1 / 18

Introduction and Some EO-1 Lessons Learned

Introduction and Some EO-1 Lessons Learned. NRO Presentation August 18, 2003. Dan Mandl EO-1 Mission Director. Agenda. Overview of technology validation missions Overview of EO-1 Mission Mission phases Continuous improvement efforts Some lessons learned. Technology Validation Missions.

lane-pope
Download Presentation

Introduction and Some EO-1 Lessons Learned

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction and SomeEO-1 Lessons Learned NRO Presentation August 18, 2003 Dan MandlEO-1 Mission Director

  2. Agenda • Overview of technology validation missions • Overview of EO-1 Mission • Mission phases • Continuous improvement efforts • Some lessons learned

  3. Technology Validation Missions • A mission designed to flight validate new technologies to lower the cost or improve the performance of a future mission • At NASA, the future missions are all science missions but this is not a requirement for the process • The NASA New Millennium Program (NMP) is responsible for the flight validation of new technologies relevant to future science missions in both the Office of Space Science and the Office of Earth Science • Within the NMP, each technology has a Validation Plan consisting of two components: • Technical Validation – technologists and engineers proving the technology works in space as advertised • Science Validation– scientists proving the technology is capable of doing the science for which it is intended

  4. Technology Validation Missions Impact on 21st Century Science Missions NMP Break-through Nature of Technology Excessive Risk to the First User

  5. Mission Overview • Validate revolutionary technologies contributing to the reduction of cost and increased capabilities for future land imaging missions • Revolutionary land imaging instruments on EO-1 • Hyperion • Advanced Land Imager (ALI) • Atmospheric Corrector (AC) • Revolutionary Spacecraft technologies on EO-1 • X Band Phased Array Antenna (XPAA) • Pulse Plasma Thruster (PPT) • Light Weight Flexible Solar Array (LFSA) • More on website: eo1.gsfc.nasa.gov • Carbon-Carbon Radiator (CCR) • Enhanced Formation Flying (EFF) Mission Overview

  6. EO-1 Mission Phases • After base mission, three more mission phases evolved as depicted in chart below • Sensor Web/Testbed phase is active now • Virtual observatory phase is the phase in which as much mission autonomy as possible will be implemented to reduce the cost as much as possible of running the EO-1 mission • Includes semi-autonomous tasking of EO-1 Phase 1 “Accelerated Mission” Phase 2 “Public Access” Phase 3 “Sensor Web/Test-Bed” Phase 4 “Virtual Observatory” Baseline Mission Extended Mission Launch Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 2000 2002 2003 2004 2001

  7. Sorting Success Criteria for EO-1 Pre-Launch

  8. Determining EO-1 S/C Total Reliability Over Mission Life

  9. How S/C Reliability Was Determined Electrical Power Subsystem (EPS) Communications Subsystem (CS) Command & Data Handling Subsystem (C&DHS) Attitude Control Subsystem (ACS) 0.9490 0.9679 0.9535 0.9638 Reaction Control Subsystem (RCS) WARP ALI 0.9999 0.8960 0.9846 Has Redundancy Reliability @ 1 year = 0.7447 Failure Likelihood = 0.2553 = Has Consequence Category 1 from FMEA

  10. Mission Redesign as a Result of Success Criteria and Reliability Assessment

  11. Budget Realignment to Support Redesigned Accelerated Mission $600K

  12. Continuous Improvement Efforts to Lower Imaging Costs

  13. Testing Sensor Web Concepts Using EO-1 as a Testbed Operational Testbed Autonomous Coordination End-to-End Communications On-board Processing On-board Cloud Cover Detection Validation Autonomous Science Experiment(ASE) • Migration of ST6 onto EO-1 Preliminary EO-1 Autonomy Experiment • On-board planning • On-board feature detection • Dynamic SW Bus EO-1, Terra, Aqua SensorWeb Demo 1 & 2 • Uses MODIS inst center to detect volcanoes • Uses ASE to coord image collect autonomously SensorWeb Testbed • Test SensorWeb concepts on ground Smart Antenna • Ground phased array • Cell tower com to sat EO-1/ Gnd Sensor SensorWeb • Sensors in Huntington Botanical Garden trigger EO-1 image Hyperspectral Compression WG • On-board data mining • On-board intelligent image compression • Working group Livingstone On-board Model Based Diag Tool • Autonomous anomaly diagnosis and recommendations Intelligent Distributed Spacecraft Technology Testbed Funded by ESTO Funded by NMP Funded by RASC Proposed activity

  14. Sample Science Goal Monitor User page — Experiment for Virtual Observatory Front End

  15. Lessons Learned (1 of 4) • When compared to small science missions, EO-1 was inherently risky since it is a Technology Validation mission due to: • Maturing the technologies • Architectural risks • Developing the technologies • Flight-validating the technologies • Infusing the technologies • Mitigating these risks required: • Greater reserves of time and money • More capable people throughout the Project • Robust Risk Management from the beginning • Strong System Engineering is ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL in orchestrating a successful Technology Validation mission • Ready and repeated access to the best engineering talent is required – a “deep bench” of engineering talent

  16. Lessons Learned (2 of 4) • More specific Lessons Learned from the NMP/EO-1 mission: • Insist on thorough documentation of all vendor (subcontractor) tests. • Document the “as-built” characteristics of each part. • Provide a complete photo documentation of the instrument prior to delivery, with close-ups of all critical items. • Comparison of several independent calibration techniques has proved to be extremely valuable both in ground and on-orbit measurements. • Calibration of each detector of a large focal plane is a manageable job but requires thorough preparation of test plans, test instrumentation and associated software to process the resulting large volume of data.

  17. Lessons Learned (3 of 4) • Pre-Launch – Design for flexibility • Build organization for flexibility • Requirements change – inflexibility costs additional money in long run • Perform reliability assessment using FMEA and fault trees • Design S/C with selective redundancy based on risk/reliability assessment • Overstaff operations to provide risk buffer • Easier to de-staff than to gain expertise quickly • FOT used to augment I&T and as workarounds to other problems found on S/C • Use contractual mechanisms that allow flexibility in obtaining additional staff as needs arise – there is always turnover • Facilities should be expandable and changeable to the degree possible to accommodate requirements changes

  18. Lessons Leaned (4 of 4) • Pre-Launch & Post-Launch – Design for flexibility • Build Continuous Improvement Program from day one • Build capability in mission for progressive autonomy • Many mission lessons learned occur shortly before launch and during early operations • Need capability to install autonomy as operations staff learns how mission needs to run

More Related