1 / 44

Credit performance of the UK SMEs Through the Crisis

Credit performance of the UK SMEs Through the Crisis . Jake Ansell Credit Research Centre, The University of Edinburgh Business School J.Ansell@ed.ac.uk Joint work with Dr Galina Andreeva , Paul Orton, Dr Ma Yigui and Ma Meng. Outline. Background Data Cross-sectional Analysis

lazaro
Download Presentation

Credit performance of the UK SMEs Through the Crisis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Credit performance of the UKSMEs Through the Crisis Jake Ansell Credit Research Centre, The University of Edinburgh Business School J.Ansell@ed.ac.uk Joint work with Dr Galina Andreeva, Paul Orton, Dr Ma Yigui and Ma Meng

  2. Outline • Background • Data • Cross-sectional Analysis • Panel Data with Dummies • Panel Data with Macroeconomic Variables • Future plans? • Conclusion

  3. SMEs - Cornerstone of the Economy Globally 95% Businesses are SMEs, 50% of economic value, 55% of all innovations EU 99% Businesses are SMEs, 68% of total employment, 63% of overall business turnover UK 99% Businesses are SMEs, 59% of total employment, 50% GDP Similar picture for Asian economies

  4. Lending in UK • Concern over lending to SMEs in UK (£991m in 2008, £566m in 2010) • Prudent lending requires more stringent criterion • SMEs more conservative in recessionary periods • Anecdotal information that some SMEs feel credit constraints

  5. Credit Scoring and SMEs • Business Managers assessing clients – picking winners (Very old model) • Business Relationship Management – plausible for high value clients less for SMEs • But need fast efficient methods credit decisions for many small businesses – Credit Scoring • More recently ‘Management Capability’ – Ma Yigui, Andreeva and Ansell (2011)

  6. Credit risk approaches Lending to individuals Relatively small amounts of money lent to a large number of customers focus more on prediction, less on causality Management Science and Data Mining Lending to businesses Large amounts of money lent to a relatively small number of businesses focus more on causality, less on prediction Finance and Accounting

  7. Data • There are about 5 million SMEs in UK • Not all SMEs borrow from banks • Database from a Credit Agency • Over 2 million enterprises • Recorded each April: 2007, 2008, 2009 & 2010

  8. Data • Financial Impairment: Good/Bad • General Information: legal form, region, SIC, # Employees, Age of Company • Directors’ Information: # Directors, Ownership, Changes etc • Previous Credit history: DBT, judgements etc • Accounting Information: Common financial variables and financial ratios

  9. Impairment Rate in UK (%)

  10. Impairment Rate by Region

  11. Impairment by SIC code

  12. Impairment by Age

  13. Initial Analysis • Cross-Sectional Analysis • Logistic Model Predicting Default • Model Used Weights of Evidence • Stepwise Regression using % change in Cox & Snell (Nagelkerke) • Interest in Performance and Variable Inclusion

  14. Cox and Snell/Nagelkerke

  15. AUROC Results

  16. AUROC Results

  17. 2Comments • Whilst R2 are low the predictive quality is high in sample and out sample • No out of time results • Modelling was naïve • There is some stability over variables or type of variables • There is stability over time – could be due to nature of variables employed

  18. Panel Analysis • Obviously can trace behaviour of individual enterprises over time • But only have 4 observation points • Modelling default – No loss measurment • Good = 0, Bad = 1 • Logit Panel Data Model: Log(Pg/Pb) = ai+bixii+di+sii

  19. Panel Analysis • Produce Cross-Section Models each Year • Using Panel Sample Tracking Enterprises • Panel Analysis and Panel Analysis with Dummy for Years • Coefficients of Model, Performance, Absolute Mean Square Error

  20. Impairment in Panel Sample

  21. Non-Start-Ups: SIC Code

  22. Non-Start-Up by Region

  23. Variable Start-Up Model

  24. Start-Up Models’ Coefficient Variable in list order

  25. Start-Up Models’ Coefficient Variable in list order

  26. Non-Start-up Variables

  27. Non-Start-up Results Variable list order

  28. Non-Start-up Results Incept + variable in listed order

  29. Dummy Effects

  30. Panel with Macro-economic Variable Currently Exploring of Macro-economic Variables: • UNEMPLOYMENT RATE • INFLATION ANNUAL CHANGE • CPI • CPI ANNUAL CHANGE • FTSE ALL SHARE INDEX CHANGE • FTSE100 ANNUAL INDEX CHANGE • FTSE 100 ANNUAL RETURN

  31. Annual Macro variables

  32. Averaged Annual Macro Variables

  33. Correlations

  34. Start-Up Models

  35. Start-up Models Incept + variable in listed order

  36. Non-Start-Up Models

  37. Non Macro-Economic Variables Incept + variable in listed order

  38. Start-Up Performance logistic regression panel model panel model with year dummy panel model with selected no lagged MV (highest AIC in each category) panel model with selected one year lagged MV (highest AIC in each category) panel model with selected averaged MV (highest AIC in each category) panel model with no lagged GDP_growth rate panel model with one year lagged GDP_growth rate panel model with averaged GDP_growth rate

  39. AUROC Within Sample models in listed order

  40. Non-Start-Up Model logistic regression panel model panel model with year dummy panel model with selected no lagged MV (highest AIC in each category) panel model with selected one year lagged MV (highest AIC in each category) panel model with selected averaged MV (highest AIC in each category) panel model with no lagged GDP_growth rate panel model with one year lagged GDP_growth rate panel model with averaged GDP_growth rate

  41. AUROC In Sample models in listed order

  42. Out-of-Sample Performance 2010

  43. Future? • Continue to explore macro-economic variables • Model based on normal • Non-parametric models • Larger range of data • Out-of-Time Sample

  44. Conclusion • There is considerable stability across models - Estimates - Performance Variables • Some variables need reconsideration • GDP seems an important Macro-economic variables • BUT need further exploration

More Related