290 likes | 407 Views
Chattin ’ ‘bout My Generation: Virtual Reference Use from Millennials to Boomers. Marie L. Radford, Ph.D. Associate Professor Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist OCLC. Reference Renaissance 2010, August 8-10, 2010.
E N D
Chattin’ ‘bout My Generation: Virtual Reference Use from Millennials to Boomers Marie L. Radford, Ph.D. Associate Professor Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist OCLC Reference Renaissance 2010, August 8-10, 2010
Seeking Synchronicity: Evaluating VR Services from User, Non-User, & Librarian Perspectives IMLS, Rutgers, OCLC funded Focus group interviews Transcript analysis (850) Online surveys (496) 175 VRS librarians, 184 VRS non-users, 137 VRS users Telephone interviews (283) 100 VRS librarians, 107 VRS non-users, 76 VRS users
The Millennials • Born 1979 - 1994 • Net Gen • EchoBoomers • Gen Y • 75 million people • Socially networked environment • Different communication & information-seeking behaviors
Screenagers/Digital Natives • Youngest of Millennials • Born 1988 -1994 • Technology affinity • Expect instant access
Focus Groups with Screenagers Prefer • Google • Other search engines • Browse web • Ask friends • Or find information themselves
Focus Groups with Screenagers - More • Never used phone to call a librarian for homework help • Unaware that their library had phone reference service • None would ever email a librarian
Focus Groups – Reasons For Not Using VRS • IM for socializing, not for serious pursuits • Unaware VRS existed • Fear chat librarians would ignore them, not understand or not care about their information needs • Serious privacy & security concerns
Chat Least Intimidating to VRS Users Millennials (N=49) Older Adults (N=88)
Recommendation Important to VRS UsersMillennials (N=49) • Used VRS because recommended • Recommended VRS more than older adults
Why Users Don’t Always Choose VRSMillennials (N=49) Unhelpful answers Non-subject specialists Slow connections Scripted messages Cold environment
What Would Attract Users to VRS More Frequently?Millennials (N=49) Faster & easier software Personalized interface More service hours Kiosk & cybercafe access Experienced, friendly, tech-savvy librarians
Why Don’t Non-Users Choose VRS?Millennials (N=122) • Don’t know it is available • Believe librarian couldn’t help • Lack of 24/7 service • Satisfied w/ other info sources
Face-to-Face Preference (FtF)Non-Users Online Survey (N=184)
FtF vs. Other Formats: Non-Users Online SurveyMillennials (N=122)
Personal Relationships ImportantValue Interactions with Specific Librarians Non-Users Online Survey (N=184)
Librarian Friendliness & Politeness Valued Non-Users Online Survey (N=184)
Reasons for Not Choosing VRSNon-users Online Survey • Fear questions might annoy librarian • Don’t believe librarian can help • Didn’t know VRS existed • Satisfied with other sources By Flickr® user RodBegbie http://www.flickr.com/photos/groovymother/3970469139/
Reasons to Use VRSNon-Users Online Survey • Non-users might try VRS • If they could receive information quickly • 24/7/365 By Flickr® user mag3737 http://www.flickr.com/photos/mag3737/452838421
Reasons for Not Choosing VRS Non Users Phone Interviews Unaware VRS existed or how to access: “I think I am unfamiliar with it… I stray away from the unknown I guess.” (Millennial) “I don’t know how to access computer library service. When I need to look something up I use Google.” (Older Adult)
Summary of Results Online Surveys & Phone Interviews Most important for success • Accuracy • Correct answers • Convenience • Delivery • Highly Valued • Knowledgeable • Positive attitude • Communication skills
Discussion & Implications • Unaware of service • Convenience important • Prefer FtF • Online sources more convenient • Satisfied with other sources • May use if available 24/7
Discussion & Implications Millennials vs. Older Adults Millennials • Value convenience & online access (sources & services) • Value friendliness • Concerned questions annoying • Older Adults • Chat too complicated • Typing skills not adequate
Encourage Future Users – What We Can Do • Creative marketing • Promote range of options & convenience • Teach VR in Info. Literacy • Observe their use patterns • System development
Recognize & Respond to User Differences & Preferences • Different generations = different behaviors • Personalized interfaces • Emphasize personal service • Build positive relationships FtF, phone, or online
End Notes This is one of the outcomes from the project Seeking Synchronicity: Evaluating Virtual Reference Services from User, Non-User, and Librarian Perspectives Funded by IMLS, Rutgers University, & OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Project web site:http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/synchronicity/default.htm