1 / 7

National Sexuality Education Standards: Can their current value be enhanced?

National Sexuality Education Standards: Can their current value be enhanced?. Dan Dowhower. Introduction. December of 2008, forty experts a two-day meeting = National Sexuality Education Standards

lave
Download Presentation

National Sexuality Education Standards: Can their current value be enhanced?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National Sexuality Education Standards: Can their current value be enhanced? Dan Dowhower

  2. Introduction • December of 2008, forty experts a two-day meeting = National Sexuality Education Standards • Essential minimum, core content for sexuality education that is developmentally and age-appropriate for students in grades Kindergarten through grade 12 • Content and skills subject areas of Anatomy and Physiology, Puberty and Adolescent Development, Identity, Pregnancy and Reproduction, Sexually Transmitted Diseases and HIV, Healthy Relationships, and Personal Safety . • A median total of 17.2 hours is devoted to instruction in HIV, pregnancy and STD prevention: 3.1 hours in elementary, 6 hours in middle and 8.1 hours in high school.  

  3. Areas of Concern • Utilizing individual level theory that assumes adolescents have the motivation and opportunity to reproduce these behaviors outside of the school setting • Present standards generally subscribe to a rational model of decision-making and assume all individuals respond similarly to the same kind of messages • Standards place the complete onus of responsibility on the school system for teaching sexuality education and discount the value of family and community involvement • Standards are written as a one size-fits-all

  4. Scope of Problem • 1 in 16 black men and 1 in 30 black women will be diagnosed with HIV infection over the course of their lifetime (CDC, 2010) • African Americans account for only 13.4% of the U.S. population. • Black teens (13-19) account for 69% of the 38% of infected African American. • Current research efforts demonstrate that social norms, social networks and gender roles need to be address to mitigate the impact of this epidemic • The current standards are a silo and only address the epidemic unidimensionally. • As one begins to unpack how HIV infection is distributed within the black community it is clear that interventions will have to be multi-level and tailored

  5. So where do we go from here? • Triadic Theory of Influence – overlay a new theoretical framework to enhance current effort • Recognize the full context of health behavior • Individual Stream: • Go beyond the function of sexuality and understand the role of sex for adolescents • Social Stream: • Family – a major role in adolescent lives • Peer – support the role of sex • Role Models are highly valued • Cultural Stream • Religion – highly influential but variable • Oppression and Discrimination – has been argued to influence role of sex • Policy – a general influence due to it’s great variability across states

  6. A Triadic Set of Standards • Development of translation plan • Minimum standards for school curricula • Minimum standards for family, peer and community engagement • Minimum standards for policy and recognition of critical extraneous variables such as oppression and discrimination

  7. Examples of State Policy Variablity • According to the Guttamacher Institute (2012), there is great variability across state policy and requirements around sex education. • only 12 states require that the sex education instruction be medically accurate, • 8 states require that the program provide instruction that is appropriate for a student’s cultural background and not be biased against any race, sex or ethnicity, • 35 states and DC allow parents to remove their children from instruction.

More Related