1 / 9

Poverty and Environment in Kazakhstan The case of Mangystau and Atyrau oblasts

Poverty and Environment in Kazakhstan The case of Mangystau and Atyrau oblasts. Basic facts. Mangystau and Atyrau oblasts 10% of KAZ territory, 5% of population  sparsely populated (2,2 ppl / sq.km in Mangystay, 4 ppl / sq.km in Atyrau)

layne
Download Presentation

Poverty and Environment in Kazakhstan The case of Mangystau and Atyrau oblasts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Poverty and Environment in Kazakhstan The case of Mangystau and Atyrau oblasts

  2. Basic facts Mangystau and Atyrau oblasts • 10% of KAZ territory, 5% of population  sparsely populated (2,2 ppl / sq.km in Mangystay, 4 ppl / sq.km in Atyrau) • Nearly half of population concentrated into provincial capitals (Aktau and Atyrau) • Outward migration until development of oil and gas sector • 85% rural poverty in Mangystau, 44% in Atyray oblast

  3. Environmental challenges • Rise in sea level 1978-1996  flooded pasture, destroyed infrastructure, salinization • Loss of biodiversity • Overfishing, invasion of external species  drop in fishery output • Damage to water supply networks and interruption of service (in some cases regional networks crossing borders)  lower drinking water availability and quality • Industrial legacy • Pollution from oil and gas industry

  4. Poverty / livelihood challenges • Environmental changes caused reduction in quality of life • Collapse of USSR reduced importance of some industries (collective farms and fisheries, uranium mining in Aktau) • Very little livelihood choices outside of the energy sector  5x drop in agricultural added value  cut living standards and increased poverty in rural areas

  5. Urban vs. rural • Oil and gas sector  oil companies employing educated people from elsewhere  villagers speak Kazakh, business and specialized education in Russian • People not “equipped” to live in the cities  the only alternative livelihood is poaching (for those living along the coast) • Access to water  shortage of good quality freshwater  water available to app. 70-75% of pop. (mainly in urban centres)  in rural areas <50 l / day (below basic health and sanitation requirements) “A specific kind of poverty”

More Related