180 likes | 196 Views
Landis Run Intermediate School Lancaster, PA. Matt Stevenson Adviser: Robert Leicht Construction Management. Presentation Overview. Matt Stevenson|Construction Management. Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster , PA. Breadth Topics:
E N D
Landis Run Intermediate School Lancaster, PA Matt Stevenson Adviser: Robert Leicht Construction Management
Presentation Overview Matt Stevenson|Construction Management Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA Breadth Topics: Breadth Topic #1: Mechanical System Reduction (Tied into Analysis #1) Breadth Topic #2: Acoustical Study of Modular Wall (Tied to Analysis #2) • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements Depth Topics: Analysis #1: Feasibility and Impact of Geothermal Heat Pumps Analysis #2: Feasibility and Impact of Modular Classrooms Analysis #3: Analysis of Electrical Underground Rough-In Method Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method Analysis
Project Background Matt Stevenson|Construction Management Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA Building Systems: Facade • Brick and Decorative CMU Veneer • Glazing Structural System • Load Bearing Masonry • Open Web K Joists • CIP Concrete on Composite Deck Mechanical System • VAV System w/ Nine AHUs • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements General Project Information: • 210, 000 SF Middle School (5th & 6th Grades) • Total Building Cost $26.4 Million • One Story in Areas A & B • Three Stories in Areas C & D • Striving for LEED Silver • Building Layout: • Area A: Administrative Suite, Gymnasium, Cafeteria • Area B: Mechanical Room, Music Classrooms • Area C: Classrooms • Area D: Classrooms and Library
Geothermal Heat Pumps Matt Stevenson|Construction Management Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Background Information • Feasibility and Construction Impact • Cost Impact • LEED Impact • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements Potential Problem/Opportunity • LEED Silver Commendable • Possibility of Achieving Higher • Great Deal of Space on Site • Long Life Span Can Sustain Longer Payback Periods for Renewable Energy Goal Is To Determine: • Cost Impacts • Construction Impact • LEED Impact
Geothermal Heat Pumps Matt Stevenson|Construction Management Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Background Information • Feasibility and Construction Impact • Cost Impact • LEED Impact • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements • Quantity & Placement • GLD Software:150 Wells at 343’ • Two Well Fields to East of Building • Minor Construction Traffic Interrupted • Schedule • Assuming 2 Wells Per Day • Drilling Would Start 5/25/11 • Drilling Would End 9/7/11 • Earliest AHU Tie-In 10/7/11
Geothermal Heat Pumps Matt Stevenson|ConstructionManagement Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA • Initial Cost • Deduct $104,438 • Add$1,008,000 For Wells • Mechanical Contract Will • Increase By 18.4% to $5,803,562 • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Background Information • Feasibility and Construction Impact • Cost Impact • LEED Impact • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements • Long Term Cost • Requires System Design, Building Loads, etc. • Less Maintenance Required • Longer Life Expectancy • Efficiency Typically In the 300-450% As Compared With 80-90% of Typical Boilers
Geothermal Heat Pumps Matt Stevenson|Construction Management Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA • Existing LEED Rating • 44 Credits For 52 Points • 2 Regional Priority Credits Missing For 2 Points • Public Transportation Access • Storm Water Design – Quality Control • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Background Information • Feasibility and Construction Impact • Cost Impact • LEED Impact • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements • Probable Additional Credits • Optimize Energy Performance • Unknown Possible Point Value • On-Site Renewable Energy • Probable 7 Points • Revised LEED Rating • Obtain LEED Gold with 61 Points
Modular Classrooms Matt Stevenson|ConstructionManagement Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Background and Benefits • Module Assumptions • Cost and Schedule Impact • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements Potential Opportunity • C & D Are Repetitive Both Horizontally & Vertically • 70% of Building Square Footage • Could Dramatically Impact Project Efficiency Goal Is To Determine • Cost Impact • Schedule Impact
Modular Classrooms Matt Stevenson|ConstructionManagement Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA Module Assumptions • All Systems (MEP),Finishes, & Casework Preinstalled • Each Classroom Comprised of Two Modules • Interior Module Layout Two • Cost Savings of 20% • Four Modules Can Be Set per Day • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Background and Benefits • Module Assumptions • Cost and Schedule Impact • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements
Modular Classrooms Matt Stevenson|ConstructionManagement Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA Schedule Impact • 186 Modules / 4 (mod/day) = 46.5 Working Days • Area C Accelerated 347 • Area D Accelerated 363 Days • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Background and Benefits • Module Assumptions • Cost and Schedule Impact • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements Cost Impact • Overall Project Savings of $3.72 Million • Results in Cost Savings of 14.1%
Noise Reduction of Modular Wall Matt Stevenson|ConstructionManagement Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements Goal • Determine Difference in Noise Reduction of Existing & Modular Wall • Ensure Modules Still Meet Acoustical Prerequisite Results • Significantly Differ At 2k and 4k • Modular Wall Still Performs Adequately • Prerequisite Only Based on Area and NR Rating of Ceiling Materials • Classrooms Still Meet Acoustical Prerequisite
Electrical Rough-In Method Matt Stevenson|ConstructionManagement Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Background • Schedule & Cost Impact • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements Potential Problem • Underground Rough-In Used for All Ground Floors • Activity Part of Critical Path, & Delays Dry-In • Possibly More Expensive, Longer Goal Is To Determine • Cost Impact • Schedule Impact
Electrical Rough-In Method Matt Stevenson|ConstructionManagement Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Background • Schedule & Cost Impact • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements Schedule Impact • Overhead Performed After Dry-In • Underground Performed Prior To Slab Pouring • OH Finishes on Average 23 Days Sooner Duration Impact • Electricians: 2.6 Hours Less per Classroom with OH • Equals Saving 34.5 Working Days By Using Overhead RI
Electrical Rough-In Method Matt Stevenson|ConstructionManagement Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA Cost Impact • Estimate Yields OH is $.49 Cheaper • Differing Items Include Conduit, Wire, Hangers, & Trench Digging • Results In A Savings of $50,086.71 • 1.7% of Electrical Contract • 0.18% of Overall Building Cost • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Background • Schedule & Cost Impact • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements
Project Delivery Method Matt Stevenson|ConstructionManagement Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA The Pennsylvania Separations Act of 1913 • Requires Government Entities To Seek & Hold Separate Contracts For Electrical, Heating, Ventilation, and Plumbing In Excess of $4,000 • Only Three Other States Have Similar Laws (ND, IL, NY) • Present In Both State Law & School Code • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Background and Separations Act of 1913 • Results For Variety of Government Owners • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements Potential Problem • Using Multiple Prime; • Increases Coordination & Communication • Increases Owner Paperwork & Organization Load • Multiples Costs • Increases the Litigation Potential Against Owner • Increases Chances of Miscommunication & Mistakes Goal • Determine How Government Projects Can Gain Exemption To The Pennsylvania Separations Act of 1913
Project Delivery Method Matt Stevenson|ConstructionManagement Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA Exemptions • The Act Has Long Since Been Repealed For: • Boroughs • Townships • Second-Class Townships • Third Class Cities • Counties • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Background and Separations Act of 1913 • Results For Variety of Government Owners • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements Department of General Services • Places Requirements on DB Contractor • Contractor Must Identify Major Subs Before Hand • At Discretion of DGS Department of Education • Waiver Program As Part of EEA • Could Apply To Be Waived From Separations Act • Challenged In Court But Ultimately Upheld • Expired in 2010, No Similar Programs or Plans To Renew
Summary & Conclusion Matt Stevenson|ConstructionManagement Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA Electrical Rough-In Method - Implement • OH RI Saves $50,000 • Dry-In Dates Accelerated 23 Days on Average • Activity Duration Reduced By 35 Working Days Geothermal Heat Pumps - Implement • Initial Cost Increased By 18.4% • Lower Utility & Maintenance Cost • Reduces Emissions • No Significant Construction Impact • Pushes Project To LEED Gold • Presentation Overview • Project Background • Analysis #1: Geothermal Heat Pumps • Analysis #2: Modular Classroom Wings • Breadth #1: Noise Reduction of Modular Walls • Analysis #3: Electrical Rough-In Method • Analysis #4: Project Delivery Method • Summary and Conclusion • Acknowledgements Modular Classrooms - Implement • Substantial Completion Date of Areas C & D Accelerated • Savings of $3.72 Million or 14.1% of Project Cost Alternative Project Delivery Method – Not Possible • Design Build May Be Used For DGS Projects At Their Discretion • Previously Used To Be Able To Use Single Prime For DOE But No Longer Can • Multiple Prime Not Required For Boroughs, Townships, Second-Class Townships, Third-Class Cities, and Counties
Acknowledgements Matt Stevenson|ConstructionManagement Landis Run Intermediate Lancaster, PA Academic Acknowledgements Dr. Robert Leicht Dr. Moses Ling Dr. Linda Hanagan All Penn State AE Faculty Industry Acknowledgements Warfel Construction Crabtree, Rohrbaugh & Associates MBR Construction Services Special Thanks To: Brett Calabretta Kyle Goodyear John Hess Jim Spence Joshua bower Manheim Township School District Family & Friends Questions/Comments?