October 2005

1. LWI Leonard Wood Institute Partnering between Fort Leonard Wood and Local and State Entities October 2005

2. Partnering Opportunities • BRAC 95 • Technology Park • Missouri’s Fort Leonard Wood Region • Missouri Technology Corporation • Leonard Wood Institute • Missouri Military Preparedness Commission • BRAC 05

3. Fort Leonard Wood 1995 • 22,000 people, 63,000 acres • Home of the Army’s Engineer School • Marine, Navy and Air Force training detachments • Over 25,000 people trained annually • Base operations budget - $65 million/year • Over $500 million/year contribution to state’s grossproduct

4. BRAC 95 • Chemical and Military Police Schools from Fort McClellan • $230 million in new construction • 4,000 new personnel Thurmond Hall Chemical Defense Training Facility (CDTF)

5. Fort Leonard Wood Today • 30,000 people, 61,000 acres • Home of the Army’s Maneuver Support Center • Chemical, Engineer and Military Police Schools • Marine, Navy and Air Force training detachments • Over 40,000 people trained annually • Major science and technology mission • Base operations budget - $120 million/year • Over $700 million in new, on-going or pending major construction since 1999 • Housing privatization – over 2,200 units • Over $1.2 billion/year contribution to state’s grossproduct

6. State and Regional Challenges • Getting leaders and other stakeholders to work together • State role • Develop a goal

7. The Objective • To effectively and efficiently develop roughly 1800 units of quality housing in the private sector within 2 years.

8. Impediments to Quality Development Rural, small town environment – Pulaski County and five small towns Lack of public support for zoning and building codes (issue defeated in 1997) Infrastructure issues – need to encourage development in areas with basic public facilities and services.

9. The Community Response • Stand up a Local Organization (11 member board): The Fort Leonard Wood Regional Commerce and Growth Association: • Cities and County • Business Leadership • School Board • Utilities • Fort Leonard Wood (ex-officio) • State of Missouri (ex-officio)

10. Funding Sources • Office of Economic Adjustment - critical to the success of the project • State of Missouri – cash match and administrative support in grant management

11. Communication was Key • Regular monthly Board meetings including information packets and “Leadership Group” meetings as needed • Finding support in the formal and “informal” power structures • Meeting the press head on

12. Growth Management Plan • Use of a set procurement process to attract a quality design firm (made possible by OEA) • A plan for the entire County – planning charrettes in each city and county • Priority Development Areas • Incentives for compliance

13. Goal of the GMP • Create a workable plan to accommodate anticipated growth and preserve the quality of life, economic health, natural beauty and resources of Pulaski County • Encourage growth in and around existing cities and public resources

14. GMP: Growth Areas • Area #1: Infill Development Opportunities (approval required - incentives available) • Area #2: Immediate Growth Areas (approval required - incentives available) • Area #3: Future Growth Areas • Area #4: Rural Conservation Areas Source: Growth Management Plan, 1997

15. New Development • Worked to involve the builders • RCGA Board approval of area and plan – Area 1 or 2 and compliance with CABO 95 • State of Missouri Provided incentives for infrastructure Development • Capture Goal was 65% - Pulaski County got 85%

16. How Region Helped Installation • Major Army concern – sufficient, quality off-post housing • Army couldn’t fix • Helped addressing other issues • Schools • Transportation • One primary interface to all communities and regional government entities

17. How Installation Helped Region • Active ex-officio membership • Provided on-post office space • Shared the numbers • Communities need to know how many are coming and their demographics • Everyone needs to know numbers will change • Publish best estimates at least quarterly • Shared regional vision • What’s good for one is good for all • Was willing to advocate at State level

18. Partnering Opportunities • BRAC 95 • Technology Park • Missouri’s Fort Leonard Wood Region • Missouri Technology Corporation • Leonard Wood Institute • Missouri Military Preparedness Commission • BRAC 05

19. University of Missouri Technology Park First Building Second Building

20. Success Story • US Army Engineer School’s Terrain Visualization Center uses Tech Park location to leverage expanded capabilities from • Other government organizations (USGS, NGA, TEC) • Industry (small and large businesses) • Academia (RAM) • Forms nucleus of LWI’s Geospatial Partnering Center MG VanAntwerp cuts the ribbon held by Joe Driskill, MTC, and Dr. Gary Thomas, UMR

21. 21st Century Systems Anteon Battelle BHE Environmental C2 Technologies Camber Center for Environmental Science and Technology, University of Missouri Rolla Concurrent Technologies Corp Environmental Directorate, Army Engineer School FLW Liaison Office, Lincoln University FLW Liaison Office, University of Missouri FLW Regional Commerce and Growth Association GEC General Physics Innovative Emergency Management Leonard Wood Institute MANSCEN Futures Directorate MANSCEN S&T liaison offices Missouri Enterprise National Geospatial Intelligence Agency Tec-Masters Terrain Visualization Center, Army Engineer School Titan Topographic Engineering Center,Army Corps of Engineers TRICARE Therapy Group United States Geological Survey Current Tenants

22. 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 • Building Two opens • Army TVC expands into Building Two 05 04 03 • UM Technology Park at FLW opens • MRP I opens • Titan Corp – first tenant in Park 02 Technology ParkThe Journey • Phase 1 90% full • Begin Phase 2 • Army Logistics Ops Center • Single Tenant Buildings • MRP II • National Center for Counter Bio-Terrorism • University Center Campus • Research and Experimentation Support Center • Conference Center • Modeling/Simulation Center • Infrastructure Inspection Academy • Classified Research Center • Leased Student Housing • Law Enforcement Academy • CBNRE Warrior-Scientist Academy • Public Warehouse • Leonard Wood Institute established • Army Terrain Visualization Center moves into Building One

23. Partnering Opportunities • BRAC 95 • Technology Park • Missouri’s Fort Leonard Wood Region • Missouri Technology Corporation • Leonard Wood Institute • Missouri Military Preparedness Commission • BRAC 05

24. Fort Leonard Wood Region • Pulaski County • Maneuver Support Center • UM Tech Park at Fort Leonard Wood • 3rd fastest growing rural county in MO • Phelps County • University of Missouri Rolla • United States Geological Survey (USGS) • Advanced Manufacturing Rolla – among the100 Best Small Towns in America St. James Dixon Rolla Crocker Richland St. Robert Waynesville Fort Leonard Wood Lebanon • Laclede County • Industry Cluster – Recreational Watercraft • Advanced Manufacturing Lebanon/Rolla – Two of the Top 2.5%of US towns for economic growth Over 122,000 people

25. Economic Development Goals • Reduce unemployment • Create/retain quality jobs • Increase population growth • Increase personal income • Reduce public assistance • Increase tax base • Redevelop blighted/distressed areas • Keep our homegrown talent

26. Fort Leonard Wood RegionVision A national center for research, education, technology transfer and advanced manufacturing

27. Missouri’s Fort Leonard Wood Region • Founded in 1996, not-for-profit corporation for community and economic development • Funded by private tax-deductible contributions and member organizations • Board includes • Local governments • Schools • Utilities • Businesses • Team effort by professional contracted staff, volunteers, and other contracted service providers

28. Missouri’s Fort Leonard Wood Region • Ex Officio partners • Missouri Department of Economic Development • University of Missouri-Rolla • U.S. Geological Survey • Fort Leonard Wood (Liaison) • Meramec Regional Planning Commission • Lake Ozarks Council of Governments • Budget • Last year $64K + $75K for Target Industry Study • This year $61K + $42K for Labor Study • Next year $68K + $100K for Branding Study and Marketing Program start • Budget will grow to support marketing and competitive initiatives

29. Region Initiatives • Region Marketing • Regional Website • Target Industry Study • Regional Labor Study • Competitiveness Action Plan • Branding Study • Direct Marketing Campaign • Enhancement of FLW’s value to national defense • UM Tech Park • Leonard Wood Institute • Regional Airport at FLW

30. Regional Airport • Joint-use • 6 KFT runway • Military flight operations • Scheduled commuter flights to St. Louis • General aviation • Joint-use agreement • FLW and City of Waynesville • Joint operations agreement • Waynesville and St. Robert • State support for airport planning

31. Education Partnering • Regional schools, colleges and universities • Crocker, Lebanon, Rolla and Waynesville school districts • Associated technical schools • Colleges and universities with campuses in region • Companies that provide training services • State education/training agencies • Ensure regional businesses havetrained workforce

32. Local Military Support Organizations • Committee of Fifty (Pulaski County) • Provides capability for rapid community support of Fort Leonard Wood missions and soldiers • Fosters close relationships between FLW and local community leadership • Friends of the Fort (Laclede County) • Phelps for the Fort (Phelps County)

33. Partnering Opportunities • BRAC 95 • Technology Park • Missouri’s Fort Leonard Wood Region • Missouri Technology Corporation • Leonard Wood Institute • Missouri Military Preparedness Commission • BRAC 05

34. Missouri Technology Corporation • Operational arm of Missouri Department of Economic Development • 501c3 Not-for-profit • Governor appoints board • Fort Leonard Wood provides ex-officio member • Charged with fostering technology transfer from labs to manufacturing • “Owns” state share of Tech Park at FLW • Oversees state innovation center program • Manages the Research Alliance of Missouri (RAM)

35. LWI Leonard Wood Institute

36. Vision A dynamic collaboration of private business, academia, and government that: • Supports DoD and Army Transformation • Enhances industry capability to respond to DoD requirements • Pursues dual use interests with other federal agencies and civilian applications • Contributes to DOD mission success at FLW and around the world • Promotes economic and business development in the region and state • Increases value of FLW to DOD and the Nation

37. The Team • Founding Organizations • Missouri Enterprise • University of Missouri System • University of Missouri – Rolla • State of Missouri • Battelle • Boeing • Concurrent Technologies • Board Members • Dr. Y.T. Shah, Pres UMR • Reginald Varga Boeing • Dr. Dean Ertwine Battelle • Willem Bakker MoEnt • Roberta Lenczowski NGA (Ret) • Dr. Linda Monzo CTC • Dr. John Park MoEnt • Status • State funded LWI launching • Articles approved Feb 04 • 501(c)(3) status approved

38. Technology Areas • Base, Camp Development • Biometrics • CBRNE Sensors, Countermeasures, Systems • Combat Engineering • Computer/Network Systems Security/Protection • Counter Explosive Hazards • Decontamination • Environmental Sciences • Force Protection • Geospatial Information Systems • Infrastructure Technologies • Installation Management • Integrated Monitoring and Control • Law Enforcement • Non-Lethal Weapons • Obscurants • Robotics • Sensors and Monitors • Simulations, Modeling and Analysis • Transportation • Urban Warfare • WMD/UNWD Protection, Detection, Countermeasures

39. Agreements in Progress • Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Fort Leonard Wood • Master Facility Use Contract (MFUC) • Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) Program • Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA)

40. MOU with FLW • Provides general agreements on principles and guidelines for coordination and cooperation • Research • Experimentation • Exchange of ideas and info • Development of doctrine and plans • Utilization of research and military training facilities • Role of FLW liaisons to LWI • Proposed MOU forwarded to FLW • Provided comments twice to FLW proposed changes

41. Master Facility Use Contract • Establishes Missouri Enterprise as an intermediary to rapidly develop and execute facility use agreements at FLW with facility users • Facility users include • Companies • Universities • Other government agencies • Facilities include • Ranges, land • Classrooms, warehouses, maintenance facilities, housing • Computers, communications systems, weapon systems, simulators • Vehicles, construction equipment

42. Master Facility Use Contract • Benefits • Fosters collaboration in support of FLW mission objectives • Gives access to facilities not otherwise available • FLW gets fair consideration of use of facilities • Reduces installation cost of operation • Actions • Proposal submited to FLW in July • FLW responded that law does not allow MFUC at FLW • Working with consultant to develop appropriate response

43. Intergovernmental Personnel Act • IPA provides capability to temporarily • Make government employees, company or university employees or • Make company or university employees, government employees • Widely used elsewhere • Draft procedures developed • Will run a pilot case at FLW to demonstrate value and process

44. Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) • A written agreement between a private company or university and a government agency to work together on a project • Allows Federal Government and non-federal partners to • optimize their resources • share technical expertise in a protected environment • share intellectual property emerging from the effort • speed commercialization of federally developed technology • Currently in development • May propose Construction Engineering Research Lab (CERL) be proponent for FLW

45. Agreements in Progress • Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Fort Leonard Wood • Master Facility Use Contract (MFUC) • Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) Program • Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA)

46. MOU with FLW • Provides general agreements on principles and guidelines for coordination and cooperation • Research • Experimentation • Exchange of ideas and info • Development of doctrine and plans • Utilization of research and military training facilities • Role of FLW liaisons to LWI • In coordination

47. Master Facility Use Contract • Establishes Missouri Enterprise as an intermediary to rapidly develop and execute facility use agreements at FLW with facility users • Facility users include • Companies • Universities • Other government agencies • Facilities include • Ranges, land • Classrooms, warehouses, maintenance facilities, housing • Computers, communications systems, weapon systems, simulators • Vehicles, construction equipment

48. Master Facility Use Contract • Benefits • Fosters collaboration in support of FLW mission objectives • Gives access to facilities not otherwise available • FLW gets fair consideration of use of facilities • Reduces installation cost of operation • Actions • Proposal submited to FLW in July • FLW responded that law does not allow MFUC at FLW • Working with HQDA to over-turn local finding

49. Intergovernmental Personnel Act • IPA provides capability to temporarily • Make government employees, company or university employees or • Make company or university employees, government employees • Widely used elsewhere • Draft procedures developed • Will run a pilot case at FLW to demonstrate value and process

50. Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) • A written agreement between a private company or university and a government agency to work together on a project • Allows Federal Government and non-federal partners to • optimize their resources • share technical expertise in a protected environment • share intellectual property emerging from the effort • speed commercialization of federally developed technology • Currently in development • May propose Construction Engineering Research Lab (CERL) be proponent for FLW