1 / 33

Zoning and mapping as agrometeorological services in developing countries: preconditions and requirements in a checklist

Zoning and mapping as agrometeorological services in developing countries: preconditions and requirements in a checklist for action. C.J. Stigter, Agromet Vision, Bruchem, Netherlands Nawal K.N. Al-amin, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan.

kuniko
Download Presentation

Zoning and mapping as agrometeorological services in developing countries: preconditions and requirements in a checklist

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Zoning and mappingas agrometeorological servicesin developing countries:preconditions and requirementsin a checklist for action C.J. Stigter, Agromet Vision, Bruchem, Netherlands Nawal K.N. Al-amin, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan

  2. We consider belonging to agrometeorological services:

  3. All agrometeorological & agro-climatological knowledge and information that can be directly applied to try to improve and/or protect the livelihood of farmers.So yield quantity & quality and income, while safeguarding the agricultural resource base from degradation. 3

  4. From the beginning we considered as good example of such agrometeorological services: the products of agroclimatological characterization, obtained with whatever methodologies. 4

  5. Agroclimatic zoning (characterization)is most simply seen as the division of an area according to the favourablity for agriculture. The separation of taxonomic agroclimatic units (belts, zones, districts, regions) which differ in climatic resources.

  6. Characterization methods(in seven areas, following Bishnoi) • general agricultural suitability • choice of crops, varieties, growing seasons • soil-climatic zones for cropping (systems) • flexible crop planning, covering risks • improvement in crop productivity • assessment of potential productivity • exploitation of agroclimatic resources for specific purposes

  7. GISs successfully focus primarily on capturing, storing, displaying “natural capital”but much more recently also depictsocio-economic indexes and variables Scales and details of the datasets are generally not adequate at farm level. They can support advisory services and contribute to setting the agricultural research agenda

  8. Mapping activities with increasing complexities • Basic research support for mapping • Mapping to support basic policy and design decisions for applied research and development • More complex mapping to support decision preparations of government institutions and/or well to do farmers • More complex mapping to serve poorer farmers and/or related NGOs

  9. Basic research to support mapping <> Map language (Anji Reddy) <> Tree crown projections (TTMI-Project, Tanzania) <> Radiation measurements in all evaporation calculations: instrument comparisons, data quality checking, data consistency investigations (DAP-Project, Tanzania) <> Example of areal cloudiness: Campbell Stokes and satellite data, sample frequency of twice a day Conclusion:it is possible in developing countries to do research that contributes to better mapping

  10. Just the ordinary service of research to research, science to science.It implies for agromet servicesPrecondition: @best level trustable scienceRequirements:@ best operational use of basic data@ appropriate basic quality education(in agrometeorology)

  11. Mapping to support basic policy and design decisions for applied research and development <> Ordinary cases (TTMI, Sudan, Kenya, Nigeria): # soil moisture sampling in cracking clay # wind mapping in a hedged agroforestry system # sand mapping (shelterbelt, around single trees) # root mapping in multiple cropping Conclusion: it is possible in developing countries to use ordinary mapping fruitfully in design research

  12. Just the service of mapping to applied research and design studies.It implies for agromet servicesPrecondition (additional):@knowing regional details of the research questions encounteredRequirements (additional):@ best use of relevant basic operational research results obtained elsewhere@ relevant basic policy decisionsunderlying the research requests

  13. More complex mapping to support decision preparations of government institutions and/or well to do farmers <> general examples but their use as such in the gray literature (example of Baradas in Malaysia) <> China as exception of using disaster mapping in books (CAMS Annual Report); UN <> 20 volumes Agricultural & Forest Meteorology (5 examples, 1.5 %, only 2 from developing countries) <> 6 volumes (24 issues) WMO Bulletin (1999, 2000, 2001: basically nothing; 2002: little increase, 2003: real change in the making; 2004: very much).

  14. Conclusion: supportive mapping is in applications, but generally not supporting decisions<> specific examples (Israel: Lomas et al.; Portugal: Stigter jr.; Sudan: this paper)<> decision makers can conclude from the interpretation of pictures, in the case of Sudan supported by groundtruth, where and how protective measures should be designed.The above means that already earlier derived tough preconditions demand additional prioritization and additional scientific choices for the applied research necessary to develop priority services.

  15. SI Vulnerability map Campina de Faro Campina da Luz

  16. Groundwater quality maps (Based on NO3-, Cl-, SO42-, Ca2+ and indirectly pH, NO2- and PO43-) High qual. Not potabl. Low qual.

  17. It implies for agromet servicesPreconditions (additional):@appropriate problem selection, together with decision makers for whom agrometeorological services have to be developed@ appropriate knowledge selection, to develop the required applied research focused on services

  18. Requirement (additional):@ to determine appropriate policy environments for action on agrometeorological services, what can be done within the present policy environment (preparedness), and what policies may be necessary in the future for the agrometeorological services to be applied

  19. More complex mapping to serve poorer farmers and/or related NGOs <> CGIAR decision on connecting their GISs on agricultural environments in developing countries: agroecological studies excluding socio-economic data; ten years later: “sustainability” concept at UNCED <> no old literature examples <> CAgM report on communication of agromet info (Isabirye, in line with Murthy and Stigter; internet ??) <> Carvajal, private communication to Rossi <> INSAM contest on best examples of agrometeorological services

  20. Highly Humid (Tropical rain forest) Humid (Tropical monsoon) Sub humid (Tropical grassland) Arid Temperate humid Temperate dry Humid high barren plain “Climatic Type” by Thornthwaite 7 2 1 6 3 4 5

  21. It implies for agromet servicesPrecondition (additional):@ knowing poor farmers’ needs the way they see them

  22. Requirement (additional):@ liaisons with farmers, related NGOs and other related decision makers on what they did (traditional preparedness, coping and adaptation strategies), what they can do and what they want to do within the policy environment for agrometeorological services (disaster preparedness and mitigation; land use improvement)

  23. It can be confirmed from these lastly added precondition and requirement that with respect to the livelihood of poorer farmers, bridging the gap between agrometeorological advisory products and such farmers remains the main task of agrometeorologists for the nearest possible future

  24. This confirms conclusions from a CAgM Management Group meeting in Brazil.We felt that applied researchers need helpin bridging the gap.Therefore I also pleaded for training of agrometeorological intermediaries in extension for and training offarmers as decision makers.

  25. The same preconditions and requirements apply to other agrometeorological servicesfor poorer and formally less educated farmers The sequence in each list is now that of a checklist for action

  26. It is these days recognized that sustainable land management is predominantly a conflict resolution issue among the major stakeholders

  27. Summary of preconditions • knowing poor farmers’ needs the way they see them • appropriate problem selection, together with decision makers for whom agrometeorological services have to be developed • knowing regional details of the research questions encountered • appropriate knowledge selection, to develop the required applied research focused on services • best level trustable science

  28. Summary of requirements • liaisons with farmers, related NGOs and other related decision makers on what they did (traditional prepared-ness, coping and adaptation strategies), what they can do and what they want to do within the policy environ-ment for agrometeorological services (disaster preparedness and mitigation; land use improvement) • to determine appropriate policy environments for action on agrometeorological services, what can be done within the present policy environment (preparedness), and what policies may be necessary in the future for the agrometeorological services to be applied

  29. Summary of requirements (cont.) • relevant basic policy decisions underlying the research requests • best use of relevant basic operational research results obtained elsewhere • best operational use of basic data • appropriate basic quality education (in agrometeorology)

More Related