1 / 30

Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control. Miguel Rodriguez Advisor: Cesar De Prada Systems Engineering and Automatic Control Department University of Valladolid, Spain. Pisa, October 2008. Outline. Motive Control explicit using Multiparametric Programming

latika
Download Presentation

Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control Miguel Rodriguez Advisor: Cesar De Prada Systems Engineering and Automatic Control Department University of Valladolid, Spain Pisa, October 2008.

  2. Outline • Motive • Control explicit using Multiparametric Programming • Approaches for using NMPC in Hybrid Systems • Mixed continuous-batch processes • Hybrid system • Reduced Order Model • Conclusions Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  3. Motive • MPC is used to controlling a wide range of process industrials. • MPC is capable of operating without expert intervention for long periods time. • Centralized control, Multi-level, complex plants. • Constraint handling, Input saturation, states constraints, etc. • But • MPC to require a time of calculation to find the optimal control signal. • The time of calculation is increased when the systems are Hybrid or Nonlinear. • If optimization time is higher that the response time, MPC is impossible to apply. Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  4. Motive • The main objective is find techniques that decreased the optimization time and retain all benefits of MPC approach. • Three approach are presented in this work • Control explicit using Multiparametric Programming • Approaches for NMPC to Hybrid Systems • Mixed continuous-batch processes • Hybrid system • Reduced Order Model Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  5. Control explicit using Multiparametric Programming • Linear MPC without constraints Using the steady states model and making predictions to the horizon prediction Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  6. Control explicit using Multiparametric Programming • Linear MPC without constraints Then Explicit Solution: where Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  7. Control explicit using Multiparametric Programming • Linear MPC with constraints Using multiparametric programming, z is dependent variable of the current states x and the system constraints. with the KKT conditions, we can found, of way iterative, the explicit solution into the region where it solution is valid. Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  8. Control explicit using Multiparametric Programming • Linear MPC without constraints finally, we have an explicit solution for each region CRi Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  9. MatLab V0 , IL Disturbance model States States estimator EcoSimPro Control d Set point mp - QP d, R Control explicit using Multiparametric Programming • DC-DC Converter (Buck-Boost type) Average Model (continuous conduction mode) Search method: binary search tree (Tondel, Johansen and Bemporad, 2002) Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  10. Control explicit using Multiparametric Programming • DC-DC Converter (Buck-Boost type) Controller partition with 51 regions Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  11. Control explicit using Multiparametric Programming • DC-DC Converter Comparison between Slide Model Control and mp-MPC. Load (Ohms) Ref (Volts) V0 (Volts) Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  12. Control explicit using Multiparametric Programming • Feasibility of implementing the controller. • Ts=0.1 ms • State Estimator ( 16 multiplications + 32 assignations ) ≈ 50 cycles • Signal capture ( 2 input, Voltage and Current) ≈ 4 cycles • Search of region (51 regions X 5 operations ) ≈ 205 cycles • Calculation control signal (3 multiplications + 3 assignations) ≈ 6 cycles • Output PWM (3 assignations) ≈ 6 cycles • Total of cycles ≈ 270 cycles mController frequency Standard floating point DSP controller (Texas, Microchip, etc) Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  13. Approaches for NMPC to Hybrid Systems. • Mixed continuous-batch processes • Parallel Production Line • Hybrid system • Solar Air conditioning plant Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  14. Parallel Production Line • The benchmark is a chemical process proposed by UCL, Belgium Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  15. Parallel Production Line • Aims of control • Maximize the productivity in the presence of uncertainties and disturbances. • Maximize the output flow of storage tank and hold transfer continuously to downstream processing stage. • To avoid the total discharge in the storage tank. • Decision variables • Standby times for filling, heating and discharging of both autoclaves. • Outflow of B product from storage tank (FoutST) • Non-measured disturbances • Change in the temperature of hot steam (Th) Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  16. Tcontraints=Toverlap fill+Toverlap Heat Parallel Production Line Tconstraints Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  17. Parallel Production Line (Simulation Results. Overview) • Values of the parameters of Objective Function: • Values of the weights • Almost, for each batch unit, 3 batches are predicted, 2 of them are controlled.So, Np=3 and Ncb1=Ncb2=2. • 4 changes for classical continuous variables FoutST Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  18. Parallel Production Line (Simulation Results. Overview) Controlled variable Manipulated variable Batch sequences Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  19. Solar Air conditioning plant (Description) • The absorption machine • Energy supply systems • solar collector • gas heater • Accumulation tank • Aims of control • Maintaining the chilled water temperature (75º-95º) • Minimize the gas used • Decision variables • Continuous vB1, vm3 • Discrete mode of operation (set of on/off valves) Problem MINLP very complex Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  20. Solar Air conditioning plant(Embedded Logic Control) • Fictitious variable u to represent the energy supply to the plant • Definition of a set of rules • Integration of the rules and the fictitious variable • Solution of the associated optimization problem every sampling period • Objective function Embedded logic control rules of Operation Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  21. Solar Air conditioning plant(Controller implementation) Sequential approach to dynamic optimization Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  22. Solar Air conditioning plant(Results) • Simulation results Controlled variable Manipulated variables Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  23. Solar Air conditioning plant(Results) • Test real plant Controlled variable Manipulated variables Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  24. A + B → C Reduced Order Model (The open plate reactor) Controlled variables: γ conversion Titemperature along the reactor Manipulated variables: uB1, uB2, feed flows rates of B TfeedA, temperature of reactant A, Tcool the cooling temperature. It combines heat exchanger and micro-reactor: more efficient but more difficult to control

  25. The open plate reactor(Dynamics and Aims) Start-up of the plate reactor avoiding ‘hot spots’ Highly non-linear distributed process Aim: Finding a reduced dynamic model that facilitates the use of NMPC

  26. The open plate reactor(Proper Orthogonal Decomposition POD) DFM A field x can be represented as a complete series of orthonormal globally defined functions i POD A projection is made on a subspace retaining % of the energy of the signals, allowing to obtain a model with a smaller number of ODE’s

  27. The open plate reactor (NMPC) NMPC based on continuous time formulation with the POD model and a sequential approach for the NLP problem Results of the reactor start-up Inputs Outputs

  28. Conclusions • Approaches to apply NMPC in Fast-System and hybrid system have been presented. • Transformation of problem discrete variables to Continuous variables. • To use NLP approach to solver Mixed integer no linear problem. • A study of feasibility to implementing mp-MPC in mcontrollers has been presented. Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  29. Reference • M. Rodríguez, D. Sarabia, and C. de Prada: Hybrid Predictive Control of a Simulated Chemical Plant. Taming Heterogeneity and Complexity of Embedded Control Systems, International Scientific & Technical Encyclopedia (ISTE), London, Editors: F. Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue, S. Laghrouche, A. Loria and E. Panteley, pp. 617-634, 2007 • M. Rodríguez, C. De Prada, F. Capraro, S. Cristea, and R. M. C. De Keyser: Hybrid Predictive Control of a Solar Air Conditioning Plant. 17th IFAC World Congress, Seoul, Korea, 2008. • D. Sarabia, C. de Prada, and S. Cristea: A Mixed Continuous-Batch Process: Implementation of Hybrid Predictive Controllers. Proc. 7th IFAC Symp. on Advances in Control Education, 2006, Paper-ID: 148. • M. Rodríguez, C. de Prada, A. A. Alonso, C. Vilas and M. García: A nonlinear model predictive controller for the start-up of a open plate reactor, International Workshop on Assessment and Future Directions Of Nonlinear Model Predictive Control, Pavia, Italy, 2008. Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

  30. Questions? • Thank you. Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control

More Related