1 / 27

EU TWINNING in the Enlargement Context Facts, Figures and Perspectives

EU TWINNING in the Enlargement Context Facts, Figures and Perspectives. TWINNING and SIGMA Co-ordination Team DG Enlargement 22 May 2008. Context, Roles and Strategy. Role of the Commission in Twinning. Transparency Equality of Treatment Compliance with  Policy framework

lamya
Download Presentation

EU TWINNING in the Enlargement Context Facts, Figures and Perspectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EU TWINNING in the Enlargement Context Facts, Figures and Perspectives TWINNING and SIGMA Co-ordination Team DG Enlargement 22 May 2008

  2. Context, Roles and Strategy

  3. Role of the Commission in Twinning • Transparency • Equality of Treatment • Compliance with  Policy framework • Financial Soundness & Management consistency • Non-for profit • Quality • European visibility

  4. Twinning Manual 2007 • Expenditure verification • Budgetary simplification • Public sector brand

  5. Evolving Environment • Entry into force of IPA • Reinforced Delegations in Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia • Centralised deconcentrated management • Renewed emphasis on horizontal management issues and PAR • Communication challenge • Programming perspectives • Conclusions

  6. Facts and Figures TwinningProjects in the Beneficiary Countries

  7. Overall Number of PHARE, Transition Facility, CARDS and IPA Twinning Projects 1998 - 2007 Cut off date: May 2008 / not including TWL / 2007 round on-going

  8. Overall Contracted Amount for PHARE, TF, CARDS and IPA Twinning Projects 1998-2007

  9. Number of projects per Beneficiary Country 1998-2008 all programmes

  10. Twinning projects in the currentCandidate and Potential Candidate Countries (PHARE / CARDS / IPA)

  11. Twinning Projects per sector implemented in the 12 New Member States 1998-2007

  12. Twinning Projects per sector implemented in the current Candidate and Potential Candidate Countries

  13. Forecast of upcoming Twinnings Serbia IPA 2007: 7 Twinnings programmed former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA 2007: 1 Twinning programmed IPA 2008: 4 Twinnings programmed Kosovo [UNSCR 1244] IPA 2008: 8 Twinnings programmed Bosnia Herzegovina IPA 2007: 5 Twinnings programmed

  14. Facts and Figures Member State Participation

  15. Number of TW Proposals by Member State 1998-2007(all beneficiary countries) PHARE , TF, CARDS and IPA

  16. Number of TW Proposals by Member State 1998-2007 for projects in the12New Member States

  17. Number of TW Proposals by Member State for projects in the currentCandidate Countries

  18. Number of TW Proposals by Member State for projects in the Potential Candidate Countries

  19. Member States selected for Twinning projects in the 12New Member States

  20. Member States selected for Twinning projects in the currentCandidate Countries

  21. Member States selected for Twinning projects in the Potential Candidate Countries

  22. Average number of proposals per Twinning fiche circulated • Total of proposals received (all programmes): 3891 • Total number of Twinnings launched (all programmes): 1359 • Chance to be selected: 35% Reminder • Up till 2005: 15 Member States, 15 Beneficiary Countries • Since 2007: 27 Member States, 9 Beneficiary Countries

  23. Success rate for proposals submitted by the Member States – all programmes

  24. Success rate for proposals submitted by the Member States for projects in the 12 New Member States

  25. Success rate for proposals submitted by the Member States for projects in the Potential Candidate Countries

  26. Success rate for proposals submitted by the Member States for 2007 projects

  27. Thank you

More Related