1 / 83

TxACOL Workshop Texas Asphalt Concrete Overlay Design and Analysis System 5-5123-03- P1

TxACOL Workshop Texas Asphalt Concrete Overlay Design and Analysis System 5-5123-03- P1. Project Director: Dr. Dar-Hao Chen TTI Research Team: Sheng Hu, Fujie Zhou, and Tom Scullion. General Information.

kurt
Download Presentation

TxACOL Workshop Texas Asphalt Concrete Overlay Design and Analysis System 5-5123-03- P1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TxACOL WorkshopTexas Asphalt Concrete Overlay Design and Analysis System5-5123-03-P1 Project Director: Dr. Dar-Hao Chen TTI Research Team: Sheng Hu, Fujie Zhou, and Tom Scullion

  2. General Information • Two workshops were held respectively on Aug. 25 at Paris, Tx and on Oct. 6 at Austin, Tx • More than 30 representatives from TxDOT attended • Introduction of TxACOL software, key input parameters, and related lab and field tests were presented • Attendees practiced the software step by step

  3. Presentation Outline • Introduction • Program training and exercises • Key inputs for existing pavement and field testing • Key inputs for asphalt overlay and lab testing

  4. Expected Learning Outcomes • Be able to perform program installation and un-installation • Be familiar with creating, editing, saving, and running a project file • Know how to design an asphalt overlay using the TxACOL program • Understand Key input parameters and the requested lab or field test

  5. Presentation Outline • Introduction • Program training and exercises • Key inputs for existing pavement and field testing • Key inputs for asphalt overlay and lab testing

  6. Crack propagation and reflection cracking analysis • Daily crack propagation: TxACOL Flowchart Input AC Overlay + Existing Pavement Condition Traffic Environment Models Reflection Cracking Model Rutting Model Output Cracking Data and Chart Rutting Data and Chart

  7. TxACOL Features • M-E program • User-friendly interface • Short running time • Default values provided in the software • Traffic input is compatible to the current pavement design software FPS19W

  8. TxACOL Features (Continued) • Pavement temperature is automatically predicted from EICM model • Rutting and cracking are analyzed simultaneously • Output is in Excel format and can be easily incorporated into electronic documents and reports

  9. TxACOL Technical Background

  10. How to Install • Double click “Setup.exe” file • If this is the first installation, the following screens will appear: Choose your favorite installation folder here

  11. How to Uninstall

  12. Launch the Program Double click the icon or

  13. Presentation Outline • Introduction • Program training and exercises • Key inputs for existing pavement and field testing • Key inputs for asphalt overlay and lab testing

  14. Step 1: Create a New Project File Click this button or select the menu “File” -> “New”

  15. Step 2: General Information Input Double Click

  16. Step 3: Project Identification Input Double Click Similar to FPS19W

  17. Step 4: Analysis Parameters & Criteria Input Double Click Defined by crack amount reflected to surface divided by total existing crack amount Only rutting in the new AC overlay is considered

  18. Step 5: Traffic Input Double Click Same as FPS19W

  19. Step 6: Climate Input Double Click

  20. Step 7: Climate Input (Continued) Double Click

  21. Step 8: Structure Input Double Click All commonly used overlay mix types in Texas are included

  22. Step 9: Structure Input (Continued)

  23. Step 10: AC Material Properties Input Level 3 Input Level 1 Input • You can import or export dynamic modulus here

  24. Step 11: Fracture and Rutting Properties Input Fracture Properties Rutting Properties

  25. Step 12: Existing Layer Properties Input Existing AC Existing PCC • The default values are different between JPCP and CRCP

  26. Step 13: Base Layer Properties Input Granular Base Stabilized Base

  27. Step 14: Subgrade Properties Input Level 2 Level 1

  28. Step 15: Save the Project File Click the “save” icon to save all these inputs before running analysis • If it is the first time to save the project, this window will pop up and users can input project name here

  29. Step 16: Run Analysis Click this button

  30. Example 1 (Paris Workshop) • AC over AC • Design life: 10 years • District: Paris, Lamar • Traffic: 5 million ESALs for 20 years • Location: latitude 33°39’, longitude -95°33’, and elevation 600 ft

  31. Example 1 (Paris Workshop) (Continued) • Layer thickness • AC overlay: 2 inches; Existing AC: 3 inches; Base: 6 inches • AC overlay property • Mix type: Type D; Binder type: PG 76-22 • Modulus Input Level: Level 3-default values • Fracture properties and Rutting properties: default values • Existing AC layer property • Transverse cracking, medium severity, cracking space: 15 ft • FWD modulus @ 77 °F: 500 ksi • Base • Type: CTB, Modulus: 200 ksi • Subgrade • Modulus: By default

  32. Example 1 (Paris Workshop) Result Cracking Rutting

  33. Example 1 (Austin Workshop) • Overlay Type: AC over JPCP • Design or Analysis Life: 15 years • District: Austin; County: Travis • Analysis Parameters & Criteria: Reflective Cracking Rate Limit: 50% AC Rutting: 0.5 inch • Traffic: ADT-Beginning: 20000; ADT-End: 35000; ESALs: 5.0 million; Speed: 60 mph • Weather Station: Austin/City, Tx

  34. Example 1 (Austin Workshop ) (Continued) • Layer thickness • AC overlay: 2.5 inches; Existing JPCP: 9 inches; Base: 4 inches • AC overlay property • Mix type: Type D; Binder type: PG 76-22 • Modulus Input Level: Level 3-default values • Fracture properties and Rutting properties: default values • Existing JPCP property • Modulus: 4000 ksi, cracking space: 15 ft, LTE: 70% • Base • Type: Granular base, Modulus: 50 ksi • Subgrade • Modulus: By default

  35. Exercise 1 • Use “New” function • Change the previous example to 2-lift overlays • The top overlay is the same Type D mix, but its thickness reduces to 1.5 inches • The bottom overlay is 1 inch CAM mix with a PG76-22 binder • All the other inputs are kept the same as Example 1

  36. Exercise 2 • Use “Save as” function • Change the previous exercise back to one lift overlay • Select overlay mix: SMA-D with a PG76-22 binder • Keep all the other inputs the same as Example 1

  37. Exercise 2_Hint • Use “save as” function • Click radio button “1” to remove an overlay (Remember: choose/highlight one overlay first)

  38. Summary for Different Overlay Mixes • 2.5 inches Type D • After 52 months, Reflective Cracking Rate reaches 50%. • Rut depth reaches 0.084 inches after 15 years (180 months). 1.5 inches Type D +1 inch CAM • After 129 months, Reflective Cracking Rate reaches 50%. • Rut depth reaches 0.3inches after 15 years (180 months). 2.5 inches SMA • After 129 months, Reflective Cracking Rate reaches 50%. • Rut depth reaches 0.08 inches after 15 years (180 months).

  39. Example 2 – Overlay Thickness Design • Overlay Type: AC over JPCP • Design Life: 10 years • District: Wichita Falls; County: Cooke • Analysis Parameters & Criteria: Reflective Cracking Rate Limit: 50% AC Rutting: 0.5 inch • Traffic: ADT-Beginning: 19350; ADT-End: 28800; ESALs: 4.5 million; Speed: 60 mph • Weather Station: Wichita Falls, Tx

  40. Example 2 – Overlay Thickness Design (Continued) • Layer thickness • AC overlay: Unknown; Existing JPCP: 8 inches; Base: 4 inches • AC overlay property • Mix type: Type D; Binder type: PG 76-22 • Modulus Input Level: Level 3-default values • Fracture properties and Rutting properties: default values • Existing JPCP property • Modulus: 4000 ksi, joint space: 15 ft, LTE: 70% • Base • Type: Granular base, Modulus: 30 ksi • Subgrade • Modulus: By default

  41. Trial Thicknesses During Design • Overlay thickness trial 1: 2 inches • Overlay thickness trial 2: 4 inches • After 15 months, Reflective Cracking Rate reaches 50%. • Rut depth reaches 0.05 inches after 15 years (180 months). • After 162 months, Reflective Cracking Rate reaches 50%. • Rut depth reaches 0.077 inches after 15 years (180 months).

  42. Trial Thicknesses During Design (Continued) • Overlay thickness trial 3: 3.5 inches • Obviously for all these cases, the rutting problem is not significant. To meet the 10 years design life requirement, a 4 inches overlay is recommended • After 100 months, Reflective Cracking Rate reaches 50%. • Rut depth reaches 0.07 inches after 15 years (180 months).

  43. Exercise 3 • Change the existing JPCP’s LTE to 50% • Keep the other inputs the same as Example 2 • The recommended overlay thickness=?

  44. Answer to Exercise 3 5 inches • Trial 1: 4 inches, 69 months • Trial 2: 5 inches, 148 months • Trial 3: 4.5 inches, 105 months

  45. Tips and Reminders • Accept default values if you don’t have specific test results • Use climatic interpolation function when there is no existing weather station available in this area • Use “save as” to reduce some input work • Save the project file before clicking “Analysis” button • Do not move or rename the project file manually

  46. Presentation Outline • Introduction • Program training and exercises • Key inputs for existing pavement and field testing • Key inputs for overlays and lab test

  47. Key Input Parameters for Existing Pavements • Existing pavements • 1) Layer modulus and 2) Joints/cracks LTE • Field testing • FWD • RDD

  48. JPCP Pavement Evaluation • For Layer modulus backcalculation • center slab • 30 drops per section (max spacing: 0.1 mile) • For LTE • joint measurements • FWD • RDD

  49. FWD Backcalculated Modulus • In Texas, “MODULUS 6.0” is commonly used for modulus backcalculation

  50. FWD Based LTE at Joints/Cracks FWD Load FWD Load W1c W2c W2j W1j LTE = (W2j/W1j)/ (W2c/W1c) Near the slab center Near the joint/crack

More Related