1 / 20

OGC GeoPackage Encoding Standard

®. OGC GeoPackage Encoding Standard . Paul Daisey GeoPackage SWG Chair, Editor July 22nd 2014 MITE meeting. Problem – Why GeoPackage?.

laksha
Download Presentation

OGC GeoPackage Encoding Standard

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ® OGC GeoPackage Encoding Standard Paul Daisey GeoPackage SWG Chair, Editor July 22nd 2014 MITEmeeting

  2. Problem – Why GeoPackage? • Effective, large-scale collaboration in military, homeland security, and disaster management relies upon the sharing of geospatial information. • However, this is significantly constrained under conditions of limited or non-existent bandwidth or power. • An explosion of map applications for mobile handheld devices has resulted in a variety of incompatible dataformats and interfaces. • No existing standardaddresses the provisioning of all types of geospatial data on traditional computing platforms or assorted makes of mobile handheld devices.

  3. Geopackage: Raster Maps, Images and Feature Data in One File Imagery Low – High Resolution Feature Data Raster Maps: Small – Large Scale Tile Pyramids 22 zoom levels Single File Sqlite Database containing all data for direct-use on mobile platforms & handheld devices

  4. GeoPackage Inception • Concept initiated by scientists and engineers from AGC/TEC and NGA at a hosted TEM with open source and commercial software developers • Initial start as Google Groups Discussions • OGC Web Services Phase 9 (OWS-9) • Developed initial draft spec and prototype applications • Brought initial work and google group members to OGC because of need for stds development structure and potential IPR concerns. • GeoPackage SWG Established October 2012 • 14 Voting Members, 65 Non-voting Members and Observers • SWG Portal and SWG WIKI documenting • Teleconferences, Discussion Items, Change Requests

  5. GeoPackage Evolution (1) • OGC Web Services Phase 9 (OWS-9) (2013) • Informal Public Review of Draft Spec January 2013 • SWG Resolved 59 Issues (Public Comments) & 74 Issues (SWG Members) • Three Initial Implementations (Luciad, OpenGeo, AGC R&D) • OGC RFC formal Public Review of Draft Spec August 2013 • SWG Resolved 19 Issues (Public Comments) & 12 Issues from SWG Members • OGC Web Services Phase 10 (OWS-10) (current) • Open Mobility Thread • GeoPackaging Service Reference Implementation • GeoPackage Synchronization with WMS, WFS, WMTS • Mobile GeoPackage and OWS Context Client App • OGC TC and PC vote (Approved Feb 2014) • Published as traditional .pdf document http://www.geopackage.org/ -and- http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/geopackage • Also, available online in GitHub repository for software developers https://github.com/opengis/geopackage

  6. GeoPackage Evolution (2) • GeoPackage SWG Charter Revision • SWG Deliverables • One corrigendum revision of the GeoPackage Encoding Standard • GeoPackage Implementation Guide Best Practices Document • OWS Context Document Guide for GeoPackage Best Practices Document • CRPs for the GeoPackage and other OGC Standards • CITE TEAM Engine TestNG ETS for the GeoPackage Encoding Standard and its SQLite Configuration and SQLite Extension • One or more revisions of the GeoPackage Encoding Standard • Approved by SWG 2014-06-24 • OGC TC Review period ended 2014-07-15

  7. U.S. DoD / IC GeoPackage Activities • R&D Organizations using GeoPackage in Apps • AGC ERDC • NGA Mobile Apps • DARPA TransApps • NSG Adopts OGC Standard • Review w/in NSG GWG (Standards GeoINT Working Group) • Vote Summer 2014 • Submit as DISR Standard 14-2 • DOD/IC Profile of Geopackage Spec. • AGC • NGA • DISA • DARPA • Additional Capabilities in Future Version(s)

  8. GeoPackage Potential Future Work • GeoPackage potential extensions • Elevation Data (lots of interest expressed) • Routes (initiated requirements/use-case work but much to do.) • Data Import / Export Utilities • Geographic / Geodesic geometry types • Additional Image MIME types (e.g. JPEG2000) • Abstract Object Model and Non-SQL Encoding • Symbology and Styling • UTFGrid support • Other Standards & potential extensions (e.g. OWS-10) • GeoPackaging OGC Web Service • Other OGC Web Services use GeoPackages for input / output, synchronization, perhaps using OGC Context document descriptors

  9. DoD / IC GPKG Profile Draft Issues • Tiles • Additional Bounding Boxes for Tiles • Tile Sizes / Zoom Level Well Known Scale Sets • Tiles and Features • Metadata (Need SME input!) • Specified Spatial Reference Systems (SRS) and Well Known Text (WKT) Definitions • Features • Coordinate Transformation Functions SQLite Extension • SQL-MM Geometry Functions SQLite Extension • NAS/GGDM Features Schema –> SQL Table Definitions • Standard Registered Extensions - Required instead of Optional • Data Integrity Validation Tests / Additional Triggers • Data Column Constraints • Specify Profile as GeoPackage Extensions

  10. GPKG Additional Tile Pyramid Bounding Boxes • GPKG has per-table bounding boxes • This extension adds an nsg_tile_matrix_extent table to contain additional bounding boxes specifying more detailed rectangular extents of tile image availability • Provide bounding boxes for every tile in a fully populated or sparse tile pyramid as a pre-computed cache of tile extent information as a space/time trade-off to avoid repeatedly computing individual tile bounds from the gpkg_tile_matrix_set table minimum bounding box and tile size, zoom level, and row and column position. • Provide bounding boxes that indicate where complete tiles of tile image data are available in a sparse tile pyramid. • Provide bounding boxes that indicate where tiles are missing in a sparse tile pyramid. • Provide bounding boxes that indicate rectangular extents of the presence of tile image data in one or more tiles. • Provide bounding boxes that indicate rectangular extents of the absence of tile image data in one or more tiles • Provide bounding boxes that indicate rectangular extents of mixed areas where tile image data is both present and absent in non-rectangular patterns.

  11. Tile Bounding Box Use Cases

  12. GPKG Tile Sizes / Zoom Level Well Known Scale Sets (1) • Only specified tile sizes? • 256 x 256? Commercial practice, NettWarrior • 512 x 512? Naval Research Lab Ghub • Rectangular for Polar Regions in UPS? • Standardize zoom levels / pixel sizes? (following slides) • Only times two zoom levels? • Also zoom other intervals? • Current Draft: 256 x 256 times two zoom

  13. GPKG Tile Sizes / Zoom Level Well Known Scale Sets (2) • General well known scale sets (from OGC WMTS) • GlobalCRS84Scale • for vector cartographic products • pixel size in degrees • zoom other intervals • GlobalCRS84Pixel • for raster cartographic products • pixel sizes in meters • zoom other intervals • some zoom levels pixel sizes match STRM (1" and 3"), GTOPO (30") or ETOPO (2' and 5'). • GoogleCRS84Quad * • for earth images • pixel sizes in degrees • zoom times 2 • tiles of 256x256 pixels • GoogleMapsCompatible(Microsoft Live Compatible) * • for rasterized maps • pixel sizes in meters • zoom times 2 • tiles of 256x256 pixels * GPKG WKSS alignment

  14. GPKG Tile Sizes / Zoom Level Well Known Scale Sets (3) * Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) and Universal Polar Stereographic (UPS) TBD * scale denominator and pixel size values are only accurate near the equator.

  15. GPKG Tile Sizes / Zoom Level Well Known Scale Sets (4) • For existing DoD products

  16. GPKG Spatial Reference Systems • Geographic 3D • WGS 84 lat/lon/hae (HRE ¹) • Geographic 2D • WGS84 lat/lon • Projected Horizontal • World Mercator ² • Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) • Universal Polar Stereographic (UPS) • Vertical ³ • EGM 2008 geoid height / depth • EGM 1996 geoid height / depth • Mean Sea Level (MSL) height / depth • Compound • Geo 2D / Projected + Vertical combinations ¹ NGA.IP.0002_1.0(HRE) ² NOT Spherical (Web) Mercator per NGA.SIG.0011_1.0.0_WEBMERC ³ http://earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/publications/vertdatum.html

  17. Features • Coordinate Transformation Functions SQLite Extension • SQL-MM Geometry Functions SQLite Extension • NAS/GGDM Features Schema –> SQL Table Definitions • Standard Registered Extensions - Required instead of Optional • Data Integrity Validation Tests / Additional Triggers • Data Column Constraints

  18. GPKG Coordinate Conversion and Transformation Functions - Optional SQLite Extension • SQL function signature derived from ISO SQL/MMST_Transform method * • ST_Transform(geom StandardGeoPackageBinary, toSrid INTEGER) (required) • ST_Transform(geom ExtendedGeoPackageBinary, toSrid INTEGER) (conditional) • (required if ExtendedGeoPackageBinary registered extension implemented) • Any Implementation Code / Library that uses parameter values from gpkg_spatial_ref_sys table definition column • NGA GEOTRANS * GOTS Extension • PROJ.4 Open Source • Other Commercial or Open Source • GEOTRANS * results are the reference implementation • Abstract Test Suite (ATS) reference data to be derived from GEOTRANS and NGA Gold Data * ISO/IEC 13249-3 * http://earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/geotrans/#zza3 * http://earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/coordsys/Conversion_Software/index.html

  19. Questions ?

  20. Contacts • Paul Daisey SWG Chair, Editor 301-651-7148 pauld@imagemattersllc.com • Jeff Harrison SWG Co-Chair 703-628-8655 jharrison@thecarbonproject.com • Kevin Backe 703-428-6505 Kevin.Backe@usace.army.mil

More Related