350 likes | 363 Views
Explore the challenges and strategies for transitioning data mining into mainstream tech adoption, based on experiences and concepts from Geoffrey Moore's Crossing the Chasm. Learn about the psychographic profiles, behaviors, and market roles of different adopter groups. Discover the journey of Quest/Intelligent Miner, IBM's journey in bringing data mining technology to market, and the crucial aspects of chasm crossing.
E N D
Data Mining: Crossing the Chasm Rakesh Agrawal IBM Almaden Research Center
Thesis • The greatest challenge facing data mining is to make the transition from being an early market technology to mainstream technology • We have the opportunity to make this transition successful
Outline • Chasm in the technology adoption life cycle, à la Geoffrey Moore† • Experience with Quest/Intelligent Miner • Ideas for successful chasm crossing • Geoffrey A Moore. Crossing the Chasm. Harper Business. http://www.chasmgroup.com
Technology Adoption Life Cycle Pragmatists: Stick with the herd! Conservatives: Hold on! Visionaries: Get ahead of the herd! Skeptics: No way! Techies: Try it! Early Adopters Early Majority Late Majority Laggards Innovators Psychographic profile of each group is different
Innovators: Technology Enthusiasts • Intrigued by any fundamental advance in technology • Like to alpha test new products • Can ignore the missing elements • Want access to top technologists • Want no-profit pricing (preferably free) Gatekeepers to early adopters
Early Adopters: Visionaries • Driven by vision of dramatic competitive advantage via revolutionary breakthroughs • Great imagination for strategic applications • Not so price-sensitive • Want rapid time to market • Demand high degree of customization Fund the development of early market
Early Majority: Pragmatists • Want sustainable productivity improvement through evolutionary change • Astute managers of mission-critical apps • Understand real-world issues and tradeoffs • Focus on proven applications; want to see the solution in production Bulwark of the mainstream market
Late Majority: Conservatives • Want to stay even with the competition • Risk averse • Price sensitive • Need completely pre-assembled solutions Extend technology life cycles
Laggards: Skeptics • Driven to maintain status quo • Good at debunking marketing hype • Disbelieve productivity-improvement arguments • Can be formidable opposition to early adoption of a technology Retard the development of high-tech markets
Crack in the curve Chasm Mainstream Market Early Market The greatest peril in the development of a high-tech market lies in making the transition from an early market dominated by a few visionaries to a mainstream market dominated by pragmatists.
Adventurous First strike capability Early buy-in State of the art Think big Spend big Prudent Staying power Wait-and-see Industry standard Manage expectation Spend to budget Visionaries vs. Pragmatists
Is data mining following this curve? • Yes!!! • My personal viewpoint based on Quest/Intelligent Miner experience
Quest • Started as skunk work in early nineties • Inspired by needs articulated by industry visionaries: • Transaction data collected over a long period • Current tools/SQL don’t cut it • About ready to throw data
Approach • Examine “real” applications • Identify operations that cut across applications • Design fast, scalable algorithms for each operation • Develop applications by composing operations
Associations Sequential Patterns Similar time series New Operations Completeness, scalability Classification Clustering Deviations Adopted from Statistics/Learning Scalability Operations http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/quest
Bringing Quest to market • Visionaries who inspired Quest did not become first customers: • Wanted evidence that the technology “worked” • Frustrating attempts to interest major IBM customers: • Integration with existing applications • Too-far-out technology • Resistance from in-house analytic groups
First hits • Small information-based companies who provided data in exchange for free results • CIO who wanted to be seen as the technology pioneer in his industry • CIO who wanted the success story to feature in the company’s annual report Led to the formation of a group offering services using Quest
Characteristics of engagements • Mostly associations and sequential patterns • Completeness a big plus • Unanticipated uses • Feedback for further development
Into the product land • Formation of a small “out-of-plan” product group to productize Quest • Facilitated by a closet mathematician • Successes of the services group used for market validation • Continued development and infusion of technology
Intelligent Miner • Serious product • Integrates technologies from various groups • Fast, scalable, runs on multiple platforms • Several “early market” success stories http://www.software.ibm.com/data/iminer/
Are we in the chasm? • Perceived to be sophisticated technology, usable only by specialists • Long, expensive projects • Stand-alone, loosely-coupled with data infrastructures • Difficult to infuse into existing mission-critical applications
Chasm Crossing • Personal speculations on some technical challenges • Do not imply IBM research/product directions
XML-based Data Mining Standard (1) • Model Building: • A pair of standard DTDs for each operation • Interchangeable library of operator implementations Data Specs Standard DTD Parameters Operator Library Standard DTD Model Ack: Mattos, Pirahesh, Schwenkries
XML-based Data Mining Standard (2) Standard DTDs • Model Deployment: • Mapping XML object provides mapping between names and format in the model object and the data record • Model could have been developed on a different system Data Record Model Mapping Application Library Standard DTD Result
Implications • Standard interfaces for application developers to incorporate data mining • Coupling with relational databases • mappings from DTDs to relational schemas • implementation using existing infrastructure
Data Mining Benchmarks • UC Irvine repository • Generating synthetic benchmarks modeled after real data sets is a hard problem • How to map names into meaningful literals • How to preserve empirical distributions Ack: Srikant, Ullman
Auto-focus data mining • Automatic parameter tuning • Automatic algorithm selection (à la join method selection in database query optimization) Ack: Andreas Arning
Web: Greatest opportunity • Huge collection of data (e.g. Yahoo collecting ~50GB every day) • Universal digital distribution medium makes data mining results actionable in fundamentally new ways • But watch for privacy pitfall
Privacy-preserving data mining • Technical vs. legislated solutions • Implication for data mining algorithms when some fields of a data record have been fudged according to the user’s privacy sensitivity Ack: R. Srikant
Personalization • Internet might provide for the first time tools necessary for users to capture information about themselves and to selectively release this information† • Will we be providing these tools? • † John Hagel, Marc Singer. Net Worth. Harvard Business School Press.
What about Association Rules? • Very long patterns • Separating wheat from chaff • Principled introduction of domain knowledge
What else? • Formal foundations of data mining
Closely couple data mining with database systems Embed data mining into applications Focus on web Standard interfaces Benchmarks Auto focussing Personalization Privacy Summary
Concluding remarks • Data mining, a great technology • Combination of intriguing theoretical questions with large commercial interest in the technology • Poised for transitioning into mainstream technology • Will we rise to the challenge as a community?