50 likes | 73 Views
This breakout session covers experiences, lessons learned, difficulties/challenges, and recommendations for nuclear infrastructure development, emphasizing political commitment, public acceptance, regulatory frameworks, and funding considerations.
E N D
Infrastructure Development Breakout session – Group 4 TM/WS Infrastructure Development 9-12 February 2010
Group4 Infrastructure Development1. EXPERIENCES Common features / needs – strong political commitment - public acceptance legal / regulatory infrastructure in place Georgia, Mongolia, Poland (before milestone 1) Belarus, (milestone 2) Iran (before milestone 3) Ukraine, Lithuania (established nuclear infrastructure) TM/WS – Breakout session 9-12 February 2010
Group4 Infrastructure Development2. LESSONS LEARNED Strong and steady commitment to go nuclear (political consensus) on energetic safe basis (energy security) Consider financing structures from the early beginning of the process Use experience from other countries, IAEA guides, recommendations, standards, etc. Collaborate with IAEA, etc. Do not mix technologies Go in parallel with training, legislative and regulatory frameworks Combine private and governmental interests (have clear legislation to support investment in nuclear) 3 TM/WS – Breakout session 9-12 February 2010
Group4 Infrastructure Development3. DIFFICULTIES/CHALLENGES Implementation of milestones (lack of common procedures) Lack of in/country system and structure of human resources development Knowledge management / Human resources development Political instability Gaining public acceptance Secure funding Involvement of local industry 4 TM/WS – Breakout session 9-12 February 2010
Group4 Infrastructure Development4.RECOMMENDATIONS Do not rush to implement a nuclear programme Keep the program as simple as possible Go step by step Learn from others Have supporting legislation 5 TM/WS – Breakout session 9-12 February 2010