1 / 11

Evaluating Farm Financial Performance - Case Farm No-Till Drill Purchase

This case study evaluates the financial impact of purchasing a no-till drill for a farm operation, including its effect on ratios such as current ratio, debt-to-asset ratio, rate of return on farm assets, asset turnover ratio, and term debt coverage ratio. The analysis shows that the purchase may not be a wise decision due to deteriorating financial ratios and profitability issues.

lbruce
Download Presentation

Evaluating Farm Financial Performance - Case Farm No-Till Drill Purchase

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluating Farm Financial Performance - Case Farm No-Till Drill Purchase Rodney Jones Rodney.jones@okstate.edu 405 744 6173

  2. Purchase No-Till Drill Rather Than Rent • Very nice drill, costs $56,500.00 • Sounds like a great idea, after all they can get 7 year financing from FSA at 2.25% interest. • Total payments approximately $9,024.00 per year • They save $2,250.00 in rental expenses, but they do expect repairs to increase by about $900.00 per year

  3. Impact On Financial Performance and Position • Current Ratio • (current farm assets) / (current farm liabilities)

  4. Impact On Financial Performance and Position • Debt-to-Asset Ratio • (total farm liabilities) / (total farm assets)

  5. Impact On Financial Performance and Position • Rate of Return on Farm Assets • {(net farm income from operations) + (interest expense) - (opportunity cost for unpaid labor)} / {total farm assets}

  6. Impact On Financial Performance and Position • Asset Turnover Ratio • {gross farm revenue} / {total farm assets}

  7. Impact On Financial Performance and Position • Term Debt (and Capital Lease) Coverage Ratio • (Net Farm Income from Operations + Non-farm Income + Depreciation Expense + Interest on Term Debt (and Capital Leases) – Taxes Paid – Family Withdrawals) / (Principle and Interest Payments to Be made on All Term Debt Next Year)

  8. Purchase Drill Rather Than Rent: Wisdom Of Decision • For the current size of the case farm operation, the $56,500.00 drill purchase does not look like a wise alternative • Feasibility issues • Current Ratio and Debt Coverage Ratios deteriorate significantly • Hard to make payments • Payback Period calculation (from Financing a Farm section) is about 42 years

  9. Purchase Drill Rather Than Rent: Wisdom Of Decision • For the current size of the case farm operation, the $56,500.00 drill purchase does not look like a wise alternative • Profitability issues • ROA (and ROE) deteriorate significantly • NPV (from Financing a Farm section) = $-26452.00 • IRR (from Financing a Farm section) = -10%

  10. Not Profitable, And Very Hard To Make Payments • Good thing we did some analysis and thought about this decision carefully before jumping in! • What might improve the profitability and feasibility considerations? • Much smaller or modestly priced alternative • More usage, etc. • Plan to take on custom work or have some other plan to better utilize the equipment

  11. Summary • Carefully evaluate major changes by predicting what will happen to basic financial position and performance measures • Liquidity • Solvency • Profitability • Financial Efficiency • Debt Repayment Ability

More Related