1 / 8

Reducing Internet Latency: a survey of techniques and their merits

Reducing Internet Latency: a survey of techniques and their merits. Bob Briscoe , Anna Brunstrom, Andreas Petlund, David Hayes, David Ros, Ing-Jyh Tsang, Stein Gjessing, Gorry Fairhurst, Carsten Griwodz , Michael Welzl. summary. industry roadmap of techniques gain vs pain

lavonn
Download Presentation

Reducing Internet Latency: a survey of techniques and their merits

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reducing Internet Latency: a survey of techniques and their merits Bob Briscoe, Anna Brunstrom, Andreas Petlund, David Hayes, David Ros, Ing-JyhTsang, Stein Gjessing, Gorry Fairhurst, CarstenGriwodz, Michael Welzl

  2. summary • industry roadmap of techniques • gain vs pain • latency reduction against deployability • “A Survey of Latency Reducing Techniques and their Merits” • 322 references • available via http://riteproject.eu/publications/ • evolved from BT roadmap work, but repurposed • a company tries to prioritise the quick wins • an industry also needs to identify hard problems being avoided

  3. roadmap around body of survey I

  4. roadmap around body of survey II

  5. reduction incompletiontime case (1a): small (20kB) flow over WAN 100% datapre-fetch TLP DCTCP FEC/TCP ECN+AQM DNSpre-fetch AQM CDN 50% QS micro-wave TFO TLS-FS hollow fibre IW10 straighter links RTO-restart no DSL interleave Deploy-ability 0 Very Hard or Costly Straightforward for example... all at once both ends& network both ends sender only network only

  6. reduction incompletiontime case (1b): small (20kB) flow over LAN 100% datapre-fetch DCTCP ECN+AQM AQM 50% QS TFO TLS-FS IW10 DNSpre-fetch hollow fibre straighterlinks RTO-restart Deploy-ability 0 CDN Very Hard or Costly Straightforward for example... all at once both ends& network both ends sender only network only

  7. reduction incompletiontime case (2a): large flow over WAN 100% datapre-fetch 50% CDN Deploy-ability TFO QS hollow fibre TLS-FS IW10 0 DCTCP microwave ECN no DSL interleave AQM DNS pre-fetch Very Hard or Costly Straightforward for example... all at once both ends& network both ends sender only network only

  8. reduction incompletiontime case (2b): large flow over LAN 100% datapre-fetch 50% Deploy-ability TFO QS hollow fibre TLS-FS IW10 0 DCTCP CDN ECN AQM DNS pre-fetch Very Hard or Costly Straightforward for example... all at once both ends& network both ends sender only network only

More Related