170 likes | 357 Views
Darkening the Dotted Lines. Rebecca Rocho Assistant Superintendent, General Services and Legislation Calhoun Intermediate School District Co-Chair; DDL Monitoring & Compliance Committee rochob@calhounisd.org www.calhounisd.org 269.789.2475. Darkening the Dotted Lines. What is this?
E N D
Darkening the Dotted Lines Rebecca Rocho Assistant Superintendent, General Services and Legislation Calhoun Intermediate School District Co-Chair; DDL Monitoring & Compliance Committee rochob@calhounisd.org www.calhounisd.org 269.789.2475
Darkening the Dotted Lines • What is this? • This is a partnership between ISDs and the Michigan Department of Education • ISDs are working on 4 Central Issues: • High Priority Schools • Monitoring and Compliance • Administrative Services • Delivery of Services • How will this impact LEAs? Hopefully this partnership will bring resources and support closer to local district staff.
Timeline • September 2006 • February 21, 2007 • April 17, 2007 • 2007-08 • 2007-08 • 2008-09 • Drive-in Conference • MAISA Action Plan • Co-Chair Kickoff • Planning and Implementation • Implementation of High Priority Schools Support • Implementation of other work
Timeline – Mon. & Compliance • In Fall 2008, the Committee hopes to work with MSBO on a self-assessment document that can completed on-line and the data will be used to inform the PD development • Beginning in 2009, training modules will be developed and provided to school personnel • Much of the training will be provided in a “train the trainer” model
Monitoring and Compliance • School Business Officials will be most impacted by this sub-committee • Purpose: “to improve the quality of grant management in accordance with law/regulations relative to federal and state grants and funding thus assuring continued funding and mitigating disallowed costs”
Monitoring and Compliance Scope of Work • ISDs will provide professional development in a variety of mediums relative to: • Cash Management • Allowable Costs • Procurement • Time Keeping (time allocation across grant programs)
Determination of Scope of Work • A joint sub-committee of MDE and MAISA representatives reviewed MDE audit findings to determine those areas that were most cited • From those areas most cited, the committee deliberated about those issues that put districts most at risk of disallowed costs or penalties for grant or fiscal management
Who is involved? • Each of the 4 sub-committees of the Monitoring and Compliance Committee is staffed with MDE and MAISA staff • Individuals serve on the committees that most align to their area of expertise
What is Involved? • The central purpose of the Committee is to review the audit findings and determine the most common practices or procedures that are problematic for school personnel • Conduct a self-assessment of LEA staff to determine their confidence level on such areas • Development professional development to meet these training needs in a variety of formats
How will training be provided? • The Committee wants to provide training that meets school personnel needs, but includes at least: • Face to face training (ISD or regional) • On-line Tutorials • On-line Support • Professional Development tools available at MDE website and ISD websites • Opportunity (via Blackboard or other products) to provide Chat opportunities
PD Content – Cash Management • Funds Requests – internal and drawing down funding from MDE • Budget Process • Final Expenditure Reports • Supplanting limitations
PD Content – Allowable Costs • Federal cost principles – “reasonable and necessary” to project • Relevant federal program rules • Approved program design and budgets • Program specific fiscal rules • Consistency with EDGAR (Ed Department General Administrative Regulations)
PD Content - Procurement • Procurement procedures • Contract administration and awards • Internal controls and documentation • Link to appropriate State and Federal policy, statutes and guidelines (e.g.: competitive vs. non-competitive, conflict of interest, contract awards) • Inventory & tracking equipment / supplies (retention and disposal)
PD Content - Timekeeping • Written procedures for Personnel Activity Reports (PAR) – how staff are split among grants • PAR schedule and oversight • Certifications – schedule and oversight • Cost adjustments – when, how, why, etc.
Goals • Develop training curriculum in 4 major areas of Monitoring and Compliance re: grants / projects • Aggregate applicable, indexed resources in single place for access • Provide LEA self-assessment – PD • Develop resources (Definitions, FAQs, Index of policy “circulars”) • Develop LEA process documentation and checklists
Outcomes • Leverage partnerships to leverage the use of current PD that helps to further these goals • Work with MSBO to jointly development professional development that can be delivered in a face-to-face setting • Work with MSBO ISD SBO Committee to build capacity in ISDs to provide face-to-face training
Questions • What questions do you have of the DDL Committee? • What resources do ISDs need/have? • Should we check quarterly re: support and implementation?