1 / 9

Paula Marentette

Translating knowledge out of the classroom: The highs and lows of Wikipedia as a platform for student writing . Paula Marentette with Juliet Brown, Anastasia Evarts, Erika Heiberg, Alanna Lindsay, Alison Owens, Nadia Rebkowich , Lianne Theelen. T hings we learned about Wiki.

kylene
Download Presentation

Paula Marentette

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Translating knowledge out of the classroom: The highs and lows of Wikipedia as a platform for student writing Paula Marentette with Juliet Brown, Anastasia Evarts, Erika Heiberg, AlannaLindsay, Alison Owens, Nadia Rebkowich, LianneTheelen

  2. Things we learned about Wiki • NPOV: fair and without bias • verifiability: direct support in stated sources We encountered problems with: • NOR: use of material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist”

  3. 1. Primary & secondary sources • NOR: use of material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist” Students were discouraged from using peer-reviewed journal articles: “Wikipedia articles usually rely on material from reliable secondary sources”

  4. 2. synthesis • NOR: use of material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist” students were discouraged from citing multiple sources in one sentence: SYNTH: combination of material from “multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources”

  5. Recognition – Did You Know?

  6. Recognition: Good Article Wiki Criteria: • It is reasonably well-written. • It is factually accurate and verifiable. • It is broad in its coverage. • It follows the neutral point of view policy. • It is stable • It is illustrated by images, where possible.

  7. Good Article

  8. Advice • work in teams for support • do this in a small class • get help with editing early • waiting for feedback is a problem • sort out the citation/reference style!!!! “Take the advice of editors seriously. Swallow your pride and your pithy comments.”

  9. Thanks • APS Wiki Portal (thanks Rosta!) • Wikipedia Canada Education Program (Jonathan) • online ambassadors (Neelix, Nikimaria) • volunteer wiki editors (Mr. Stradivarius, MathewTownsend, MasterOfHisOwnDomain)

More Related