200 likes | 349 Views
Prof. M. Kostic Mechanical Engineering NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY. FUEL-CELL AND HEAT-ENGINE ENERGY-CONVERSION COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS. “ An Actual Engineering Topic ! ". Hydrogen Fuel Cell…. Chemical reaction. Maximum possible reversible work. Enthalpy of hydrogen formation or combustion.
E N D
Prof. M. Kostic Mechanical Engineering NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FUEL-CELL AND HEAT-ENGINE ENERGY-CONVERSION COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS “An Actual Engineering Topic!"
Standard Formation Enthalpy (hf) and Gibbs Free Energy (gf) for Water-Vapor(g)and Water-Liquid(l) [in scale]. 100% 95% 83% 100%
Combustion entropy generation and work lost due to entropy generation (combustion irreversibility)
Combustion Second Law efficiency (i.e., work availability, or exergy efficiency)
Heat engine, constant and variabletemperature, ideal Carnot cycle
Conclusion… ... the practical efficiencies are usually half of their theoretical limits, about 35% and 50% for heat engines and fuel cells, respectively. Still, further developments are needed to overcome fuel-cell limitations in low power density and competitive cost.
NO SPEED LIMIT No Limits … The Future Belongs To… … Whoever Gets There First
Prof. M. Kostic Mechanical Engineering NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY You may contact Prof. Kostic at: mailto:kostic@niu.edu or on the Web:www.kostic.niu.edu http://prof.mkostic.com