270 likes | 432 Views
ITRS Roadmap Design + System Drivers 2006-7 Worldwide Design TWG. What’s New in 2005 Design & System Drivers. First Design For Manufacturability roadmap DFM roadmap tool Interface with other groups. First worldwide quantitative design technology roadmap System-level Logic/circuit/layout
E N D
ITRS Roadmap Design + System Drivers2006-7 Worldwide Design TWG
What’s New in 2005 Design & System Drivers • First Design For Manufacturability roadmap DFM roadmap tool Interface with other groups • First worldwide quantitative design technology roadmap System-level Logic/circuit/layout Verification DFT DFM • New SoC model captures emerging market driver Consumer driver improves alignment with other roadmaps • Emerging SoC fabric drivers updated Analog & MIxed-signal Embedded memory In next 10 years, new drivers and technology limitations will require design technology overhaul at all abstraction levels
Design: Content organization • Promotion of key design challenges • Small subset of them as top-level ORTC table General Selection Productivity Power DFM Interference Reliability Mapping System design Logic/circuit Physical D Design verification Design Test DFM (new)
Design Technology Cycle (Pre-Production) ~10-year cycle
System-Level Requirements Source: Wolfgang Rosenstiel’s Team
DFM Variability Framework Actual (bottom-up) / required (top-down) variability Performance (delay) Power (energy) “Gate” delay (power) “Wire” delay (power) Intermediate parameters Intermediate parameters (Vdd, T) Rsheet Vt Leff tOX NA Weff L t W tILD Other TWGs (PIDS, Interconnect, etc.)
Roadmapping DFM Issues inc. Variability • Current recommendation • Not to extend 10% CD control beyond 15% • Below 15% still unclear 12% possibly acceptable
ITRS System Drivers Market and Application Alignment • ITRS Design Group focuses on roadmapping • Design Technology challenges and solutions • Drivers for Silicon Systems design • ITRS partially aligned by market/application driver “Fabric” drivers: CPU, DSP/SPU, memory, AMS “Market” drivers: consumer mobile, office • Full alignment will be accomplished in ITRS 2006-7
ITRS-iNEMI Domain Space iNEMI (emulators) Market requirements ITRS (Drivers) Tech requirements Chip level System level
Consumer Portable System Driver(Japan Design TWG) ES Level Methodology Very large block reuse Intelligent testbench Large block reuse Small block reuse Tall thin engineer IC implem. tools In-house P&R General $10,000 $1,000 Selection Productivity Power Manufac. Interference Reliability $100 Design cost ($M) $10 $1 Design process System design Logic/circuit Physical D Design verification Design Test DFM (new) 1990 1996 2000 2002 2004 2010 1992 1994 1998 2006 2008 Mobile /Consumer SoC PE-1 PE-2 … PE-n Main Prc. Memory Updated productivity table cost Peripherals Preserve consistency
Key Driver Trends • Power consumption a first-class constraint Both for portable and non-portable applications • Highly parallel architectures Increasing number of “small” processing unit • System-On-Chip design techniques Assemble lots of pre-designed blocks
--- Overall Requirements (cont.) SOC Requirements
4. System Drivers “Matrix” Alignment Fabrics HP CP MPU 2005 PE(DSP) Size/weight ratio, battery life… Power, interconnect speed… Memory AMS Medical Automotive Office Network Defense Portable [Industrial] Markets
4. System Drivers “Matrix” Alignment Fabrics MPU 2006 PE(DSP) Memory AMS Medical Automotive Office Network Defense Portable [Industrial] Markets
4. System Drivers “Matrix” Alignment Fabrics MPU 2007 PE(DSP) Memory AMS Medical Automotive Office Network Defense Portable [Industrial] Markets
Summary 2005 Design & System Drivers • First Design For Manufacturability roadmap DFM roadmap tool Interface with other groups • First worldwide quantitative design technology roadmap System-level Logic/circuit/layout Verification DFT DFM • New SoC model captures emerging market driver Consumer driver improves alignment with other roadmaps • Emerging SoC fabric drivers updated Analog & MIxed-signal Embedded memory In next 10 years, new drivers and technology limitations will require design technology overhaul at all abstraction levels