1 / 12

Settlements

Settlements. Wouter Wils * BIICL, 15 May 2008 * All views expressed are strictly personal. Definition: settlement =. disposal by a competition authority of a case of suspected antitrust infringement through a specific procedure, or in application of a policy,

kyrene
Download Presentation

Settlements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Settlements Wouter Wils * BIICL, 15 May 2008 * All views expressed are strictly personal.

  2. Definition: settlement = disposal by a competition authority of a case of suspected antitrust infringement through a specific procedure, or in application of a policy, under which some benefit is granted to the defendant in recognition of the defendant’s admission or non-contestation of the infringement and/or offer or acceptance of remedies and/or penalties BIICL, 15 May 2008

  3. Definition (II): settlement = • distinct from leniency (remission or reduction of a penalty in recognition of the defendant’s voluntary provision of intelligence and evidence of the infringement) • US plea-bargaining = combination of leniency (for not-first-in) and settlement BIICL, 15 May 2008

  4. European Commission experience with settlements • exemption decisions with conditions and obligations Article 8(1) of Regulation 17 • informal settlements e.g. IBM case 1984 • commitment decisions Article 9 of Regulation 1/2003 • proposed new settlement procedure in cartel cases public consultation Oct.-Dec. 2007 BIICL, 15 May 2008

  5. proposed new settlement procedure in cartel cases • proposed new Article 10a of Regulation 773/2004 and Notice on settlement procedure in cartel cases • optional alternative procedure leading to (stream-lined) decision based on Articles 7 and 23 of Regulation 1/2003 (finding of infringement and imposition of fine) BIICL, 15 May 2008

  6. proposed new settlement procedure in cartel cases (II) • no negotiation on question of the existence of the infringement and the appropriate fine • but defendants are heard on the potential objections and on the range of likely fines (in the light of the Guidelines on fines and Leniency Notice) during settlement discussions (exercise of rights of defence) BIICL, 15 May 2008

  7. proposed new settlement procedure in cartel cases (III) • defendants must acknowledge the infringement and their liability, accept the likely fines and waive some procedural rights (further access to the file and oral hearing after the statement of objections, separate counsel for companies within same undertaking, language), but not the right to appeal to the EU Courts • fixed percentage reduction of the fine (below the normal fine under the Guidelines on fines and Leniency Notice) BIICL, 15 May 2008

  8. balance of enforcement gains and losses if fines are reduced by 10 % (33 %), and all cases are settled, deterrence increases if (and only if) the increase in the number of cartels detected and fined, resulting from the saved resources, exceeds 11 % (50 %) BIICL, 15 May 2008

  9. settlements and fundamental rights of the defence question: are the self-incrimination and waiver of procedural rights by settlement candidates, and the encouragement thereof through settlement rewards compatible with the privilege against self-incrimination and other fundamental rights of the defence ? BIICL, 15 May 2008

  10. settlements and fundamental rights of the defence (II) answer: yes, if the self-incrimination and waiver of procedural rights are voluntary, implying both adequate knowledge and absence of improper compulsion BIICL, 15 May 2008

  11. settlements and fundamental rights of the defence (III) • a settlement does not become involuntary merely because a penalty reduction below the normal penalty level is offered, provided that the reduction is not too large cf. European Court of Human Rights, Borghi v Italy (20 June 2002) & Deweer v Belgium (27 Febr. 1980) BIICL, 15 May 2008

  12. more in writing … paper « The Use of Settlements in Public Antitrust Enforcement: Objectives and Principles » soon available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=456087 BIICL, 15 May 2008

More Related