410 likes | 437 Views
Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Longitudinal Frequency Data. Joseph Jordan Advisor: John C. Kern II Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Duquesne University May 6, 2005. Outline. Motivation The Model Model Simulation Model Implementation
E N D
Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Longitudinal Frequency Data Joseph Jordan Advisor: John C. Kern II Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Duquesne University May 6, 2005
Outline • Motivation • The Model • Model Simulation • Model Implementation • Metropolis-Hastings Sampling Algorithm • Results • Conclusion • References
Motivation • Yale University Study: The Patrick & Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Foundation • Menopausal women in breast cancer remission • Acupuncture relief of menopausal symptoms • Unlike previous models, this model explicitly recognizes time dependence through prior distributions
Model Simulations:Study Information • Individuals randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups • Length of Study: 13 weeks (1 week baseline followed by 12 weeks of “treatment” • Measurement: Hot flush frequency (91 observations)
Motivation:Study Samples • Education Group: 6 individuals given weekly educational sessions • Treatment Group: 16 individuals given weekly acupuncture on effective bodily areas • Placebo Group: 17 individuals given weekly acupuncture on non-effective bodily areas
Model Implementation:Markov Chain Monte Carlo • Metropolis-Hastings Sampling: • Gibbs Sampling:
Metropolis-Hastings Sampling:Requirements • MUST know posterior distribution for parameter (product of likelihood and prior distributions) • Computational precision issues – utilize natural logs • For example:
Gibbs Sampling:Requirements • Requirement: MUST know full conditional distribution for parameter • Sample from full conditional distribution; ALWAYS accept *I • For Example:
Metropolis-HastingsLikelihood for ij • ij: mean hot flush freq on days i and 2i-1 for i=1,…,44, with 45j representing the mean hot flush freq for days 89, 90, 91
Metropolis-HastingsDifference in log posterior densities evaluated at *ij and cij
Metropolis-HastingsDifference in log posterior densities evaluated at *j and cj
Metropolis-HastingsUpdating j • Same likelihood as j
Metropolis-HastingsUpdating 2j • Same likelihood as j
Metropolis-HastingsUpdating 0j • Same posterior as ij’s
Metropolis-HastingsUpdating • Same likelihood as • Uniform prior
Metropolis-HastingsUpdating a and b • Uniform Prior • Same likelihood and prior for b
References • Borgesi, J. 2004. A Piecewise Linear Generalized Poisson Regression Approach to Modeling Longitudinal Frequency Data. Unpublished masters thesis, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. • Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., and Rubin, D.B. 1995. Bayesian Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall. • Gilks, W.R., Richardson, S., and Spiegelhalter, D.J. 1996. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. London: Chapman and Hall. • Kern, J. and S.M. Cohen. 2005. Menopausal symptom relief with acupuncture: modeling longitudinal frequency data. Vol 34, 3: Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation.