250 likes | 359 Views
Strain Release Along the Northern Costa Rica Seismogenic Zone. Susan Y. Schwartz Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences UC Santa Cruz. Modes of Strain Release. 1950 M~7.7. Costa Rica Subduction Zone-Instrumenting the Plate Boundary with a Seismic, GPS and Fluid Flow Network
E N D
Strain Release Along the Northern Costa Rica Seismogenic Zone Susan Y. Schwartz Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences UC Santa Cruz
Costa Rica Subduction Zone-Instrumenting thePlate Boundary with a Seismic, GPS and Fluid Flow Network Collaborators: Tim Dixon, LeRoy Dorman, Kevin Brown, Marino Protti, Victor Gonzales, Heather DeShon, Edmundo Norabuena, Andy Newman, Sue Bilek, Ernst Flueh
EPR interface seismicity: 17-28 km CNS interface seismicity:12-26 km shallower dip
0 20 40 60 80 100 % Locked
Up-dip limit of seismogenic zone is defined by shallowest geodetic locking and is consistent with models of thermal control (100-150o C) Plate boundary earthquakes begin deeper than start of seismogenic zone Plate boundary earthquakes terminate shallower than continental Moho and 350 C isotherm Thermal Modeling by Spinelli and Saffer ( 2004) 300o C isotherm from Harris and Wang (2002)
Implications Locked portion of plate boundary is accumulating strain to be released in next large earthquake Something is weakening the plate boundary to allow the transition from locked with no seismicity to unlocked with seismicity at ~250o C
What causes the onset of microseismicity at 15-17 km depth where modeled temperatures on the plate interface are ~200-250oC Stable sliding Fault zone weakening by increased pore-fluid pressure from low grade metamorphic reations in basalt Stick-slip
Fluid flow excursions caused by 3 episodes of slow slip on the plate interface Brown et al. (2005)
Interseismic Strain Accumulation 2003 Geodetically observed slow slip event Slow Earthquake Signal
Episodic Aseismic Slip - Locates at frictional transitions between stable sliding and stick slip behavior 0 20 40 60 80 100 % Locked
Modified from Dragert and Rogers [2004] Modified from Obara and Hirose [2005]
Northeast Japan strain accumulation, asperity and afterslip patterns 2005 Nias Earthquake Afterslip DIFFERENT FRICTIONAL PROPERTIES CONTROL FAST VS. SLOW SLIP Velocity Weakening Velocity Weakening/ Strengthening Transition Strain Accumulation Slip- Abundant Microseismicity Coseismic Slip- Asperity Afterslip Slow Slip Events
Different frictional properties control fast vs. slow slip No observations of slow slip in strongly coupled regions exist
Hot or warm subduc-tion zones have deep slow slip Cascadia SW Japan Mexico Deep slow slip may require frictional transition at shallow depth (low pressure) or fluids generated from dehydration reactions (baslate-eclogite). Cooler subduction zones or with thin overriding crust have shallow slow slip NE Japan (afterslip) Boso Japan Costa Rica
New GPS/Seismic/Tilt Nicoya Network for Detection of Slow Slip Events Collaborators: Tim Dixon, Kim Psencik (UM), Marino Protti, Victor Gonzales (OVSICORI-UNA) Technical Support: Dan Sampson (UCSC), Jacob Sklar & Freddy Blume (UNAVCO) SFB574 Borehole Seismic: Ernst Flueh, Wolfgang Rabbel, Martin Thorwart & Nilay Dinc
CONCLUSIONS: Strain along the northern Costa Rica plate boundary is released in large earthquakes and slow slip. Spatial separation exists between these two modes of strain release with strain presently accumulating just offshore the Nicoya Peninsula and slow slip occurring in regions up and down-dip of this. A dense network of cGPS, seismic and tilt stations has been installed to improve our understanding of slow slip at this plate boundary.