MSBO 2009 CONFERENCESEPTEMBER SECRETARY OF EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY FUNDS

1. MSBO 2009 CONFERENCESEPTEMBER SECRETARY OF EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY FUNDS Sally Vaughn Deputy Superintendent, Ph.D. Michigan Department of Education

2. SECRETARY OF EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY FUNDS • An education “moon shot” • Dramatic change • What works for kids vs. adults • $5B in competitive funds • Unprecedented funding to reform education 2

3. TWO PARTS: 1) Race to the Top—State Incentives ($4B) • Special Set-Aside for Common Standards and Assessments—State Consortium ($350) 2) Investing in Innovation—Districts and Nonprofits ($650M) 3

4. RACE TO THE TOP • Draft guidance out in July; final out in October • Two phases of application • -Phase I - due late 2009; awarded spring 2010 • -Phase II – due spring 2010; awarded fall 2010 • 50% of funds to districts based on Title I formula 4

5. TWO PREREQUISITES: • Approved application for SFSF Phases 1 and 2 • No legal barrier against linking student achievement data and teacher/principal effectiveness for evaluation 5

6. CONSIDERATIONS IN PREPARING APPLICATIONS: • State must advance four reform areas • State must set goals and annual targets for each reform area • RTTT will reward states for having created conditions for reform • RTTT will provide incentives to implement reform that integrates across four reform areas 6

7. FIVE PRIORITIES IN EVALUATION OF RTTT APPLICATIONS #1 Comprehensive Approach to Four Reform Areas #2 Emphasis on STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Math) #3 Expansion and Adaptation of Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems #4 P-20 Coordination and Vertical Alignment #5 School-Level Conditions for Reform and Innovation 7

8. #1 COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO FOUR REFORM AREAS • Absolute Priority (States MUST) • State plan for each reform area and demonstrate systemic approach to education reform • State plan to: • Increase student achievement • Reduce achievement gap across subgroups • Increase rates at which students graduate prepared for college and careers 8

9. #1 FOUR REFORM AREAS (cont) • Four reform areas: A) Standards and Assessments • Data systems to support instruction • Great teachers and leaders • Turning around struggling schools 9

10. FOUR REFORM AREAS (cont) A. Standards and Assessments ($350M set-aside) • Develop and adopt common standards—join state consortium • Develop and implement common assessments (phase 2) • Support transition to enhanced standards and assessments 10

11. FOUR REFORM AREAS (cont) B. Data Systems • Fully implement SLDS, including 12 America COMPETES Act components • State plan to ensure data accessible to key stakeholders and used to improve instruction 11

12. FOUR REFORM AREAS (cont) C. Great Teachers and Leaders • Alternative pathways for aspiring teachers/principals • Differentiating teacher and principal effectiveness based on performance, using data for decisions for evaluation, professional development, tenure, and dismissal • Equitable distribution of effective teachers and principals in high poverty schools and hard to staff subjects • Reporting effectiveness of teacher and principal preparation programs • Effective support to teachers and principals, including rapid time student data to inform instruction 12

13. FOUR REFORM AREAS (cont) D. Turning Around Struggling Schools • Intervening in lowest performing schools and districts, including state authority to intervene • Increasing supply of high-quality charter schools, including state restrictions on increasing number, state accountability, and funding for facilities • State plan for lowest-performing 5% of schools, including closing or converting to charter, new leadership/staff, new governance, school flexibility, transformation model 13

14. FIVE PRIORITIES IN EVALUATION OF RTTT APPLICATIONS #1 Comprehensive Approach to Four Reform Areas #2 Emphasis on STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Math) #3 Expansion and Adaptation of Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems #4 P-20 Coordination and Vertical Alignment #5 School-Level Conditions for Reform and Innovation 14

15. #2 EMPHASIS ON STEM • Competitive Priority (States will receive credit for) • State plan to: • Offer rigorous course of study in STEM • Cooperate with industry experts, museums, universities to prepare and assist teachers in integrating STEM across grades and disciplines • Prepare more students for advanced study and careers in STEM, including underrepresented groups 15

16. #3 EXPANSION AND ADAPTATION OF STATEWIDE LONGITUDINAL DATA SYSTEMS • Invitational Priority (States are invited to) • State plan to expand SLDS to integrate data from special ed, ELL, early childhood, HR, finance, health, postsecondary • Collaboration among states to adapt their systems vs building independently 16

17. #4 P-20 COORDINATION AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT • Invitational Priority (States are invited to) • State plan to address how early childhood programs, K-12, post-secondary, and workforce organizations will improve education system and create seamless P-20 route 17

18. #5 SCHOOL-LEVEL CONDITIONS FOR REFORM AND INNOVATION • Invitational Priority (States are invited to) • Participating districts provide schools with flexibilities and autonomies conducive to reform and innovation, such as: selecting staff, expanding learning time, budgets under school’s control, credit based on performance vs. instructional time, services to high-needs students 18

19. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS (8 total) • Signed by Governor, State Superintendent, State Board President • Description of progress made in four reform areas, including through use of ARRA and other federal funding • Financial data showing percentage of total state revenues used education in FY08 and 09 • Description of support from stakeholders and LEAs/PSAs 19

20. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS (cont) • Description participating districts use of funds to address reform areas. • Description of use of funds to improve achievement and graduation rates; close achievement gap; help to high need districts, and overall state plan. • Evidence for each state reform conditions criterion. • Detailed plans for each reform plan criterion, including activities and rationale, timeline, resources, annual targets for performance measures for four school years. 20

21. PART TWO OF RACE TO THE TOP: Investing in Innovation—Districts and Nonprofits ($650M) • Referred to as the “i3 Fund” • Guidance published in Federal Register in fall • Expect awards in early 2010 • Designed for Districts and Nonprofits (charters, IHEs, turn around companies, subsets/consortia of schools within district) • Corporations cannot apply 21

22. Applications evaluated on three major aspects: • Outcome driven, specifically around 4 assurances • Taken to scale, easy to use and cost effective • Sustainable (expecting additional funds from private/public sources; show financial model and political or support model) 22

23. Three categories: • Pure Innovation Grants (up to $5M) to try interesting ideas • Strategic Innovation Grants (up to $30M) for innovative solutions that need additional research base • What Works Innovation Grants (up to $50M) for proven solutions that can be taken to scale 23

24. Key concepts for applications to consider: • Boost student achievement, graduation, matriculation • Early learning • At risk • Creative approach to school day/year • College readiness • Rural as well as urban 24