1 / 26

Public Hearing January 8, 2013

Board of County Commissioners. Public Hearing January 8, 2013. Waterford Commons PD/LUP. Case: CDR-12-10-209 Project: Waterford Commons Planned Development/Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) - Substantial Change Applicant: Bob Ziegenfuss District: 1. Waterford Commons PD/LUP.

kosey
Download Presentation

Public Hearing January 8, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing January 8, 2013

  2. Waterford Commons PD/LUP Case:CDR-12-10-209 Project:Waterford Commons Planned Development/Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) - Substantial Change Applicant:Bob Ziegenfuss District:1

  3. Waterford Commons PD/LUP • Request:To consider a substantial change to the approved Waterford Commons Planned Development/Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) to grant the following three (3) waivers from Orange County Code Section 38-1287, which are necessary to address property line setbacks from existing structures and paving: • 1) A waiver from Section 38-1287(2) to reduce the minimum side building setback from the east property line (for the existing convenience store only) to five (5) feet, in lieu of a minimum side building setback of thirty (30) feet; • 2) A waiver from Section 38-1287(2) to reduce the minimum side building setback from the west property line (for the existing temporary Helipad sales office only) to five (5) feet, in lieu of a minimum side building setback of thirty (30) feet; and

  4. Waterford Commons PD/LUP • Request Cont’d: • 3) A waiver from Section 38-1287(4) to reduce the minimum paving setback from the east property line (for the existing convenience store parking area only) to zero (0) feet, in lieu of a minimum paving setback of seven and one-half (7.5) feet.

  5. Waterford Commons PD/LUP Zoning

  6. Waterford Commons PD/LUP Future Land Use

  7. Waterford Commons PD/LUP PD Land Use Plan (1)

  8. Waterford Commons PD/LUP PD Land Use Plan (2)

  9. Waterford Commons PD/LUP Action Requested • Find the request consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and approve the Substantial Change to the approved Waterford Commons PD/LUP dated “Received October 4, 2012” subject to the seven (7) conditions in the staff report.

  10. Eagle Creek PD/LUP Case: CDR-12-07-144 Project: Eagle Creek Planned Development/ Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) - Substantial Change Applicant:Joe Kolb District: 4

  11. Eagle Creek PD/LUP • Request:To consider a substantial change to the approved Eagle Creek Planned Development/Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) to incorporate the following modifications and updates: • 1) To internally transfer nine (9) residential units from PD Parcel “K” to PD Parcel “L”; • 2) To convert 27,500 sq. ft. of retail land use within PD Parcel “N” to office land use; • 3) To allow for a mix of front-loaded and rear-loaded townhomes within PD Parcel “L”; • 4) To allow one (1) additional Narcoossee Road access point; and • 5) To refine PD parcel acreages, residential densities and park, golf course and open space allocations.

  12. Eagle Creek PD/LUP • Request Cont’d: The following waivers from Orange County Code are also requested: • 1) A waiver from Section 38-1254(1) to allow a minimum twenty (20) foot setback from all boundaries of the PD for one-story and two-story residential units within PD Parcel “M” only, in lieu of a minimum twenty-five (25) foot setback; • 2) A waiver from Section 38-1254(2) to allow a minimum twenty (20) foot setback from an arterial street (Narcoossee Road) within PD Parcel “M” only, in lieu of a minimum fifty (50) foot setback; • 3) A waiver from Section 38-1258(b) to allow a maximum building height, including all architectural features, of three (3) stories and fifty (50) feet for buildings located between one-hundred (100) feet and one-hundred fifty (150) feet from single family zoned property within PD Parcel “M” only, in lieu of requiring that the buildings vary

  13. Eagle Creek PD/LUP • Request Cont’d: The following waivers from Orange County Code are also requested: • height with a maximum of fifty percent (50%) of the buildings being three (3) stories, not exceeding forty (40) feet in height and the remaining buildings being one (1) story and two (2) stories in height; • 4) A waiver from Section 38-1258(c) to allow a maximum building height, including architectural features, of three (3) stories and fifty (50) feet for buildings located one-hundred (100) feet or greater from single-family zoned property within PD Parcel “M” only, in lieu of three (3) stories or forty (40) feet in height for buildings located within one-hundred and fifty (150) feet of single family zoned property;

  14. Eagle Creek PD/LUP • Request Cont’d: The following waivers from Orange County Code are also requested: • 5) A waiver from Section 38-1258(d) to allow a maximum building height, including architectural features, of three (3) stories and fifty (50) feet within PD Parcel “M” only, in lieu of three (3) stories and thirty-five feet; • 6) A waiver from Section 38-1272(3) to allow a twenty (20) foot setback along the perimeter of a PD that is adjacent to an arterial road for office buildings within PD Parcel “M” only, in lieu of a minimum setback for general commercial development of forty (40) feet along the perimeter of a PD that is adjacent to an arterial road; • 7) A waiver from Section 38-79(5)(b)(2) to extend the permit for the temporary sales trailer located within PD Parcel “E” an additional three (3) years from the date of the BCC waiver approval or when

  15. Eagle Creek PD/LUP • Request Cont’d: The following waivers from Orange County Code are also requested: • ninety (90) percent of the subdivision is complete (whichever comes first), in lieu of only the two (2) year period allowed by Section 38-79(5)(b)(2); and • 8) A waiver from Section 38-79(20)(j) to allow a minimum distance between buildings (rear-to-rear) of forty (40) feet with PD Parcel “L” only, in lieu of sixty (60) feet.

  16. Eagle Creek PD/LUP Zoning

  17. Eagle Creek PD/LUP Future Land Use

  18. Eagle Creek PD/LUP PD Land Use Plan

  19. Eagle Creek PD/LUP Action Requested • Find the request consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and approve the Substantial Change to the Eagle Creek PD/LUP dated “Received October 22, 2012,” subject to the seventeen (17) conditions in the staff report.

  20. Windermere Estates PD/LUP Case: CDR-12-12-253 Project: Windermere Estates Planned Development/ Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) Substantial Change Applicant:Trevor Bartley District: 1 Request: To consider a substantial change to the approved Windermere Estates PD/LUP to amend the PD/LUP by reducing the rear yard building setback “for PD Lot 43 only” from fifty (50) feet to twenty (20) feet, and to grant a waiver from Orange County Code Section 38-1254(1) to allow for a minimum twenty (20) foot setback from the PD perimeter ‘for PD Lot 43 only”, in lieu of twenty-five (25) feet.

  21. Windermere Estates PD/LUP Zoning

  22. Windermere Estates PD/LUP Future Land Use

  23. Windermere Estates PD/LUP Setbacks

  24. Windermere Estates PD/LUP PD Land Use Plan

  25. Windermere Estates PD/LUP Action Requested • Find the request consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and approve the Substantial Change to the Windermere Estates PD/LUP dated “Received December 3, 2012,” subject to the three (3) conditions in the staff report.

  26. Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing January 8, 2013

More Related