250 likes | 368 Views
Planning for Housing The private sector perspective John Acres Director of Planning (Sustainable Development). Who are the Catesby Property Group?. Catesby has property interests throughout the country - commercial, mixed use and residential
E N D
Planning for HousingThe private sectorperspectiveJohn Acres Director of Planning (Sustainable Development)
Who are the Catesby Property Group? • Catesby has property interests throughout the country - commercial, mixed use and residential • Catesby assembles, promotes and develops land and secures planning consent for sale of land to house-builders and developers • Catesby ispromoting land for 3200 dwellings and 50ha employment land at Newark.
What am I going to cover? Planning for Housing • The story so far • Where are we now • Where are we going • What is the outlook for • planning, • the economy • society
The story so far.. • Carol Spelman’s letter – Aug 2009 – collusion? • Open Source planning – Feb 2010 – concoction • An ‘arranged marriage’ – May 2010 - coalition • The ‘Pickles’ letter – 27th May 2010 – confusion • Revocation of RSS’s – July 2010 - conspiracy! • The ‘Cala’ decision – Nov 2010 - condemnation • The Localism Bill – Dec 2010 - conclusion
House of Commons Select Committee‘Abolition of RSS’s – A planning vacuum’ “Having taken 30 years to build up the strategic planning system and perhaps 3 years to prepare each Regional Plan, it has taken literally 3 months to abandon the whole process and create a situation of complete paralysis in the planning system.” Para 3: Introduction.
Regional House price trend(East Midlands compared with England)
Housing starts & completions(England, 12 month rolling total).
Share prices(Comparison between major house-builders and FTSE share index)
Core strategies - progress The numbers game! Number of adopted Core Strategies In England In East Midlands 81 5
Where are we now? Strategic planning – the baby has been thrown out with the bathwater! Planning in limbo – Localism Bill The implications of Cala 1 & 2 (& 3) Kneejerk decisions Less support, changes in structures Coping with cuts – losses of jobs The market in the doldrums Confusion & delay
Key pointers for change • The Budget statement. “ The planning system has held back investment and created distortions in the way that business compete, deterring development and growth”. • Eric Pickles: “LPA’s and other bodies involved in granting development consents should prioritise growth and jobs… with immediate effect.” • Greg Clarke: “The answer to development and growth should wherever possible be ‘yes’”. • Steve Quartermain: “This statement is a material planning consideration”
Localism Bill • What’s in? • Abolition of regional Planning • Abolish IPC – SOS decision • Duty to Co-operate • Neighbourhood Planning • Local Referenda • Community Right to Build • Community Right to Challenge • Removal of Pre-determination rule/tightening penalties • What’s out? • National Spatial Plan • Presumption in favour of Devt. • Housing targets • Any change to primacy of Local Plans • Third Party rights of Appeal • Neighbour compensation • Local Enterprise Partnerships (non statutory)
Where are we going? The longer term outlook.
Impact on Planning(Will things be more or less plan led?) • Less certainty – more flexibility • Less co-ordination – more variation • Less needs based – more opportunity based • Less influence from planners – more influence from politicians/local people • Less professionalism – more parochialism • Less staff – more work to do!!
Impact on the Economy(Is the Bill pro-growth or not?) • Less certainty = more reluctance to invest • Less public investment = more pressure on private sector • Less bureaucracy = potentially less costs and more freedom • Losing a layer in the hierarchy = quicker decisions • Localism may = more uncertainty, but may = closer private/public sector relationships.
Impact on Society(Will it help foster the Big Society?) • Will it promote more genuine community involvement? • If so, will it create more tensions in planning? • Who will undertake & pay for neighbourhood planning? • Will it work in the urban areas? • Will it promote survival of the fittest approach? • Who will be the winners/losers? • Does ‘Big Society’ – mean lots of little societies?