550 likes | 947 Views
Announcements. Announcements. Remember: Last Day to Drop is Thursday November 16th. End of Semester Roadmap. Today: Chapter 15 Wrapup Chapter 16Thursday: Chapter 16 (Part 2) and possibly return Exam
E N D
1. Chapter 15 Personality
(Wrapup)
2. Announcements
3. Announcements Remember: Last Day to Drop is Thursday November 16th
4. End of Semester Roadmap Today: Chapter 15 Wrapup + Chapter 16
Thursday: Chapter 16 (Part 2) and possibly return Exam #3
Chapter 17 (Psychotherapy) November 13th and 15th
5. End of Semester Roadmap Chapter 17 (Psychotherapy) November 8th, 13th, and 15th
Chapter 18 (Social Psych) November 15th (“if time permits”)
November 20th Review of Exam 1 Material for the Final
6. End of Semester Roadmap November 20th Review of Exam 1 Material for the Final
November 22nd Thanksgiving Holiday
November 27th Review of Exam 2 Material for the Final
Exam 4: Monday November 26th through Saturday December 1st
November 29th Review of Exam 3 Material for the Final
7. Testing
8. Did anyone try this test? Keirsey
(http://www.keirsey.com/)
9. Rorschach Card 1
10. Testing (Review) Originally Developed from work of Trait Theorists
A few important people in the field of testing
Gordon Allport (Trait Theory)
Eysenck and Eysenck (Read Textbook)
Cattell (Developed 16PF)
Spearman (Developed Statistical Techniques)
11. Testing A few important people in the field of testing
Herman Rorschach (inkblot test)
Alfred Binet (original develop of IQ)
12. Testing Which of the following was NOT an important figure in the field of testing?
Gordon Allport
B F Skinner
Cattell
Alfred Binet
13. Testing Who was the original developer of the IQ test?
Gordon Allport
B F Skinner
Cattell
Alfred Binet
14. Testing: Rorschach Developed by a Swiss Psychiatrist
Ten (10) cards which are highly standardized
A Century Old
Originally suffered from a problems with validity (and possibly reliably)
15. Testing: Rorschach Solving Problems with the Rorschach
John Exner developed a statistical or ‘actuarial’ version of the test called “The Comprehensive System”
16. Rorschach: Exner Although the debate continues over the Rorschach, here are a few notable facts:
As of the early 1990’s data for over 20,000 test administrations had been collected and analyzed.
Of all the projective tests, the Rorschach (by far) has the greatest data collected and greatest number of reliability and validity studies
Only Projective Tests can be used for certain populations
Illiterate Adults
Children under a certain age, usually under about 8 to 10 years of age
17. Rorschach: Exner One persuasive reason to use projective tests such as the Rorschach:
Only Projective Tests can measure subtle aspects of intelligence
Only Projective Tests can detect psychopathology from constellations that include non-obvious items
Only Projective Tests can be used for certain populations
Only Projective Tests can measure the Locus of Control Properly
18. Testing: Factor Analysis Based on Correlation
Part of a family of related statistical techniques including
Principal Components Analysis
Cluster Analysis
Discriminant Analysis (Used in the MMPI)
Canonical Correlation
How “TiVO” predicts what you might “like” to watch on television
How certain music services such as iTunes predict what songs you might like
19. Testing: Discriminant Analysis (Discrim) Used to Build the MMPI
Identifies Group Membership
Could be misused
Possible Ethical Issues
Also used by the financial community (to determine if someone should be given a loan)
20. Testing: Factor Analysis & Discrim Associated with “Data Mining” on the Internet
Controversial in commercial use because of an invasion of privacy
Allows prediction of traits, conduct, or behavior from non-obvious items
For example, FA & Discrim could be used for racist or sexist purposes, or to discriminate on basis of religion
21. Testing: Factor Analysis Associated with many psychological tests, notably
Eysenck Personality Inventory
MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory)
Cattell’s 16PF
Five Factor Personality Inventory
Jackson Personality Inventory
And many others
22. Factor Analysis: Cattel Cattell’s 16PF (Sixteen Personality Factors) was the original “factor analysis” based personality test
23. Testing: Factor Analysis Which of the following was the original factor analysis based personality inventory?
Eysenck Personality Inventory
MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory)
Cattell’s 16PF
Five Factor Personality Inventory
24. Testing: MMPI The MMPI was developed by the University of Minnesota in the 1940’s by Starke R. Hathaway, PhD, and J. C. McKinley,
Based on Discriminant Analysis as well as Factor Analysis
Using Discrim can predict “group membership” using “constellations” of answers
Has non-obvious items that contribute to constellations
Has “Lie Scales”
25. Testing: MMPI Structure of the MMPI:
Built on “constellations” of answers to questions, including obvious and non-obvious (subtle) questions
MMPI-2 has 567 Items, all true or false, takes about 1 to 2 hours to complete
Atheoretical: psychological theories (Freud, Behaviorism, etc.) have no meaning for the MMPI (only Empirical Data)
26. Testing: MMPI Which of the following does NOT describe the MMPI:
Constellations
true or false
Projective
Atheoretical
27. Testing: MMPI Ten (10) Main Scales
Ten (10 Subsidiary Scales
Three (3) Lie Scales
100’s of Independently Developed Scales
28. Testing: MMPI One Independently Developed Scale could predict, with 80% to 90% accuracy, membership in a group based on women in prison who murdered their husbands
29. Testing: Eyesenck Two Scales under Eyesenck & Eyesenck
Stable v. Unstable
Introvert v. Extravert
30. Testing: Five Factor The Five Factor Test expanded the Eyesenck model, keeping Intraversion v. Extraversion but adding four other scales
31. Testing: Five Factors (p. 619) Conscientiousness
Agreeableness
Neuroticism
Openness
Extraversion
32. Testing: Five Factors(p. 619) Highly Conscientiousness tend to be “larks” (morning types)
Evening types, or “owls,” tend to be marginally more extraverted
33. Testing: Five Factors(p. 619) Five Factor Test has withstood Cross-Cultural Validation
Personality Factors are relatively stable with age
34. Testing: Five Factors(p. 619) The Five Factor was developed using
Canonical Correlation
Projective Testing
Depth Psychology
Factor Analysis
35. Testing: Validity & Reliability Two essential characteristics of a good test are validity and reliability
Reliability: test produces same or similar results over time
Validity: test measures what it says it measures
36. Trait v. Situation (p. 619) Personality Trait measures are stable over time but do not consistently predict our reactions in specific situations
37. Trait v. Situation (p. 619) Personality Trait measures are stable over time but do not consistently predict our reactions in specific situations; this is called the “person-situation controversy” (p. 620)
38. Trait v. Situation (p. 619) Arguments as to whether people’s behavior is more strongly influenced by temporary external influences or by enduring inner influences best characterize:
Reciprocal Determinism
The person-situation controversy
Self-serving bias
The False Consensus Effect
39. Trait v. Situation (p. 619) Please review the material on pp. 619-622 on your own. The possiblity exists that I may derive one or two alternative questions from this material.
Especially know and be able to compare the studies of Walter Mischel, Seymour Epstein, and Samuel Gosling
40. Reciprocal Determinism (p. 623) Bandura (remember Bandura?) called the process of interacting with our environment reciprocal determinism.
“Behavior, internal personal factors, and environmental influences all operate as inerlocking determinants of each other.”
41. Reciprocal Determinism (pp. 623-624) Different people choose different environments (we self-select)
And, having chosen an environment, the environment then shapes us
How would this apply to environments that we do not choose?
Our personalities (traits) shape how we interpret and react to events
Our personalities help create situations to which we react
42. Reciprocal Determinism (pp. 623-624) Behavior emerges from an interplay of external and internal influences
But, never forget Development (Chapter Four) and Sensation & Perception (Chapters Five & Six)
43. Locus of Control (pp. 625-626) External Locus of Control: perception that chance or outside forces beyond one’s personal control determine one’s fate
Internal Locus of Control: the perception one controls one’s own fate
44. Locus of Control: Learned Helplessness First researched by Seligman
“People, when repeatedly faced with traumatic events over which they have no control, come to feel helpless, hopeless, and depressed.”
But, compare, (1) Learned Optimism, and (2) Frankl’s Logotherapy
45. Locus of Control: Learned Helplessness Implications for
Prisons
Nursing Homes
Factories
Even Colleges
46. Locus of Control: The Tyranny of Choice “Having Control,” alone, is not the answer. Barry Schwartz, in The Tyranny of Choice, points out that “excessive freedom” (too many choices) leads to more stress, not less. (p. 626)
Simplified User Interfaces are having greater success:
TiVO
Google
47. Locus of Control: Learned Helplessness First researched by Seligman using dogs subjected to electric shocks
“People, when repeatedly faced with traumatic events over which they have no control, come to feel helpless, hopeless, and depressed.”
But, compare, (1) Learned Optimism, and (2) Frankl’s Logotherapy
48. Learned Optimism: Seligman We have covered the basics of Seligman’s work several times in class already
Please read the material on pp. 627-629 and be prepared for one or more questions
49. Learned Optimism: Seligman (p. 627) Seligman is at the University of Pennsylvania (an Ivy League School)
Seligman first researched Learned Helplessness
Seligman’s original work did not account for “survivors” among his test subjects
Seligman developed a test instrument with three dimensions that measured attributional style
50. Learned Optimism: Seligman (p. 627) Seligman’s Three Dimensions of Attributional Style
Internal v. External (Locus of Control)
Global v. Local
Stable v. Unstable
Optimist
Good Events are Internal, Global, Stable
Bad Events are External, Local, & Unstable
51. Learned Optimism: Seligman (p. 627) Optimist
Good Events are Internal, Global, Stable
Bad Events are External, Local, & Unstable
Pessimist
Good Events are External, Local & Unstable
Bad Events are Internal, Global, & Stable
52. Learned Optimism: Seligman (p. 627) Optimist
“Good things happen to me a lot, because I consistently do what it takes.”
“Sometimes bad things happen, but I don’t worry about things I can’t control.”
Pessimist
“All good things must pass.”
“I can’t seem to help but make mistakes in every area of my life.”
53. Learned Optimism: Seligman (p. 627) Optimist
Generally had better health
Generally had better job performance
Optimists outperformed Pessimists consistently across hundreds of studies
Pessimist
In only one group did the pessimists outperform the optimists: GPA’s of Law Students
54. Learned Optimism: Seligman (p. 627) Regarding Optimism, an attributional style described by Seligman’s research, in only one subpopulation did pessimists outperform optimists
Life Insurance Salesman in their first year of sales
College Graduates and their health data five years out of school
The GPA of Law Students
None of the Above
55. Next Time: Be prepared for a PopQuiz
Chapter 16
Possibly Review Exam #3
56. Finis