110 likes | 122 Views
Explore how blanket banishment policies based on class membership fail to address sexual harm effectively and hinder the creation of safe online and offline communities. Adopting evidence-based policies and regulating individuals based on behavior are crucial steps toward promoting safety and preventing deception.
E N D
Connectivity as a Human Right: How Exclusionary Policies Undermine Safety Guy Hamilton-Smith, JD Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Fellow Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Blanket Banishment Sounds Sensible, But Falls Apart Once Examined • We all care about creating safe communities, both online and elsewhere • Policies aren’t based in realities of sexual harm. Leave us less well-equipped to prevent & respond to them • Platforms have a responsibility to adopt evidence-based policies that create safer communities • To the extent that people exiting the criminal legal system succeed, everyone succeeds. These bans only impact people trying to lead law-abiding lives, incentivize deception. • Blanket exclusions should be removed — regulate individuals based on their behavior, not on class membership
Michigan AG: Exclusionary Policies are Punishment, Ineffective
Michigan AG: Exclusionary Policies are Punishment, Ineffective
False Sense of Security • Source: Sandler, Freeman & Socia, 2008; Wolak et al. 2009
False Sense of Security • Source: Sandler, Freeman & Socia, 2008; Wolak et al. 2009
guy.hamiltonsmith@mitchellhamline.edu Thank you! https://mitchellhamline.edu/sex-offense-litigation-policy/ https://guyhamiltonsmith.com Twitter: @G_Padraic