1 / 13

Physical State of the Deep Interior of CoRoT-7b

F. W. Wagner T. Rückriemen F. Sohl. German Aerospace Center (DLR) IAU Symposium 276 - 13 October 2010. Physical State of the Deep Interior of CoRoT-7b. Introduction - Method - Results - Conclusions. What we know.

langer
Download Presentation

Physical State of the Deep Interior of CoRoT-7b

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. F. W. Wagner T. Rückriemen F. Sohl German Aerospace Center (DLR) IAU Symposium 276 - 13 October 2010 Physical State of the Deep Interior of CoRoT-7b

  2. Introduction - Method - Results - Conclusions What we know • Mass and radius only known for two out of ~ 30 exoplanets below < 15 M • Radius (1.58±0.10) R  • (Bruntt, et al. 2010) • The mass challenge • 1-4 M Pont, et al. 2010 • (4.8±0.8) M Queloz, et al. 2009 • (5.2±0.8) M Bruntt, et al. 2010 • (5.7±2.5) M Boisse, et al. 2010 • (6.9±1.4) M Hatzes, et al. 2010 • Mean density (7.2±1.8) Mg m-3 (Bruntt, et al. 2010) • rocky planet? M-R Relations The CoRoT Family GJ 1214b CoRoT-7b CoRoT-7b 

  3. Introduction - Method - Results - Conclusions Interior Structure Model • Spherical and fully differentiated • Mechanical equilibrium and thermal steady state Input: Mp, composition, Psurf, Tsurf, e Mechanical Thermal ᵋ T(r) conv. conv. Output: Rp, m(r), g(r), p(r), r(r), q(r), T(r)

  4. Introduction - Method - Results - Conclusions Mixing Length Formulation • Heat flux T < Tref • Effective thermal conductivity due to • thermal convection l • Dynamic viscosity • Local Nusselt number T > Tref

  5. Introduction - Method - Results - Conclusions Internal Structure of CoRoT-7b Density Bulk composition Radius, R/R Earth-like Mass, M/M Iron-depleted Core massfraction, wt.% • Density suggests rocky bulk composition

  6. Introduction - Method - Results - Conclusions Present Thermal State of CoRoT-7b Temperature Pressure 1940GPa 7560K 6710K 1440GPa 5210K 5320K PCM (Valencia, et al. 2006) 656GPa 727GPa • Pressure-induced sluggish convective regime in the lower mantle • Substantial higher CMB temperatures in comparison to parameterized models • Mantle pressures within stability field of post-perovskite (125 –1000 GPa)

  7. Introduction - Method - Results - Conclusions Radiogenic Heating Temperature CMB Specific heat production Age: 1.2 – 2.3 Gyr (Leger, et al. 2009) • Deep interior stays relatively hot despite decreasing radiogenic heat production • What is the role of accretional and tidal heating?

  8. Introduction - Method - Results - Conclusions Physical State of the Core Activation volume, mantle Sulfur content, core 32.6 wt.% cmf ~ 15 wt.% S Melting point reduction ~3000K • Temperature strongly depending on rheology • Relatively high activation volume needed to initiate core melting • Solid state of lower mantle and iron core due to high pressure

  9. Introduction - Method - Results - Conclusions Conclusions • The mean density of (7.2±1.8) Mg m-3 and high surface temperatures imply that CoRoT-7b is a dry and rocky planet. • Post-perovskite is expected to be the predominant mantle mineralogical phase. • Pressure-induced sluggish convection prevalent in the lower mantle. • Due to the large effect of pressure on melting, a pure iron core is expected to be solid. • But: A liquid core cannot completely be ruled out, depending strongly on mantle rheology and actual core composition.

  10. Thank you for your attention!

  11. Introduction - Method - Results - Conclusions Comparison with 2D Convection Model Upper mantle • Convection pattern strongly influenced by varying surface temperature 5M Deep interior • High pressure Highly sluggish layer • No lateral temperature variation from day-side to night-side  70 5,300K L. Noack

  12. Introduction - Method - Results - Conclusions On the Existence of a Magma Ocean 1810K • Temperature variation within the lithosphere less distinct • Depth of a possible magma ocean depending on the predominant minerals • and actual surface temperatures

  13. Introduction - Method - Results - Conclusions Equation of State • Equation of State (EoS) relates • pressure, temperature, and • density • Generalized Rydberg EoS • (Stacey, 2005): Fit to high- • pressure experiments • Reciprocal K-primed EoS • (Stacey, 2000): Fit to PREM • Problem: Extrapolation exoplanets Mao H., Hemley R.J., 2007: PNAS, 104, 9114-9115

More Related