1 / 47

Koc School JMUN 2010

Koc School JMUN 2010. Friday and Saturday, March 12 th – 13th. Who will take part?. BISI is representing two countries ( delegations ). In each delegation, you will be working in a team of 3 . There will be 3 teams per delegation. Total: 6 teams, 18 debaters.

lave
Download Presentation

Koc School JMUN 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Koc School JMUN 2010 Friday and Saturday,March 12th – 13th

  2. Who will take part? • BISI is representing two countries (delegations). • In each delegation, you will be working in a team of 3. • There will be 3 teams per delegation. Total: 6 teams, 18 debaters.

  3. Which two countries will we be representing? The United States Lebanon

  4. What will we be debating? You will be debating the issues related to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) These are goals that the UN set in 1990. Their aim is to create a better deal for developing countries.

  5. Which of the MDGs will each team debate? • Within your delegation, each team will be in a different committee. • Each committee will deal with a different MDG. • You will be arguing for or against an issue within your committee.

  6. The United States: Team 1: Combating HIV / AIDS Team 2: Global Partnership (how countries work together) Team 3: Environmental Sustainability

  7. Lebanon: Team 1: Eradicate extreme poverty Team 2: Achieve universal education Team 3: Reduce child mortality

  8. Who will we be up against? • You will be debating against another school, representing another country. • You will be debating a resolution. • E.g. ‘All member countries must use 5% of their GDP on initiatives to combat the spread of HIV’ • One side will be for, one side will be against the resolution.

  9. Round 1 opponents: USA • HIV / diseases: NIGERIA • Global partnership: RUSSIA • Environment: CHINA

  10. Round 1 opponents: Lebanon • Poverty debate: NIGERIA • Education debate: GABON • Child Mortality: BRAZIL

  11. What are the topics of the Security Council debates? • Like the real U.N., the JMUN Security Council will debate the most urgent current affairs in the world at the moment. • However, unlike the real Security Council, which has a fixed membership, ANY of the winners of the 2nd round can take part in the JMUN debates.

  12. Security Council Topics: 1st round • The US should remove all troops from Afghanistan. • More developed nations have more responsibility to reduce carbon footprint than less developed nations.

  13. Security Council Topics: 2nd round 3. The Palestine National Authority should be recognised by the UN as a country. 4. All member nations must provide basic healthcare for all their citizens.

  14. Security Council Topics: final round Governments should be allowed to use torture to obtain information from suspected terrorists.

  15. So, how many debates will I need to prepare for? • Everyone will be part of at least 1 debate. • If your team wins all rounds, it may take part in 5 debates! • Obviously, you need to be well prepared for your 2 MDG debate topics… • But you also need to research 3 of the SC topics. Be prepared to WIN!

  16. What roles will we have in our teams? Proposer Seconder Speaker for the rebuttal

  17. When will we know whether we will be arguing for or against a resolution? • 10 minutes before the start of the debate! • It will be decided by a tried and tested procedure: flipping a coin. • So you MUST research both sides of the debate before the tournament.

  18. What job will the Ambassador do? • Each country will have an Ambassador. • The Ambassador will deliver a 2 minute (aprox) speech at the opening of the conference. • NO POWERPOINTS!!!

  19. How should I prepare? • Choose your country (USA or Lebanon) • Do some basic research on the background of that country • Find out the issues you will be debating. • Research these in detail. • Be present at all JMUNs to brush up your debating skills.

  20. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.htmlhttps://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html • http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/country_profiles/1217752.stm

  21. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/le.htmlhttps://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/le.html • http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/country_profiles/791071.stm

  22. U.S.A • Ambassador: Noah • Team 1 (HIV Aids) –David, Carmelo, William • Team 2 (Global partnership) – Sven, Deema, Kaan • Team 3 (Environmental sustainability) – Noah, Vishwesh, Chris

  23. Lebanon • Ambassador: Hatau • Team 1 (Poverty) –Erol, Derin • Team 2 (Universal education)- Hatau, Anahita, Sophie • Team 3 (Child mortality) – Ashley, Nour, Arzu

  24. JMUN 2010January 22nd • Presentation: Raghad • Security Council (SC) debate: recognition of P.N.A. • Debating feedback

  25. SC Round II debate: • The Palestine National Authority should be recognized by the UN as a country. • Education team (Hatau, Sophie, Anahita) • Child Mortality team (Ashley, Arzu, Nour) • Poverty (Fabian, Victor, Erol)

  26. Research sites: • http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/country_profiles/803257.stm • http://www.globalpolicy.org/security-council/index-of-countries-on-the-security-council-agenda/israel-palestine-and-the-occupied-territories.html • http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusRel.asp?infocusID=70&Body=Palestin&Body1=

  27. Recognition of the P.N.A For: • Palestinian people have a President and an elected government – why not their own state? • Israel is recognised and yet it has captured and illegally settled Palestinian territory • PNA has offered peace talks but Israel is obstructing the process by illegal occupation • Recognised already by more than 100 countries • Already has the right to co-sponsor resolutions and sit in on General Assembly – why not the next step? • The PNA is NOT the same as Hamas (political wing of • The UN originally divided up the Palestinian territories (in 1947). This led to decades of conflict in which Palestinian lives were lost. It has a moral obligation to give Palestinians their own state. • If the state is not created, there will be chaos in the region.

  28. Recognition of P.N.A Against: • Peace talks with Israel must be resumed first. There must be a negotiated settlement before ideas about statehood can be discussed. • It’s too soon. A two-state solution is the long-term goal, but can’t be achieved now. • If official status is given to the PNA, it will just antagonise Israel and make future negotiations even harder. • Israel might react by annexing more Palestinian territory. This could escalate into warfare, making peace talks impossible. • The main party in government in Gaza, Hamas, is classified as a terrorist group by many countries. Its charter calls for the destruction of Israel. How do we know that Hamas won’t take over the PNA from the moderate President MahmoodAbbas? • The UN helped create Israel after the Holocaust, as a homeland for Jews. It has a moral obligation towards Israel as a nation. How can it recognise leaders connected to a party that denies Israel’s right to exist?

  29. JMUN 2010January 29th • Team debates: Afghanistan • Universal healthcare (re-match)

  30. SC Round I debate: The United States should remove all troops immediately from Afghanistan. • HIV Aids team (David, Carmelo, William) • Education team (Hatau, Sophie, Anahita) • Poverty (Fabian, Derin, Erol)

  31. Research sites: • http://www.globalpolicy.org/security-council/index-of-countries-on-the-security-council-agenda/afghanistan.html • http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1529573111 (Video link. If it doesn’t work, go to Channel Four news and search for Afghanistan London Conference) • http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/afghanistan

  32. The United States should remove all troops immediately from Afghanistan. In favour: • Public opinion in the US is behind withdrawing from Afghanistan • The sacrifice has been too great (955 US service men and women)– and for what? • The US is in the middle of a recession. Why should there be more public spending on this conflict? (It has already cost USD 300 billion; USD 3,947 per American family.) • Troops already there for 8 years which shows that the war is unwinnable. The Taliban can’t be defeated by foreign troops; there must be a home-grown militia • The ‘puppet’ government installed the West is thoroughly corrupt, showing that any Western model of democracy just doesn’t work in Afghanistan • US foreign policy should not be about ‘nation building’.

  33. The United States should remove all troops immediately from Afghanistan. Against: • Afghanistan is too unstable. If troops leave, there will be outright chaos. Afghani security forces do not yet have the capacity to take over. • 68% of Afghanis want US troops to stay • Will all those soldiers have died in vain? • Can’t allow the Taliban to take control or the whole region will be destabilised. It has already infiltrated Pakistan • Efforts to stop opium production will be lost if troops are withdrawn now • Gains in women’s rights will be also be lost • Osama Bin Laden still not captured – work unfinished (a victory for al Qaida)

  34. SC Round II debate: • All member nations must provide basic healthcare for all of their citizens. • Global Partnership team (Sven, Deema, Kaan) • Environment team (Chris, Noah, Vishwesh) • HIV Aids team (David, Carmelo, William)

  35. Universal healthcare http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debate:_Single-payer_universal_health_care Background: • Universal healthcare first implemented by Bismarck in 1880s • First officially used as a national system by UK in 1948 • US is the only wealthy, developed nation without a system of universal health care.

  36. The principles behind the debate • What’s the role of government? To intervene and regulate? Or to allow citizens and private companies to do as they see fit? • Healthcare: a right or privilege? E.g. does a smoker have the right to treatment provided by taxpayers’ money? • Are competition for customers and healthcare compatible?

  37. All member nations must provide basic healthcare for all of their citizens. In favour: • Creates universal, democratic standard of care • It’s a basic human right, recognised under international law • It’s a legitimate burden on the taxpayer (like funding education or road safety) • Private healthcare companies work for profit and put patients’ lives at risk • Vulnerable people exploited by private insurers who pay a high price for their health care plans but receive little protection • High costs of insurance means that millions go without it (40 million in US) – not out of choice, but for economic reasons • Economic argument: a healthy workforce means more productivity • The state would have more bargaining power with big drug companies so health costs for individuals would be lower

  38. All member nations must provide basic healthcare for all of their citizens. Against: • To say universal healthcare is ‘free’ is a myth; actually people pay through their taxes • Universal coverage takes away choice. If you can afford to, why not pay for better coverage? • Leads to over-use of medical resources by people not really in need – and everyone pays for them • Universal healthcare = a poorer service (long waiting lists, ‘postcode lottery’) • Creates a big, inefficient bureaucracy (middle management and pen-pushers) • In LEDCs: possibility of greater corruption • Lower profit margins would mean less innovation in drug companies. • The thin end of the wedge – socialism in disguise!!!

  39. SC Round I debate: More developed nations have a greater responsibility towards reducing carbon footprints than lesser developed countries. • Child Mortality team (Ashley, Arzu, Nour) • Global Partnership team (Sven, Deema, Kaan) • Environment team (Chris, Noah, Vishwesh)

  40. MEDCs have a greater responsibility: • World’s richest countries are still biggest carbon emitters (notwithstanding rise of China) • MEDCs emit more per capita (20t in US) than LEDCs (less than 4t in India). Therefore there is an individual responsibility to cut emissions. • Historical responsibility. Massive emissions of CO2 since Industrial revolution (250 years’ carbon debt) • Great wealth and high living standards of MEDCs only achieved through fossil-based economies; therefore hypocritical to expect LEDCs to limit growth. • MEDCs have technological capacity to make the change to green economies. Must offer a model to LEDCs. • More money available in MEDCs to fight climate change. • Consumerism and luxury enjoyed by MEDCs has greater impact than population growth in LEDCs. Large % of developing world uses all its resources in subsistence living.

  41. Responsibility is not only that of MEDCs: • ‘Blame game’ distracts from real thinking on how to solve the (global) crisis. Attention must be on finding solutions, not attributing blame. • Population growth means if LEDCs are allowed to increase per capita emissions, it will cancel out the effect of MEDCs reductions • Countries that emit the most – developed or developing – should be most obliged to act. China is now an industrialising nation. • Industrialised nations cannot be held historically accountable -the consequence of emissions was not known 250 yrs ago. • Developing nations also in the G8 (Brazil, China, India) are also obliged to show leadership to their neighbours. They are wealthy enough to lead on climate change. • MEDCs are typically more energy efficient than MEDCs and are already converting to green energy. No obligation beyond this. • The wealth in developed nations runs the global economy; a slowing of economic growth in MEDCs would cause everyone to suffer.

  42. For issues in general: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ http://www.un.org/en/index.shtml For individual committee topics: Unicefhttp://www.unicef.org/mdg/ Environment http://www.unep.org/MDGs/ Health http://www.who.int/mdg/en/ Hunger http://www.wfp.org/hunger/faqs

More Related