100 likes | 177 Views
On how a PhD Student is contributing to research, but not founding it: a parabole with Open Source Software. Alejandro Hernandez Technical University of Denmark PhD Association. About me:. Born in Rosario (Argentina) Computer Scientist (National University of Rosario)
E N D
On how a PhD Student is contributing to research, but not founding it:a parabole with Open Source Software Alejandro Hernandez Technical University of Denmark PhD Association
About me: • Born in Rosario(Argentina) • Computer Scientist (National University of Rosario) • Experience as Software Engineer in the Industry • TA jobs for several years • PhD from The Technical University of Denmark (DTU) • Work for the DTU PhD Association (and PhD-Nettet): • Board member (2010-present) • President (2011) • Delegate towards Eurodoc (2012) • Fields of expertise: • Embedded-software, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Formal Methods (Formal verification, model checking, static analysis), Information Security, Algorithms Design
On software licences: • Propietary: • You can only use the software the way it’s intended by the creator. • Can’t change it, can’t re-distribute it, can’t reverse engineer it, can’t even sell it! • Open source: • GPL, BSD, FreeBSD • Generally, you can take a piece of software and understand/modify/re-distribute it. • There might be some restrictions as well…
Pasteur’s quadrant (1) • Does the research follow a quest for basic/fundamental understanding? • fundamental/basic research • driven by essence of things instead of applications • Does the research consider some uses? • intended useful outcome • driven by everyday needs
Innovation analogy • Does the software licensing follow a quest for free distribution? • software to be improved by others • creator wants to be “famous“ among colleagues • Does the software creator consider some selling goals? • software cannot be adapted by anybody else • creator wants to earn money with creation
Examples of innovators • Bill Gates • created what people needed • didn’t want others to change it • Linus Torvalds • created something with the purpose of learning • shared for getting feedback • Ulf Michael (Monty)Widenius • created a “state of the art”technology for databases, people needed this • open source aiming at getting even better technology • sold creation to Sun
About a PhD student • They are (young) researchers -> must fall in some quadrant (original, not analogy) • Edison’s? • attacking application problems using some already-done fundamental research • Borh’s? • “small” fundamental questions can be attacked • Pasteur’s? • limited time, so difficult to do fundamental research aimed at obtaining applications • aiming at answering fundamental questions that lead to direct applications is not always feasible (analogy: Monty is “one in thousands”)
Conclusion • Research can be analogous to innovation • PhD Students have to carefully choose their topic • Proprietary software might progress faster than open source. Analogously, applied research tends to be more manageable than basic. • Some extra comments: • PhD studies are limited time, but these have several implications for future of PhD student • pursuing PhD studies (analogous to) working in Open community • PhD can be done to improve oneself (then go to industry) • Some others, might pursue further research, perhaps then being able to fall in Pasteur’s quadrant…