1 / 22

Recycling

A presentation at the 3 rd Asphalt Shingles Recycling Forum On Friday, November 2, 2007 In Chicago. Off . Recycling . Tear. Asphalt Shingles:. Best . Practices Guide. October 11, 2007. Acknowledgments. U.S. EPA staff: Julie Gevrenov Paul Ruesch Bill Turley, CMRA Deb Haugen

kyoko
Download Presentation

Recycling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A presentationat the3rd Asphalt Shingles Recycling ForumOn Friday,November 2, 2007 In Chicago Off Recycling Tear Asphalt Shingles: Best Practices Guide October 11, 2007

  2. Acknowledgments U.S. EPA staff: Julie Gevrenov Paul Ruesch Bill Turley, CMRA Deb Haugen Innovative Waste Consulting Services: Dr. Tim Townsend Jon Powell, et . al.

  3. Acknowledgments(Case studies) • Sean Anestis, Roof Top Recycling • Ken Snow, Recycle America Enterprises • John Adelman, Commercial Paving & Recycling Systems • Ron Sines, PJ Keating

  4. Acknowledgements (Additional case studies, resources, and peer reviwer*) • Dusty Ordorff, Bituminous Roadways • Jim Omann, Omann Brothers • Roger Brown, Pace Construction ** • Joe Schroer, MoDOT * • Mn/DOT • NAPA

  5. BPG Peer Reviewers John AdelmanCommercial Paving & Recycling CorporationScarborough, ME U.S. EPA Staff: Dr. Kimberly Cochran Truett DeGeare and David Carver Julie Gevrenov Paul Ruesch

  6. BPG Peer Reviewers(continued) Gary DavisRecycling & Processing Equipment, Inc.Peru, IN Charles FandaleFlorida Shingle Recycling, LLCBradenton, FL Dr. Jenna JambeckRecycled Materials Resource Center (RMRC)Durham, NH Jenna KundeWasteCap Wisconsin, Inc.Milwaukee, WI

  7. We welcomeyour continued comments!

  8. BP#1: Recyclers handling tear – off shingles should carefully plan and implement a supply quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) system.

  9. BP#2: Tear – off shingle recyclers should optimize their operations to produce a RAS product that meets or exceeds specifications of their end markets.

  10. BP#3: Tear – off shingle recyclers should develop a comprehensive marketing plan based on multiple outlets.

  11. “Supply” BP’s 1.1 Written specification 1.2 Clean tear-off scrap only 1.3 Must be free of ACM 1.5 Certification and sorting

  12. “Supply” BP’s(continued) 1.6 Sort shingles from non-shingle debris 1.8 No hazardous waste permitted. If found, charge back to supplier.

  13. “Supply” BP’s(continued) 1.12 Must follow NESHAP: * Asbestos management plans * No ACM 1.13 Consider restricting initial supply to “non-regulated facilities” 1.14 Written, signed certification

  14. “Supply” BP’s(continued) 1.18 Each load must be inspected 1.19 Mutually acceptable asbestos testing plan 1.20 Initial asbestos lab data should establish “baseline” (* See Appendix D) 1.21 Random and unannounced testing for ongoing sampling procedure

  15. “Processing” BP’s 2.1 Meet or exceed market specifications Maximize TPH and capacity 2.3 Elevated sort line 2.5 Agency inspections 2.6 Maximize protection of worker health and safety

  16. “Processing” BP’s(continued) 2.9 Provide workers with best available information about asbestos risks 2.10 Dust control plan 2.11 Water 2.12 Dust control devices on grinders and other processing equipment (e.g., loaders should be equipped with enclosed, air conditioned cabs)

  17. “Processing” BP’s(continued) 2.13 Standard protective clothing and personal safety equipment 2.15 Invite OSHA staff to visit / inspect

  18. “Marketing” BP’s 3.1 Short-term and long-term marketing plans 3.2 Guarantee RAS to be: a) Asbestos free b) Nail free c) In specified mix ratios

  19. “Marketing” BP’s(continued) 3.3 Internal sampling and testing as part of larger QA/QC program 3.4 Data feedback from customers 3.6 State DOT and academic institutions may wish to consider additional testing

  20. “Marketing” BP’s(continued) 3.7 Recyclers should advocate for state and local government owner / agencies to use “affirmative, environmentally preferable procurement” policies that give preference for RAS - derived HMA.

  21. CMRA’s Web Site

  22. Dan KrivitDKA DKrivit@bitstream.net651-489-4990

More Related