1 / 22

ECE-8843 ece.gatech/~copeland/jac/8843-03/ Prof. John A. Copeland

ECE-8843 http://www.ece.gatech.edu/~copeland/jac/8843-03/ Prof. John A. Copeland john.copeland@ece.gatech.edu 404 894-5177 fax 404 894-0035 Office: GCATT Bldg 579 email or call for office visit, or call Kathy Cheek, 404 894-5696 Chapter 5a - Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) Email.

lali
Download Presentation

ECE-8843 ece.gatech/~copeland/jac/8843-03/ Prof. John A. Copeland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ECE-8843 http://www.ece.gatech.edu/~copeland/jac/8843-03/ Prof. John A. Copeland john.copeland@ece.gatech.edu 404 894-5177 fax 404 894-0035 Office: GCATT Bldg 579 email or call for office visit, or call Kathy Cheek, 404 894-5696 Chapter 5a - Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) Email

  2. Electronic Mail In 1982, ARPANET email proposals were published as RFC 821 (www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0821.txt) and RFC 822 • Email services since are based on these RFC's • CCITT X.400 & ISO MOTIS grew and waned as competitors • "User Agents" UA, and "Message Transfer Agents" MTA Three parts to an email message: • Envelope - information used to forward the contents • Header - standard strings, some added in route. > To: Cc: Bcc: From: Sender: > Received: (added in route), Return-Path: (by final MTA) > MIME headers added by RFC 1341 and 1521 > A. S. Tanenbaum, "Computer Networks," (3rd ed.) p.651 2

  3. MIME Headers Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) RFC 1341 and RFC 1521 • MIME -Version: version number • Content-Description: human-readable string • Content-ID: unique identifier • Content-Transfer-Encoding: body encoding > ASCII (Plain, quoted-printable, or Richtext) > Binary (base64) • Content-Type: nature of the message > Image (gif, jpeg), Video (mpeg), > Application (Postscript, octet-stream) > A.S.Tanenbaum, "Computer Networks," (3rd ed.) p.653 3

  4. Received: from didier.ee.gatech.edu (didier.ee.gatech.edu [130.207.230.10]) by eagle.gcatt.gatech.edu (8.8.8+Sun/8.7.1) with ESMTP id UAA00818 for <copeland@eagle.gcatt.gatech.edu>; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 20:00:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bwnewsletter.com (gw2.mcgraw-hill.com [198.45.19.20]) by didier.ee.gatech.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA16500 for <jcopeland@ ece.gatech.edu >; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 20:00:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from NOP (152.159.60.175) by bwnewsletter.com with SMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.1); Fri, 30 Jul 1999 16:24:21 -0400 Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19990730202137.00672900@businessweek.com> X-Sender: mustread@businessweek.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 16:21:37 -0400 To: bwnewsletter@bwnewsletter.com (note: I was on a Bcc: list) From: BW Online <insider@businessweek.com> Subject: BUSINESS WEEK ONLINE INSIDER -- July 30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Length: 7694 4

  5. $ nslookup -q=MX ee.gatech.edu (nslookup -> host) ee.gatech.edu preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.ee.gatech.edu ee.gatech.edu nameserver = eeserv.ee.gatech.edu ee.gatech.edu nameserver = duchess.ee.gatech.edu ee.gatech.edu nameserver = didier.ee.gatech.edu mail.ee.gatech.edu internet address = 130.207.230.10 eeserv.ee.gatech.edu internet address = 130.207.230.5 duchess.ee.gatech.edu internet address = 130.207.230.13 didier.ee.gatech.edu internet address = 130.207.230.10 5

  6. $ nslookup -q=mx mcgraw-hill.com Non-authoritative answer: mcgraw-hill.com preference = 20, mail exchanger = interlock.mgh.com Authoritative answers can be found from: mcgraw-hill.com nameserver = NS-01A.ANS.NET mcgraw-hill.com nameserver = NS-01B.ANS.NET mcgraw-hill.com nameserver = NS-02A.ANS.NET mcgraw-hill.com nameserver = NS-02B.ANS.NET NS-01A.ANS.NET internet address = 199.221.47.7 NS-01B.ANS.NET internet address = 199.221.47.8 NS-02A.ANS.NET internet address = 207.24.245.179 NS-02B.ANS.NET internet address = 207.24.245.178 6

  7. $ nslookup 198.45.19.20 Name: gw2.mcgraw-hill.com Address: 198.45.19.20 $ nslookup 152.159.60.175 *** can't find 152.159.60.175: Non-existent host/domain $ traceroute 152.159.60.175 1 24.88.12.129 (24.88.12.129 ): 17ms 2 stn-mtn-rtrb.atl.mediaone.net. (24.88.0.254 ): 18ms 3 24.93.64.69 (24.93.64.69 ): 20ms 4 24.93.64.61 (24.93.64.61 ): 17ms 5 24.93.64.57 (24.93.64.57 ): 25ms 6 sgarden-sa-gsr.carolina.rr.com. (24.93.64.30 ): 26ms 7 roc-gsr-greensboro-gsr.carolina. (24.93.64.17 ): 29ms 8 24.93.64.45 (24.93.64.45 ): 38ms 9 sjbrt01-vnbrt01.rr.com. (24.128.6.6 ): 41ms 10 pnbrt01-vnbrt01.rr.com. (24.128.6.85 ): 42ms 11 p217.t3.ans.net. (192.157.69.52 ): 51ms 12 h13-1.t32-0.new-york.t3.ans.net. (140.223.33.21 ): 49ms 13 f0-0.cnss33.new-york.t3.ans.net. (140.222.32.193 ): 53ms 14 s0.enss3339.t3.ans.net. (199.222.77.70 ): 61ms 15 * * * 16 * * * 7

  8. Security Services for Email Privacy - only for intended recipient Authentication - confidence in ID of sender Integrity - assurance of no data alteration Non-repudiation - proof that sender sent it Proof of submission - was sent to email server Proof of delivery - was received by addressee Message flow confidentiality - no one can know a message was sent (anti-traffic analysis) 8

  9. Anonymity - sender's ID hidden Containment - message forwards to limited area Audit - events recorded Accounting - user statistics for allocating costs Self-destruct - can not forward or store Message sequence integrity - all messages arrived in correct order 9

  10. Privacy Establishing Keys • Public Key Certification • Exchange Public Keys Multiple Recipients • Encrypt message m with session key, S • Encrypt S with each recipient's key • Send: {S; Kbob}, {S; Kann}, ... , {m; S} Authentication of Source • Hash (MD4, MD5, SHA1) of message, encrypt with private key (provides ciphertext/plaintext pair) • Secret Key K: MIC is hash of K+m, or CBC residue with K (assuming message not encrypted with K). 10

  11. Message Integrity The source authentication methods that include a hash of the message provide MIC Non-repudiation Public-key signing provides non-repudiation. Secret-key method requires a "Notary" to "Sign" a time-stamp + hash of the message Proof of Delivery Acknowledge before reading - can't prove m was read. Acknowledge after - may have read without signing. 11

  12. Proof of Submission • CC yourself (unfortunately headers easily modified) - CC Notary (if recipient not in Bcc) Flow Confidentiality • Encrypt message and headers, to third party. • Send from the corner Cyber Cafe, fake HotMail account Anonymity • Several Web site services available Containment • Network Admin can set up filter tables on routers. 12

  13. Names and Addresses X.500 Name (ISO standard) • ?/C=US/O=CIA/OU=drugs/PN='Manny Norriega' Internet Name • m_noriega@mail.drugpc.cia.gov or manny@cia.gov • <user account name> @ <DNS host name or alias> • using the alias "mail" lets mail server program be moved from one host to another • in ece.gatech.edu domain, "mail" is an alias for "didier", also any email to "ece.gatech.edu"is ok. Old message - later Non-reputiation • Need Notary to sign hash of message, Certificate used to authenticate Public Key, and current CRL 13

  14. Compress Text Compress Image 14 From "PGP Freeware for MacOS, User's Guide" Version 6.5, Network Associates, Inc., www.pgp.com

  15. with signature attached if there is one From "PGP Freeware for MacOS, User's Guide" Version 6.5, Network Associates, Inc., www.pgp.com 15

  16. compressed, 16

  17. 17

  18. 18

  19. Radix-64 encoding of a binary (all possible 8-bit bytes) message 6-bits at a time into 64 printable ASCII characters (A-Z, a-z , 0-9, +, / bytes 65-90, 97-122, 48-57, 47, 43) pad with =. To: "Khawar Azad" <khawar_azad@hotmail.com> From: John Copeland <john.copeland@ece.gatech.edu> Subject: ECE8813 : PGP Endeavor... Cc: Bcc: X-Attachments: -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> qANQR1DBwU4D6cjDU+QAxCwQB/9IZFOIuDSIIQbwa28SQ63DDioFb4bH4bmKfopX cvdDVQ1X53fSJzyLt12RslfQToje8YxRNidYMNg1zDTT7CR9q7LRFoAwBFVtQhWJ jFNXn1+aE8oePReMi6vS0DXSSDfgDuUb1R+c8htHoeik6Oebe9R90J3d51yyCojV P2zJ2C2DyZexiudHPuDF1NIeMX582ib70PNzZhigXZcZgCbzs7ppidhHoZaoFttK goqLBFithU4ca0Xbh/11LDsUC7sY7DnAcjndFQA/7kduOATSlTYaltdaplJl7yAV OIaO+aOuXwpLfcPe9gcuVE43hAgiuy2Vxk1luc1w2MhsnaI2CACU45XGjirbKViV sQ/PJwoTI7Fwgc+Y8Swa0mqgLAeoU1gRpRnouXHrb4IKMzEKGVr6lhAxZ3oXu0h1 zUST5p7EQn/hhGHWusEeUs8m4Q7pT39uIjYDfQTfeNxfEYnI+058QZDuovunzhx7 xtT+CVz9H164uMIl4kTzjcrBqPAFN/MTAX/mJ9aAIEnaOAtO+WF/AteGda7pOhRS feBsX0/4yMH0sv+Q2xrt1AzWOjCfb6vY8nZKeafr7UTfM3P0HpvTnjsIzeehtnRp SW/pKPCTD336unzHVASqdvkC4qlxHb3By8lp6LKD2e25PSWBB+9gJrjfeI2/AGIO sxFHdOU5ycGatX4tvNNZ0aGEJsZSUCirgcjp+ChqiuTGHTAOQsU5d5z/NeuAXHBT 4WJteIrPo10vIbosI88vw5Nf5/MzCSMsIM9TfScwyGTP4B4t4laq4kywBkRXTX6Y FAW34lHwGMxSNqwrST58QVr8j9SiQ9hA2PjRzuM62edMaFOAuMvm3h2Uc6MyDKJx kUk9jmPpuNOYqguruFdngmQatL00GTBr6jk5nzphoJQxUEJA0tTZOGAy8MsK4K+z /X2P1Wgx6M3eNpSoeNF6yqPAW93rl3Bpj27T39BWKjDT2Q5rXXztq6y07oolggh6 nNTkBP17TmMXNhyeBNsUsw/bM0mZt8OrlEp6bB4hflmGC9sAP64KvnkTSK6F+QHT AHT01kWlpvJIZGKyT3PdCh9wlr1hQsUGto10t32fBGsJCXew/EClb554AnyYSzP8 KAjuw1NdKOBlze0DCiO6Z5z+DAxAwlqTxcm42tthF5zFbTk4UKV6ORzIuHmRO7xR 5Io5nlM7T11PDaWqsjLr2ttrSySzARt5fAJ9l1mOH+hSl1YebRjZPaxWw+bsYuqN a0GYr2UdwgE1u5HQuhZ+bOIbSliShfKiNuDGHe6VJrchROHnC9Po2JWAOD7wMFq6 STZ/MPGzViaCUaaWPLSKleiURUh4Ly5/LaNYkaumO9vh+241FPqtZKqRVmHRg6dY UdgoI3yfc3JrvepFQT1yeRjEVrLQiUtyhcwdVoLjofgerGAfe3YuDCxM6wLIuCf7 Ro9edu01qTiXJj25cXHxeNMdA1txLxR3ontbExow+ML5kxs= =68Hd -----END PGP MESSAGE----- 19

  20. 20

  21. PGP Certificates Anyone can issue a Certificate to anyone else Certificates can be revoked by the issuer Privacy Enhanced Mail, another standard Where PEM expands data into canonical form, • (+33% for text, +78% after encryption) PGP compresses data using ZIP(-50%), encrypts, then (optionally) converts to base64 (+33%) 21

  22. Things of which to be aware Neither PEM or PGP encode mail headers • Subject can give away useful info • To and From give an intruder traffic analysis info PGP gives recipient the original file name and modification date PEM may be used in a local system with unknown trustworthyness of certificates Certificates often verify that sender is "John Smith" but he may not be the "John Smith" you think (PGP allows pictures in certificates) 22

More Related