110 likes | 217 Views
Qualitative Verification of the Operational GFS and Ensemble Mean for 1200 UTC 13 March 2003. By: Duc Nguyen. Outlines. GFS Initialization for 1200 UTC 13 March 2003 144-Hour Forecast Control Run & Ensemble Mean Plots Spaghetti Plot 240-Hour Forecast Control Run & Ensemble Mean Plots
E N D
Qualitative Verification of the Operational GFS and Ensemble Meanfor 1200 UTC 13 March 2003 By: Duc Nguyen
Outlines • GFS Initialization for 1200 UTC 13 March 2003 • 144-Hour Forecast • Control Run & Ensemble Mean Plots • Spaghetti Plot • 240-Hour Forecast • Control Run & Ensemble Mean Plots • Spaghetti Plot • 372-Hour Forecast • Control Run & Ensemble Mean Plots • Summary • Conclusions: What does it all means in term of FORECASTING?
GFS initialization of 500 mb heights & absolute vorticity for 1200 UTC 13 March 2003 • Major trough axis extending from Gulf of Alaska to southern coast of CA • Southwesterly flow along the West Coast • Zonal flow centered at 30 N, west of trough axis Area of focus is Eastern Pacific/Western U.S
Control Run and Ensemble Spread Ensemble Mean and Normalized Spread 144-Hour Forecast Valid 1200 UTC 13 March 2003 • Major trough along West Coast with spread of ~100 meters • Southwesterly flow along west coast • Zonal flow west of trough axis • Major trough along West Coast & in good agreement with ensemble members • Southwesterly flow along west coast • Zonal flow west of trough axis
Spaghetti Plot for 144-Hour ForecastValid 1200 UTC 13 March 2003 • Ensemble members (all colors), ensemble mean (black), and operational GFS (gray) are in good agreement (which are reflected in spreads & normalized chart) • Major trough axis along the west coast • Excellent agreement of the zonal flow along our latitude, west of the major trough axis
Control Run and Ensemble Spread Ensemble Mean and Normalized Spread 240-Hour Forecast Valid 1200 UTC 13 March 2003 • Short-wave ridge along the coast • West/northwesterly flow along the West Coast • Small short-wave trough along 150 W, where verification shows zonal flow • A ridge along the coast with large spreads indicated by orange & red • Northwesterly flow along the West Coast • Trough along 150 W, location where verification shows zonal flow
Spaghetti Plot for 240-Hour ForecastValid 1200 UTC 13 March 2003 • 564-dm for control run & ensemble mean agree with few of the ensemble members • 522-dm for control run & ensemble mean are out of sink with ensemble members • Weak trough axis along West Coast • A suggestion for zonal flow, west of trough axis along the West Coast
Control Run and Ensemble Spread Ensemble Mean and Normalized Spread 372-Hour Forecast Valid 1200 UTC 13 March 2003 • An intensive looking trough over the West Coast with huge spreads (gen. 200 + meters) • Southwesterly flow along the West Coast • Northwesterly flow west of major trough and NO zonal flow • An weak looking trough over the West Coast with moderate spreads • Southwesterly flow along the West Coast • Zonal flow clearly evidence along our latitude
Summary • 144-hour forecast:Both operational GFS & ensemble mean are verified with southwesterly flow which is controlled by the BIG trough axis over the West Coast, and a zonal jet west of trough axis. • 240-hour forecast:Both operational GFS & ensemble mean are not verified. • Operational GFS shows a stronger ridge with a large spread. • Ensemble mean is more conservative, showing a weak ridge along the west coast with moderate spread. • 372-hour forecast:Both operational GFS & ensemble mean shows different solutions. • Operational GFS was verified with BIG trough over the West Coast. Though did not capture the zonal flow west of it. It captured the northwesterly flow, west of the major trough axis. • Ensemble mean was not verified with the BIG trough; however, it captured the zonal flow along our latitude.
Conclusions: What does it all means in term of FORECASTING? • Ensemble mean is more conservative. It can capture the general pattern better than the operational GFS. • GFS is more extreme. It represents only a single & “controlled” solution to the forecast. It can either be VERY ACCURATE OR TOTALLY WRONG. • In our case, the zonal jet stream with a weak trough axis could produce more precipitation compared to a major trough and a northwesterly flow. • In general, if a forecast were made for this particular pattern, it’s more ACCURATE to believe the ENSEMBLE MEAN OVER THE OPERATIONAL GFS.