250 likes | 375 Views
Earth History GEOL 2110. The Paleozoic Era Part 3: Cambrian and Ordovician History of Minnesota and Wisconsin. Major Concepts.
E N D
Earth History GEOL 2110 The Paleozoic Era Part 3: Cambrian and Ordovician History of Minnesota and Wisconsin
Major Concepts • When sea-level rose in the Cambrian and Ordovician (Sauk and Tippecanoe Trangressions), the mid-continent of Laurentia was low lying, but with some broad topographic highs (Wisc. Dome, Transcontinental Arch, Sioux Highland, Taylors Falls Volcanic Islands) and lows (Hollandale Embayment). • Four major transgressive cycles are represented by stratigraphic sequences of sandstoneshalelimestone in Minnesota and Wisconsin. Regressions are marked by regressive sands capped by unconformities. • The purity and coarseness of the Cambrian and Ordovian quartz sandstone formations have made them important sources for glass –making and other industrial uses over the decades. However, they are currently highly sought after as sources of natural proppants for use in hydrofracing extraction of oil and gas.
Geologic Timescale in Minnesota Today’s Lecture
Evolution of the Penokean Mountains JAY COOKE St. CLOUD HIBBING
1,000,000,000 Years Ago Minnesota becomes the stable interior of the North American Continent 500,000,000 Years Ago Shallow seas begin to periodically flood Minnesota
Distribution of Cambrian Sediments over Laurentia • Warping of the Craton • Broad horizontal tectonic stresses related to plate motion • Sediment loading • Isostatic adjustments due to different densities within the crust MCR
Depositional Environments in Cambrian Epiric Seas From A. Runkel (MGS)
Regression No Deposition/Erosion The Jordan Unconformity
Transgressive - Regressive Cycles of the Hollandale Embayment
The Actual PictureStorms, Trans-Regress Mini-cycles From A. Runkel (MGS)
Ordovician Rocks of the Mississippi River Bluffs P-Platteville Limestone G-Glenwood Shale S-St. Peter Sandstone P G-- S Indian Mounds Park P Minnehaha Falls G-- S P G-- S Ford Dam and Lock
Fossil Hunting in the Twin CitiesLilydale Park (the Brickyards)
Silica Sand Resources in SE Minnesota and SW Wisconsin Mined since the late 1800’s In 2012, 70% of US silica sand goes to 30% to Hydro-fracing for Oil and Gas Currently 36 in WI, 7 in MN, 178 in US silica-rich sandstone current and proposed sand mines
Use Silica Sand in Hydrofracing for Oil and Gas Drilling • Ideal Proppant Characteristics • Strong - crush resistant • Med-crs sand size (16-70 mesh) • Rounded and well sorted • Homogeneous physical properties • Low specific gravity • Low cost and accessible
High Purity Quartz Sandstone Formations >95% Qtz ~5mm
OPPOSITION TO EXPANSION OF SILICA SAND MINING • Concerns: • - Transportation (truck traffic, road degradation, • noise, safety, dust) • high road use taxes, noise and dust abatement • Air quality, silicosis? • wetting, minimal crushing • Water quality and quantity issues • recycling • Landscape alterations • reclamation plans up front • - Opposition to end use-hydrofracdrilling for oil and gas • Most operations are currently regulated to varying degrees by State and County level ordinances. • Key questions • How does SS mining differ from aggregate mining that has been practiced and regulated for decades? • What is the magnitude and duration of the expansion?
Next Lecture • The Paleozoic Era • Part 4: The Silurian and Devonian Periods