1 / 9

Information Systems Planning

Information Systems Planning. Presented by: Heidi Heppner Jon Marvin. What Is Planning?. Developing a view of the future that guides decision making today… Impossible to tell the future… Therefore a more strategic focus is taken – Where do we want to end up?

lamarr
Download Presentation

Information Systems Planning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Information Systems Planning Presented by: Heidi Heppner Jon Marvin

  2. What Is Planning? Developing a view of the future that guides decision making today… • Impossible to tell the future… Therefore a more strategic focus is taken – Where do we want to end up? 3 Types of Planning: • Strategic • Tactical • Operational

  3. Planning Difficulties • Business goals and systems plans need to align • Rapidly changing technology • Technological advances, obsolete technology • Continuous planning/monitor and follow change • Companies need portfolios rather than projects • Infrastructure development is difficult to fund • Responsibility needs to be joint • CIO, CEO, CFO, COO input is needed • Systems planning in becoming business planning.

  4. The Changing World of Planning • The future can be predicted • The Internet changes strategies. New unexpected competitors. • Time is available • IS supports and follows the business • IS & IT are the business. E-business solutions. • Top management knows best • To far removed from customers, suppliers, partners. • Strategy must be formed on the “front lines”. • The company can be viewed as an army • Employee empowerment • Better ideas, increased efficiency and higher employee satisfaction.

  5. Today’s Sense-and-Respond Approach • Formulate Strategy Closest to the Action • Planning occurs at edge of company. Up to date. • Test the Future • IS department tests future technologies. • Provide funding, work with research organizations. • Put the Infrastructure in Place • Most critical IT decisions are about infrastructure. • Creating and maintaining common, consistent data definitions, create and install mobile commerce standards among handheld devices, implement e-commerce security and privacy measures, determine operational platforms, such as ERP and supply chain management.

  6. Sense-and-Respond Cont. • Don’t plan the whole strategy, let it unfold • A step-by-step strategy is more adaptable • Guide Strategy – A Strategic Envelope • can keep your flexible planning within limits • Be at the table - IS execs must be involved. • A good CIO should attain department credibility and free up staff for planning.

  7. Six Planning Approaches and Techniques • Stages of Growth • Critical Success Factors • Competitive Forces Model • Value Chain Analysis • Internet Value Matrix • Linkage Analysis Planning

  8. CLJ: Infrastructure-related problems • Limited funding • Time- 7 years from scratch • High level of IT control • Decision-making authority departing from IS dept. • What level to build at. Size of company. • Consensus between IT and general management. CTQ: Should today's companies follow the established and proven infrastructures of similar companies or should they experiment with creating their own personalized infrastructure?

  9. CLJ – Risky Business • Assessing Projects goes beyond TCO and ROI. Risk Assessment is crucial - see Internet Value Matrix • Improve project flexibility by building in ‘options’ • Which is better? Options or breaking it into smaller pieces? Any more methods for assessing a project? • CTQ - Our text suggests using a strategic envelope to keep potential strategies on track. But might this envelope be too confining? And who should define the envelope? Should it just be upper management?

More Related