100 likes | 194 Views
Agenda Thursday July 7. Discussion: Ekechi , Stilwell, and ‘Mr. Johnson ’. Brief: Background to Maji Maji . Debate; “Be it resolved, that the history of European colonial rule in Africa is only a history of oppression”. Character list, Mister Johnson. Maynard Eziashi as Mister Johnson
E N D
AgendaThursday July 7 • Discussion: Ekechi, Stilwell, and ‘Mr. Johnson’. • Brief: Background to MajiMaji. • Debate; • “Be it resolved, that the history of European colonial rule in Africa is only a history of oppression”.
Character list, Mister Johnson • Maynard Eziashi as Mister Johnson • Pierce Brosnan as Harry Rudbeck • Edward Woodward as SargyGollup • BeatieEdney as Celia Rudbeck • Denis Quilley as Bulteen • Nick Reding as Tring • Bella Enahoro as Bamu • Femi Fatoba as Waziri • KwabenaManso as Benjamin • Hubert Ogunde as Brimah (as Chief Hubert Ogunde) • Sola Adeyemi as Ajali • Jerry Linus as Saleh • George Menta as Emil
Tanganyika, cont’d • Ethnically diverse; more than 120 distinct groups • Languages: Khoisan, Cushitic, Nilotic, and Bantu. • Cultural and technical interaction, eg. Sandawe • Flexible identity; eg. Shambaa
Prone to diseases, eg. smallpox, malaria and tsetse. • Constant threat of drought. • Both stateless and chiefly societies.
Contained valuable trade networks. • Ivory, slaves. • Omani authority (1698); Zanzibar, Pemba, and coastal towns.
German East Africa, 1885. • 1898 ‘head tax’ • 1902; coerced cotton cultivation.
“Be it resolved, that the history of European colonial rule in Africa is only a history of oppression”. • When presenting your argument; • Each side must make reference to ideas, paradigms, or examples from readings (2), lectures (2), and Mr. Johnson (1). • Each side must situate their argument within the historiography of Africa, or explain how the historiography influences their argument. • When presenting your rebuttal; • Each counter-argument must be supported by ideas and examples from readings and lectures. • Judges, brainstorm a list of ideas and arguments for each side. • Assess the arguments presented by each side, and how well their ideas were supported. • Summarize what you see as being the most significant aspects of their arguments, declare a winner, and explain why you choose them
Structure of debate • Beginning with the affirmative, each group will present an overview of their argument (no more than 3 minutes) • Alternating between affirmative and negative, each group will present their supporting ideas, one at a time. • In a debate, typical strategy suggests that you start with your strongest points, and end with your weaker ones. • Break for 5 minutes, and develop a critique of your opponents argument. Refer to specific points, and use evidence to support your counter-arguments. • Judges should begin deliberating at this point. • Both groups will have a chance to respond to their opponents critique, and summarize their argument. • Judges will finish deliberating, declare a winner, and offer an assessment of both arguments, justifying their selection.