1 / 22

Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB

Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB. K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii 20-23 Apr. 2005. Luminosity limit. Fundamental limit due to the beam-beam interaction. Super B factories target the fundamental limit. How high is the beam-beam limit?

kyne
Download Presentation

Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii 20-23 Apr. 2005

  2. Luminosity limit • Fundamental limit due to the beam-beam interaction. • Super B factories target the fundamental limit. • How high is the beam-beam limit? • The beam-beam limit is discussed in two papers, K. Ohmi et al, PRL 92, 214801 (2004). Beam-beam limit in Super KEKB K. Ohmi et al, PRST 7, 104401 (2004). Crossing angle effect in KEKB • The beam-beam limit can be understood by using strong-strong simulation (based on the Particle in cell method). • Design of super KEKB is discussed from the view of the beam-beam limit using the simulation.

  3. Parameter table of super KEKB KEKB

  4. Tune scan • Bunch luminosity v.s. tune • Total luminosity = 5000x bunch luminosity • Green line sketches progress of KEKB. Ltot = 4x1035 cm-2 s-1 By M. Tawada

  5. Luminosity evolution • Equilibrium state is realized for equal damping times. • Design damping time is 4000 and 6000 turns for HER and LER, respectively. • Slow luminosity decrease is observed for unequal damping times. bx=30 cm 20cm

  6. Difference of the damping time • Beam size asymmetry and luminosity decrease arise. • Emittance equalization is required. Equal damping time (6000 turn) 4000 (HER) & 6000 (LER) turn

  7. What disturb to achieve the fundamental beam-beam limit? • Nonlinear diffusion • Linear coupling of arc • Nonlinearity of arc lattice • External diffusion • Phase jitter of crab and accelerating cavities • Feedback noise • Parasitic interaction • Other issues • Heating, bunch lengthening, electron cloud …

  8. Optics error at the collision point • One turn map is multiplication of beam-beam interaction and map of arc section. • Total luminosity performance is determined by the map of arc section, which is controllable by us. • X-y coupling, dispersion (xy-d coupling) and crossing angle (x-z coupling) • A symplectic diffusion is induced by the couplings. Mixing of degree of freedom seems to enhance Arnold diffusion.

  9. Vertical dispersion Gaussian approx. • Diffusion behavior due to dispersion in a system without synchrotron radiation. • Luminosity and beam size are degraded. PIC simulation

  10. X-y coupling Gaussian approx. • Diffusion due to x-y coupling. • Luminosity and beam size degradation. PIC simulation

  11. Crossing angle • Crossing angle is equivalent to x-z coupling. • Diffusion and luminosity degradation due to crossing angle Gaussian approx. PIC simulation

  12. Nonlinear terms • Effect of chromaticity, dn/dd, db/dd, da/dd, has been studied. • The effect was very weak for dn/dd ~7. • Life time degradation may be issue. • Higher nonlinearity using a Taylor map will be included in the beam-beam simulation. • Detailed studies will be done.

  13. External diffusion: Vertical offset noise • Since the beam-beam system is chaotic, such noise enhances the diffusion of the system. • Luminosity degradation for the noise without correlation between turns.

  14. Orbit offset (static) • Static vertical offset. Tolerance is easier than the fast noise. • For slower variation than radiation damping time, emittance can be an adiabatic invariant.

  15. Phase jitters of RF systems: horizontal offset noise • Noise of RF system. Deviation of RF phase, dj. • Phase error between two crab cavities. • The transverse offset affects the beam-beam performance.

  16. Effect on the beam-beam performance of the phase jitter of RF’s • Luminosity and beam size as functions of dx. • Correlation time of the jitter, 1 or 10 turns, is important for the degradation. • Since Q=200,000 and H=5120, the correlation time will be larger than 10 turns. • Tolerance is 0.05 degree.

  17. Parasitic collision • Nonlinear force (~1/r) with very large amplitude • Separation at the parasitic collision • Dynamic beta and emittance (simulation)

  18. Luminosity with or without parasitic interaction • In fixed parasitic beam model, no effect is observed. • When parasitic beam is treated as soft Gaussian, a stable solution was not obtained by beam loss at the early stage (unmatched). • It may be critical situation, especially forthe beamlife time or injection.

  19. Toward Higher luminosityHigher bunch currentwith keeping total current • Luminosity saturates for increasing bunch current. Beam-beam limit. • Only HOM loss increases.

  20. Toward higher luminosity, 1036 cm-2 s-1 • Two beam collision is limited by strong nonlinear diffusion coupled to synchrotron radiation around 4x1035 cm-2 s-1 . • Compensation scheme is one of limited choices. • Our first study (Ohnishi & Ohmi) did not give better results than that of the two beam collision.

  21. 4 eigenmodes of four-beam collision Rich unstable mode and no Landau damping x,y No tune shift n=n0 z Focusing n=n0+x Defocusing n=n0-x Unstable modes

  22. Summary • Design and tolerance for Ltot = 4x1035 cm-2 s-1 were studied. • Reduce optics error at the collision point. Maybe acceptable. • Reduce external diffusions especially those with fast frequency component. • Arc nonlinearity and life time issues will be studied soon by collaboration with BINP (D. Shatilov). • Efforts on higher luminosity are continued.

More Related