1 / 36

Seminars

Seminars. EECB seminar Thurs 4:00 PM OSN 120. Dr. Larry Stevens, Grand Canyon Wildlands Council. “Biogeography of the Grand Canyon, and Colorado River Management”. Reading. Textbook Chapter 12 and 13

landry
Download Presentation

Seminars

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Seminars • EECB seminar Thurs 4:00 PM OSN 120. Dr. Larry Stevens, Grand Canyon Wildlands Council. “Biogeography of the Grand Canyon, and Colorado River Management”.

  2. Reading • Textbook Chapter 12 and 13 • Sparrow, A., M. Friedel, and D. Tongway. 2003. Degradation and recovery processes in arid grazing lands of central Australia part 3: implications at landscape scale. Journal of Arid environments 55: 349-360.

  3. Outline • Case study: identifying communities and relating to environmental conditions • Student case studies • Productivity – plants and ecosystems • GPP, NPP, and Efficiency • Global and environmental patterns of NPP • Production in forest VS rangeland • Factors influencing productivity – fire, herbivory, nutrient pulses, etc. • Climate change, CO2 accumulation, and carbon sequestration

  4. Identification and interpretation of community patterns • Using classification (TWINSPAN) to identify wet meadow communities • Relate community classification to environmental (hydrologic and geomorphic) variables • Interpret impact of stream incision on vegetation communities

  5. Humboldt-Toiyabe National ForestCentral NevadaSan Juan Creek Reese River Birch Creek

  6. Reach-scale vegetation patterns Below-fan: Intermediate valley characteristics Woody riparian, mesic & dry meadows Above-fan: Broad valley bottom Wet meadows At-fan: Narrow valley bottom Woody riparian and upland vegetation

  7. Objectives – Hydrologic Component • Determine the dominant vegetation types & their species associations within Kingston Meadow • Examine relationship of vegetation types to the current hydrologic regime within Kingston Meadow • Evaluate any changes in vegetation associated with a different hydrologic regime following meadow restoration activities

  8. Sampling Scheme • Determine the composition, ground cover, and biomass of the vegetation associated with each piezometer or nested well across a hydrologic gradient within the meadow • 14 cross-valley transects (10 with piezometers/wells; 4 more to adequately sample vegetation) • 55 sampling points (45 nested piezometers + 10 additional sampling points) • 110 sample plots (2 subsamples per sampling point)

  9. Terrace Height TWINSPAN From unpublished data and Henderson, 2001 Stream cross-sections

  10. Meadow GroundwaterCharacteristics Meadow Type From Linnerooth & Chambers, 2000

  11. Vegetation Types- Hydrology Plots

  12. Current System Dynamics • Climate changes that occurred over 2000 years ago are still influencing system dynamics • Recent incision began at the end of the Little Ice Age about 290 years ago • The rate and magnitude has undoubtedly been increased by human disturbance

  13. Stream Incision: Causes • Overgrazing in riparian zone and upland areas within the watershed • Roads (crossings, captures) • Sediment “starvation” due to long-term climate effects

  14. Stream Incision: Causes Barrett Canyon Corral Canyon

  15. Stream Incision: Causes • Overgrazing in riparian zone and upland areas within the watershed • Roads (crossings, captures) • Sediment “starvation” due to long-term climate effects

  16. Stream Incision: Consequences • Lowers water table in the riparian zone (threshold event) • Stream flow becomes isolated from former floodplain • Development of inset terraces • Invasion of more-xeric species • Narrowing of riparian zone and loss of riparian habitat

  17. Barley Cr. (Monitor Range) San Juan Cr.

  18. Cottonwood Creek 1998 1994

  19. Gaining Systems Non-Incised Meadow Ground Surface Water Table Surface Incising Meadow Ground Surface Water Table Surface Losing Systems Ground Surface Water Table Surface

  20. Your turn… • List management issues/projects you know of in range and forest ecosystems. • Which of the ecological processes or interactions we have discussed so far do you need to understand? • Can you make predictions or recommendations based on your understanding of the ecological systems?

  21. Productivity • Energy captured by autotrophs. • GPP=total solar radiation fixed into chemical energy via photosynthesis • NPP=GPP-respiration • Textbook Figure 12.1 = energy pathways at primary trophic level. Solar energy is reflected, emitted, assimilated, respired, consumed by herbivores, turned into detritus, or stored in standing crop/biomass.

  22. Efficiency • Proportion of energy converted into plant material. Three components: • Exploitation efficiency = ability to intercept light. GPP/solar radiation X 100%. Affected by LAI, leaf orientation, latitude, topographic location. • Assimilation efficiency = ability to convert absorbed light into photosynthate. GPP/absorbed radiation X 100%. Affected by CO2 absorption, temperature, light and water availability. • Net production efficiency = capacity to convert photosynthate into growth/reproduction rather than respiration. NPP/GPPX 100%. Depends on temperature and amount of non-photosynthetic biomass supported.

  23. Net Primary Production • Difficult to measure accurately on large scale because requires measures of photosynthetic and respiration rates. • Usually use changes in biomass over time NPP = (wt+1- wt) +D + H Where (wt+1- wt) is change in biomass over time D= biomass lost to decomposition H= biomass lost to herbivores

  24. Net Primary Production • Can also use allometric means: changes in plant size; use regression to assess. • Allometry provides measure of root production (mini-rhizotron images) • Global scale • Models based on climate, precipitation, evapotranspiration • Also – remote sensing data

  25. Carbon balance • NPP-decomposition/loss to herbivores • Essentially change in standing crop over time • Important in assessing impact of vegetation on CO2 emissions under Kyoto Protocol etc.

  26. Relationship of biomass to productivity • BAR = biomass accumulation ratio • Ratio of dry weight biomass to annual NPP. • Higher for plant communities with more long-lived structure (woody plants)

  27. Forest biomass and NPP • Productivity often strongly related to soil fertility or texture (eg N mineralization rate in eastern US) • As community ages, ANPP changes: • Immediately following disturbance ANPP rapid and biomass accumulates quickly • Maximum NPP and living biomass at 50-100 yrs • Leaf biomass is maximal just before canopy closure • Older forests have lower carbon balance – decomposition and respiration/maintenance of nonphotosynthetic tissues

  28. Rangeland biomass and NPP • Higher biomass not necessarily related to higher NPP • In dense grasslands removal of dead or “decadent” biomass may stimulate productivity • Indication of coevolution of herbivores and grasses? Ability of grasses to re-grow photosynthetic tissue after removal = herbivore tolerance • Grazing lawns = rapid nutrient cycling and high productivity caused by repeated grazing

  29. Factors affecting NPP • Light, temperature • Water (precipitation, evapotranspiration) • Carbon dioxide (high concentrations more influential for C3 than C4) • Nutrient availability (see handout and text P326) • Herbivory – can stimulate (by reducing competition for light) or decrease (by removing photosynthetic tissue) • Fire – usually stimulates: release of nutrients, removal of competition for light and water

  30. Variable resources • Resources are not constant in time or space • Ecosystems are limited by a variety of resources • Transient Maxima Hypothesis: TMH • Explains patterns of productivity for non-equilibrium systems. • E.g. tallgrass prairie: at equilibrium, light is limiting (soil resources not utilized to maximum) • When disturbed, light not limiting, productivity increases to utilize available resources (hence increase in productivity with fire or herbivory)

  31. Global carbon cycle • Atmospheric carbon flux strongly affected by human activity • Combustion of fossil fuels and clearing of forest releases sequestered carbon into atmosphere • Substantial changes in CO2 since industrial revolution (from 280 ppm to >350 ppm) • Productivity of vegetation affects CO2 concentration in atmosphere

More Related