1 / 21

Astroparticle yield in radio galaxies jets and hot spots

Astroparticle yield in radio galaxies jets and hot spots. A.Marcowith (C.E.S.R. Toulouse France) F.Casse (F.O.M. Rijnhuizen, the Netherlands & A.P.C. Paris, France). Outline. Multi-  & high spatial resolution observations . Methodology : MHD-SDE code. Jets & hot spots :

kordell
Download Presentation

Astroparticle yield in radio galaxies jets and hot spots

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Astroparticle yield in radio galaxies jets and hot spots A.Marcowith (C.E.S.R. Toulouse France) F.Casse (F.O.M. Rijnhuizen, the Netherlands & A.P.C. Paris, France)

  2. Outline • Multi- & high spatial resolution observations. • Methodology: MHD-SDE code. • Jets & hot spots: - Particle transport in complex flows - Microscopic turbulence - Astroparticle yield • Future works.

  3. Multi- observations • Multi-wavelength spectra • High resolution maps (VLBI, HST, Chandra & XMM-Newton).  Spectral and spatial analysis • Supernova remnants (van der Swaluw & Achterberg 2004) • Massive star formation sites (poster on Super-bubbles) • Active Galactic Nuclei jets and hot spots (this talk)

  4. Radio-X-ray jets IC/CMB ? synchrotron Sambruna et al. 2002 1’’ = 5.4 kpc

  5. FRII hot spots Hot spot A Wilson et al. 2000 core jets Chandra Cygnus A (VLA 5 GHz ) SSC FR = Fanaroff Riley radio-galaxies FRII are the most powerful RG.

  6. Astrophysical interests • Radiative processes in high energy sources: - Origin of the X-ray radiation in jets and hot spots • Relativistic particle production, acceleration and propagation: - Cosmic-ray physics. • Constraints on transport processes: - Turbulence (fluid & microscopic), magnetic field configuration, link to macroscopic structures. Need for multi-scale computational methods linking large MHD scale to kinetic transport ...

  7. Multi-scale simulation • (3D+time) MHD + kinetic Eq. + radiative processes. • MHD:Versatile Advection Code(www.physics.uu.nl/~toth) - 3D conservative schemes & non-relativistic flows • Kinetic equations: Diffusive approximation - Stochastic differential equations Diffusion-convection equation • Radiative processes:synchrotron/IC losses (e-), hadronic interaction (p-p, p- gamma-ray & neutrino)

  8. Diffusive shock acceleration • Constraints on tsde and  Xadv downstream upstream Xdiff Xshock « ideal » sharp discontinuity Numerical smoothing over few grid cells Necessary condition to compute the shock process correctly: Xadv (= Vflow tsde)< Xshock < Xdiff (= √2  tsde) (Kruells & Achterberg 1994 + N Dim. extension Casse & Marcowith 2003)  tsde and min

  9. SDEs • 3D axisymetric MHD  Vflow, B, tMHD. • Microscopic turbulence model  diffusion coefficients . • Sum number of particles N(p,t) in a given (r,z)  distribution function at tMHD.

  10. Extragalactic jets & hot spots FRI jets: (Casse & Marcowith A&A 2003) • Complex shock structures. • Multiple-shock acceleration. Hot spots:(Casse & Marcowith PRD 2004 sub.) • Constraints on turbulence regime. • Magnetic field configuration. • Astroparticle yield (gamma-rays, high energy neutrinos, cosmic-rays).

  11. Complex shock structure Kelvin-Helmoltz instability  internal shocks in jet T1 (weak curved shock: < r > = 2.76) < T2 (strong planar shock: < r > = 4) Stationary sol. F(p)  p-3r/(r-1)

  12. Hot spot simulation Poloidal MF AMR-VAC (Keppens 2004)

  13. Astroparticle yield in HS Cygnus A: Electrons Cygnus A: protons At the terminal shock Over the HS synchrotron zoom Proton Escaping the HS At the terminal shock Kolmogorov turbulence + poloidal MF Ecr max fixed by escape losses  transport Ecrmax ~ 5 x 1016 eV

  14. 3C273A: electrons 3C273A: protons At the terminal shock Over the whole HS At the terminal shock synchrotron zoom Escaping protons Kolmogorov turbulence + toroidal MF Ecrmax ~ 7 x 1019 eV

  15. E-2 spectrum Secondaries from 3C273A • Neutrinos flux on Earth: 2.3 x 10-14 GeV / cm2 s sr (~ 5 orders of magnitude under ANTARES sensitivity) • p-p gamma-ray flux on Earth: 4.7 x 10-14 GeV / cm2 s sr (~ 3 orders of magnitude under GLAST sensitivity)

  16. Conclusions • Methodology: • Multi- high resolution observations  multi-scale simulations to handle > Macroscopic structures. > Microscopic physics. • Mesoscopic simulation schemes MHD-EDS + Easy to implement, able to handle complex flows configurations with shocks. - Statistics, test-particle approximation. Other methods do exist (T. Downes et al. 2002, T. Jones et al. 1999, A. Micono et al. 1999)

  17. Astrophysics: Jets & Hot spots • Investigate complex shock structure in jets and hot spots • Constraints on acceleration mechanisms or turbulence • Multi- spectra + astroparticle • 3C273A (transverse shock acceleration + high synchrotron cut-off ~ 1014 Hz)

  18. Future works • Full time-dependent simulation for FRI jets • X-ray dominated synchrotron: astroparticle production (FRI & some hot spots) • Multi-wavelength maps • Other objects (SNr,SNr-cloud interaction, colliding stellar winds...) • Extension to relativistic flows (FRII radio-galaxies) • Make time dependent SDEs available for the community and insert an SDE routine in VAC and AMR-VAC.

  19. Multiple shock effects Test particle approximation theory: p F(p)  p-(tacc/tesc) Multiple shock with no escape  flat p F(p) distribution + Synchrotron losses • Spectral energy distribution without synchrotron losses for • Const. Diff. Coeff. • Kolmogorov with ≠ turbulence level

  20. MHD turbulence in HS • Test // and  shocks (poloidal or toroidal MF dominated HS) • Test different transport theory • Isotropic: Kolmogorov, Kraichnan, Bohm. • Anisotropic: Goldreich-Sridhar • Main conclusions • Highest CR energies for Kolmogorov with toroidal MF. • HS with high synchrotron cut-off (optical ~1014 Hz) are prone to be efficient astroparticle (secondaries from p-p and p- interaction: Ep (E/1eV)> 6.6 1016 eV) sources. • Best candidate in Meisenheimer et al. 1989 & 1997 list: • 3C273A(low radio power, high synchrotron cut-off, CR accelerator Ecrmax ~ 7 x 1019 eV). • Cygnus A (powerful radio source, low synchrotron cut-off ~1012 Hz, not expected to be a strong astroparticle source.

  21. Astrophysics: Jets & Hot spots • Hard spectra produced by multiple shocks acceleration (alternative radiative model) • Oblique-perpendicular shocks with Kolmogorov type turbulence favored to produce high energy CRs • Weaker radio but optical Hot spots are expected to be astroparticle sources • - Good candidate 3C273A (transverse shock acceleration + high synchrotron cut-off ~ 1014 Hz)

More Related