activity • 24 States have a working version of electronic DMR. • 10 States have a system planned. • 8 States have plans for an electronic NOI • Ohio claims 99% electronic reporting rate.

  13. NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule • Indiana • Using NetDMR software for DMR submission • Compliance staff are conducting outreach to permit holders • IDEM TEMPO system is capable of receiving Rule 6 NOIs and Rule 5 is being designed. • 90 facilities currently enrolled in NetDMR

  14. NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule • Rule Timing • Published in Federal Register July 30, 2013 • Comment Period Closes October 28, 2013 • Final Rule Projected June, 2014

  15. 316a Variance for Thermal Limits • Temperature limits on wastewater discharges. • 27 Power Plants • Steel Mills • Other facilities • Section 316a of the Clean Water Act: variance from thermal effluent limits. • Requirements: • Demonstrate that a different limit will assure protection and propogation of a balanced, indigenous population of shellfish, fish, and wildlife. • Permit holder conducts studies to make demonstration.

  16. 316a Variance for Thermal Limits • IDEM has drafted guidance for conducting studies. • Goal: • Provide permit holders clear guidelines for conducting studies. • Provide IDEM with adequate information to establish alternate limits • Once approved internally, IDEM will share with stakeholders.

  17. Steam Electric ELG • EPA first established Steam Electric Power Generating effluent guidelines in 1974. • Guidelines are used in development of NPDES permits for power plants that use nuclear or fossil fuels to generate power.

  18. Steam Electric ELG • 2009 EPA review of discharges from steam electric power facilities. • EPA evaluated wastewaters from: • FGD systems • Fly Ash and Bottom Ash handling • Coal Pile Runoff • Condenser Cooling • Equipment Cleaning • Leachate from Landfills and Impoundments

  19. Steam Electric ELG • FGD: Wet Flue Gas Desulferization is used to remove fly ash and sulfur dioxide from power plants. • FGD wastewater contains metals, chloride, TDS, TSS • Treatment methods can include settling ponds, chemical precipitation, and biological treatment.

  20. Steam Electric ELG • Fly Ash and Bottom Handling Ash • Wet handling systems sluice fly ash to a surface impoundment for settling. • Some recycling • Newer plants operate dry fly ash handling. Fly ash is stored and sold for beneficial reuse or landfilled.

  21. Steam Electric ELG • New or added requirements for: • Flue gas desulferization • Fly ash • Bottom ash • Flue gas mercury control • Gasification of fuels such as coal and coke. • EPA is considering several options and has identified four preferred options.

  22. Steam Electric ELG • Timeframes: • Rule published June 7, 2013. • Comment period ends September 20, 2013. • EPA is under a consent decree to take final action by May 22, 2014.

  23. Revised Total Coliform Rule • 1989 EPA established the Total Coliform Rule • Required testing for Total Coliform by water systems. • Detection of total coliform requires repeat sampling within 24 hours. • Detection of total coliform requires testing for fecal/E.coli • Public notice and Boil Water Advisory for fecal. • Public notification if

  24. Revised Total Coliform Rule • New rule: • Establishes a MCLG of 0 for E.coli. • Eliminates MCLG and MCL for total coliform and replaces with a treatment technique • Total coliforms are an indicator of a potential pathway for contamination of the distribution system. • PWS with Total Coliform hits would conduct an assessment of the sanitary system to determine whether defects exist and then correct them.

  25. Revised Total Coliform Rule • New Rule Requirements: • Notification • Eliminated for Total Coliform hits only • Required when an E.coli MCL violation occurs or • When a PWS fails to conduct an assessment and perform corrective action when Total Coliform hit.

  26. Revised Total Coliform Rule • Logic of this approach: • Total Coliforms are not in themselves a health threat, therefore a ‘find and fix’ approach will help systems ensure potential problems are addressed. • Timeframe: • PWS must comply with this rule beginning April 1, 2016.

  27. Questions? Bruno Pigott Assistant Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management 317-233-2550 bpigott@idem.in.gov

More Related