440 likes | 553 Views
Perception and attention. Lecture 3 (Chapters 4, 5, and 6). Last week. We looked at the various methods and models used in cognitive neuroscience Structural methods, such as MRI and CT Functional methods, such as single-cell recording, PET, fMRI, and lesion studies. This week.
E N D
Perception and attention Lecture 3 (Chapters 4, 5, and 6)
Last week • We looked at the various methods and models used in cognitive neuroscience • Structural methods, such as MRI and CT • Functional methods, such as single-cell recording, PET, fMRI, and lesion studies
This week • We will look at • Some auditory and a lot of visual perception • Object recognition • Attention • We will also review some important disorders that result from lesions in the systems discussed • This covers chapters 4, 5, and 6 (ends at page 245)
Lesions to the visual pathways Black parts of visual fields are blind Lesions to the optic nerve cause unilateral deficit in one of the visual fields Lesions to optic chiasma cause bitemporal hetronymous hemianopia Lesions to optic tract, LGN, and optic radiations cause homonymous hemianopia Lesions to optic radiations (Meyer’s loop) cause homonymous hemianopia (quandrantanopia) Lesions to rostral visual cortex cause homonymous hemianopia with macular sparing
What and where pathways from the occipital cortex Where What
Magnocellular pathway aka Dorsal pathway aka Parietal pathway aka Where pathway Summing up the what and where Parvocellular pathway aka Ventral pathway aka Temporal pathway aka What pathway
The code of the brain • Extremely localized coding • 0000000000000000010000000000000000 • Semi-distributed or sparse coding • 0000100000100000010000000010000000 • Distributed coding • 1010111000101100110101000110111000
Sparse coding • Forms a good middle ground between fully distributed and extremely localized coding • Is biologically plausible • Is computationally sound in that it allows very large numbers of representations with a small number of units
Ann Treisman’s model of feature perception and integration • The different maps are sparsely activated • Different maps are used, rather than a combined map • Co-activation is used to code for conjunction • Perceptual confusion may arise
Desimone’s study of V4* neurons * V4 is visual cortex before inferotemporal cortex (IT)
Neurons in IT show evidence of ‘short-term memory’ for events Human Monkey • Delayed matching-to-sample task • Many cells reduce their firing if they match the sample in memory • Several (up to five) stimuli may intervene • The more similar the current stimulus is to the stimulus in memory
Neural population response to familiar stimulus first decreases, after presentation of ‘target’, then decreases during delay period, increases during early choice, and stabilizes about 100ms before the saccade
Reduced IT response and memory • Priming causes a reduction of firing in IT • This may be a reduced competition • This results in a sharpening of the population response • This in turns leads to a sparser representation
Novelty filtering • Desimone et al.: IT neurons function as ‘adaptive filters’. They give their best response to features to which they are sensistive but which they have not recently seen (cf. Barlow) • This is a combination of familiarity and recency • Reduction in firing occurs when the animal (or the neuron) becomes familiar with the stimulus • This can be an effect of reduced competition
Next week... • Memory systems and amnesia • Executive functions • Chapters 7 and 11 (not continuous!)