130 likes | 250 Views
Origin and Development of a Network Paper. Jung-Chin Shen. Origin of the paper. It seems that a syndication network consisting both IVC and CVC increases the chance of IPO of an invested company. Behind the statement Incomplete data Wrong measure Wrong method Poor reasoning
E N D
Origin and Development of a Network Paper Jung-Chin Shen
Origin of the paper • It seems that a syndication network consisting both IVC and CVC increases the chance of IPO of an invested company. • Behind the statement • Incomplete data • Wrong measure • Wrong method • Poor reasoning • Development of a paper is like a real option: when to exercise an abandon option is a strategic decision.
What idea can be a paper? • Interesting • Interesting theories are those which deny certain assumptions of their audience, while non- interesting theories are those which affirm certain assumptions of their audience (Davis, 1971) • Important/Relevant: so what? • Practical implications • The tension between theory and practice: • Academics is important in its own right • Nothing is more practical than a good theory • A theory will be considered truly interesting only if it has repercussions on both levels
What do we know about VC network? • Network positions are advantageous • VC investments tend to be highly localized • VC syndication networks • Risk sharing • Portfolio selection • Value-added • Post-investment monitoring • IVC’s complementary knowledge is advantageous
First attempt A mix of IVC and CVC is useful for invested companies’ performance Shift of focus from network consequences to network formation Divide into two papers: one on determinants of VC syndication network, and the other on the effects of network on firm performance
Second attempt • More: the effects of social networks (e.g., network positions) • Less: Network formation and network evolution • Research strategy: analogy • CVC, IVC+CVC, CVC • Hierarchy, network, market • Concurrent make-and-buy decision • Theoretical contribution? Empirical contribution? Why interesting? So what?
Third attempt • More: the effects of social networks (e.g., network positions) • Less: Network formation and network evolution • Network formation • Repeated ties • Reciprocity • Common third party • Research strategy: What has been ignored? • Compare interpersonal and interorganizational • Homophily
Homophily as an interorganizational networking principle • Homophily at the interorganizational level • Why interesting? • Taken-for-granted assumption: embeddedness • So what? • Target: embeddedness cannot correctly depict network structure or network evolution • Positioning • Explaining “hybrid network” • Analytical strategy • Comparing pure homophilious and heterophilous network
Hypotheses generation • Counter-intuitive starting point: • Hybrid network is costly…. • Possible candidates • Spatial uncertainty • Industry distance • Experience • Theory development • Combine information economics and network theory • Justify data and sample selection
Group affiliation around the world Source: Khanna and Yafeh (2005)