250 likes | 397 Views
Optimal Retirement Age*. Jon Forman Alfred P. Murrah Professor of Law University of Oklahoma Yung-Ping (Bing) Chen Frank J. Manning Eminent Scholar's Chair in Gerontology University of Massachusetts Boston Retirement 20/20: Changing the Signals Washington, DC November 17, 2008.
E N D
Optimal Retirement Age* Jon Forman Alfred P. Murrah Professor of Law University of Oklahoma Yung-Ping (Bing) Chen Frank J. Manning Eminent Scholar's Chair in Gerontology University of Massachusetts Boston Retirement 20/20: Changing the Signals Washington, DC November 17, 2008 *PowerPoint and underlying paper available at http://jay.law.ou.edu/faculty/jforman.
Overview • Demography, health, and retirement • How pension laws influence the design of pension plans and the timing of retirement • Optimal retirement age from the perspective of employers, government, workers • New perspectives on the relationship between demography and retirement age • Implications for public policy • Recommendations about pension reform
Table 2. Percentage of Workers Electing Social Security Benefits at Various Ages
Table 3. Percentage of People Age 65+ with Chronic Health Conditions
Table 4. Health Problems by Age, 2002(percent of respondents)
Table 5. Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) or Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), or in a Facility
Table 6. Job Requirements by Age, 2002 (percent reporting that “My job requires X all or most of the time”)
Table 7. Pension Plans for Full-time Employees in Medium and Large Establishments (percent)
Perspectives on the Optimal Retirement Age • Employers • Use pension rules to shape their workers’ choices about work and retirement • Government • Wants workers to be productive and work as long as they can • Workers • Choosing an optimal, “economically feasible retirement age” is a complicated endeavor • Many times, people just get it wrong
Implications of Changing Demography for the Optimal Retirement Age • Why define retirement age as “years-since-birth”? • Instead tie the optimal retirement age to remaining life expectancy • Or to mortality risk. • Or by allocating a fixed percentage of each adult’s life between working and retirement years
Table 8. Retirement Age for Year Equivalent to Age 65 in Base Year(Year: Months)
Implications for Public Policy:Some Modest Reforms • Raise the Early Retirement Age Applicable to the Penalty on Premature Withdrawals • Raise the Normal Retirement Age • Raise the Minimum Distribution Age • Repeal the Age Discrimination Exceptions • Require that Benefits be Paid as Indexed Annuities • Require that Pension Benefits be Paid to Part-time Workers
A More Comprehensive Proposal • Mandate Age Neutrality • Benefits would accrue at a constant annual rate • Final Average Pay DB plans could not meet an age neutrality requirement • But DC and Cash Balance plans could
Conclusion • Tying the early and normal retirement ages to longevity improvement would be beneficial to workers, to government, and to employers • would encourage workers to work longer and accumulate more savings so that they have higher incomes when they eventually retire • would help the government raise revenues and reduce its expenditures for its social welfare outlays • would help employers stave off the labor shortages that could occur if large numbers of talented baby-boomers choose retirement over work • Changes are clearly needed, and the sooner the better