480 likes | 1.35k Views
Pesticide Risk Assessment. What is FIFRA?. Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Requires pesticides sold or used in U.S. to be registered by EPA EPA registration standard: will not cause “unreasonable adverse effects on the environment”. FIFRA REGISTRATION.
E N D
What is FIFRA? • Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act • Requires pesticides sold or used in U.S. to be registered by EPA • EPA registration standard: will not cause “unreasonable adverse effects on the environment”
FIFRA REGISTRATION • Section 3 - Authorizes EPA to register new pesticide products • Section 4 - Reregistration of pesticides by EPA to ensure they meet current standards • Section 18 - Emergency use requests can be granted by EPA for unregistered pesticide uses • Section 24(C) - Special local needs requests can be granted by EPA for new uses of registered products
EPA-OPP Standard Evaluation Procedure for Ecological Risk Assessment • Assumes risk is a function of toxicity and exposure • RQ = Estimated Environmental Concentration / Toxicity Endpoint • RQ compared to levels of concern (LOC’s)
Toxicity Tests: Terrestrial Invertebrate • Honey bee • Acute oral LD50 • Acute dermal LD50 • Residue studies LD50
Toxicity Test: Plants • Aquatic plants • Blue-green and green algae (EC50) • Marine and freshwater diatom (EC50) • Duckweed (EC50) • Terrestrial plants (EC25, NOEC) • Six dicots and four monocots (crops) • Root-shoot length, weight, visual
Other Sources of Toxicity Information • Registrant generated test to satisfy registration requirements for other countries • OECD Studies: • Beneficial arthropods • Soil microorganisms • Formulation/mixture studies • Metabolite studies
Human Health Toxicity Studies • Rat LD50 • 2 generation chronic rat • 90-day sub-chronic rat • Inhalation (rat/mouse) • Dermal (rabbit)
Other Sources of Toxicity Information • Open Literature • Internet Sources (USGS acute toxicity test database, EXTOXNET, PAN pesticide database, WHO/FAO pesticide data sheets) • EPA-OPP “One-liner” ecotoxicity and environmental fate databases • www.epa.gov/pesticides/
Laboratory Environmental Fate Studies • Aerobic Soil Metabolism - rate of degradation by soil microorganisms • Hydrolysis - chemical reaction with water forming new molecule (often pH dependent) • Aqueous Photolysis - breakdown of molecules in water through the absorption of light • Aerobic and Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism - rate of metabolism in aqueous environment with and without oxygen.
Laboratory Environmental Fate Studies (continued) • Kd and Koc - rate of soil adsorption • Bioconcentration Factor (BCF) - Ratio of concentration in organism (fish) compared to surrounding medium (water)
Field Environmental Fate Studies • Field Dissipation - evaluate pesticide mobility, degradation and dissipation under actual use conditions • agricultural, aquatic, forestry • Field Volatility - evaluate pesticide movement when volatilization is concern • Dislodgeable residue
Chemical/Physical Studies • Vapor pressure - measure of a chemicals volatility • Solubility - measure of ability to dissolve in a solvent (water) • Henry’s Law Constant - ratio of vapor pressure to water solubility • Octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow) - ratio of partitioning in octanol to water
EPA-OPP Exposure Analysis • Terrestrial: • Kenaga Nomogram • Monitoring Data • Aquatic: • GENEEC • PRZM/EXAMS • Monitoring Data • Terrestrial/Aquatic: • AgDrift
Kenaga Nomogram Review • Dietary exposure model for liquid broadcast applications • Determines maximum and median concentrations on various food items • Residue based on application rate and structure of plant/insect • Residues independent of application method
Granular, Bait, and Treated Seed Exposure Applications • In-furrow applications assume 1% of granules, bait or seed unincorporated • Incorporated banded treatments assume 15% material unincorporated • Broadcast treatment w/o incorporation assumes 100% of granules, bait, seed unincorporated
Terrestrial Plant Exposure Analysis • Runoff based on solubility • Drift based on standard assumptions for ground (1%) and aerial (5%) applications • Scenario based on runoff from 1-ha to adjacent hectare for terrestrial plants • Scenario based on runoff from 10-ha to adjacent hectare for semi-aquatic plants
AgDrift Model Summary • Model based on field and wind tunnel studies to determine drift from different application methods • Simulates ground, orchard air blast and aerial applications • Predicts off-site terrestrial and aquatic concentrations into standard or user-defined waterbodies
Factors that affect drift • Droplet size distribution • Wind speed/direction • Release height • Application method • Environmental factors (temperature, humidity)
Application Rate Koc Application Method # of applications Application Interval Depth of Incorporation Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism Solubility Aquatic Photolysis Hydrolysis Aerobic Soil Metabolism GENEEC Input Parameters
GENEEC Aquatic Screening Model Assumptions • Applications occur on a 10 ha field that drains into a one hectare pond 2-m in depth • No buffer between the pond and treated field • Runoff is from a single large rainfall event over a 24-hour period • Soil type is considered a high runoff soil (MS silt loam) • Drift contribution: • Based on contributions from AgDrift
PRZM/EXAMS Aquatic Exposure Model • Site specific model that determines pesticide load from agricultural applications • Each simulation is conducted using 36 years of rainfall data to determine variability in loading • Calculates edge of field pesticide loadings in surface water and sediment
PRZM/EXAMS Aquatic Exposure Model • Environmental fate model that simulates the process that occur in the water body • Steady state model that has a constant volume • Calculates peak maximum, 96-hour, 21-day and 60-day average. • The 1 in 10 year maximum value is used in calculating risk quotient values
Use of Monitoring Data in Pesticide Risk Assessment • Typically used for currently registered pesticides (reregistration, special review) • Sources: • NAWQA – USGS • open literature • registrants • Considerations for use: • temporal and spatial sampling • storm events vs. base flow
Temporal variability of atrazine and chlorpyrifos in water and sediment
Exceedance of LOC’s in the Screening Assessment • Request additional effects data • Request additional environmental fate data • Ex. aerobic aquatic metabolism, foliar dissipation • Use higher tier modeling/monitoring to refine exposure analysis and provide site specific exposure distribution
NAWQA Maximum Atrazine Concentrations for 40 Agricultural Sites 130 * Mortality in Phytoplankton & Macrophytes Estimated to Occur at 120 32 µg/L 110 * Invertebrate Populations Likely to be Reduced at 22 µg/L 100 * Mortality to Macrophytes Estimated to Occur at 18 µg/L * Reduction in Primary Production Likely to Occur at 10 µg/L 90 * Reduction in Primary Production Likely to Occur at 2.62 µg/L and 80 Reductions in Primary Productivity & Macrophytes Estimated to Occur at 2.3 µg/L 70 Measured Concenrations (ug/L) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Exceedence % % Sites w/ Atrazine Concs >= Y Source: Reregistration Eligibility Decision: Environmental Fate and Effects Chapter. 2002.
EPA-OPP Risk Mitigation for Fish and Wildlife • Eliminate use on specific crop • Buffer zones • Time of application • Application method and rates • Number of applications • Spray drift best management practices
OPP Endangered Species Protection Program (ESPP) • Goal is to implement mitigation measures to eliminate adverse impact to listed spp. • Currently ESPP defers to “county bulletins” • Program in place since 1989 • Voluntary BMPs for listed species • Very few county bulletins complete • Service has not consulted on county bulletins • Service currently working with OPP to review ESPP