1 / 16

Stability Issues for NSLS-II Infrared

Explore the demanding nature of Infrared Synchrotron Radiation (IRSR) usage in NSLS-II, focusing on stability issues and solutions such as position and angular specifications, frequency range, and noise sources.

lcromwell
Download Presentation

Stability Issues for NSLS-II Infrared

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. L. Carr 17-April-07 NSLS-II Stability Workshop Stability Issues for NSLS-II Infrared

  2. Outline Overview: Why is IR so sensitive? Frequency range Position Specification (tighter in vertical than horizontal) Angular Specification – generally less restrictive Summary

  3. Infrared Performance Issues: Why is IR so demanding? InfraRed Synchrotron Radiation (IRSR) is used for low-throughput techniques such as microspectroscopy. Spectrometer endstations are based on highly evolved commercial instruments. Instruments already optimized for highest S/N Fourier Transform (FT-IR) interferometers (modulate spectral intensity into AC signal). Detectors achieve “background limited infrared performance” (BLIP)=> Photon Noise is often limiting factor. Spectral range: n (1/l) from 1 cm-1 up to 10000 cm-1 (1 cm < l < 1 mm) IRSR is typically 1000x brighter than standard laboratory IR source … a thermal (blackbody) radiator at ~1200K. background photon noise from 1200K source only factor of ~2x above 300K background. In order to benefit from the brightness advantage, IRSR source noise should be no more than 10X the thermal source noise. Ideally 1X. => thermal source noise serves as reference point.

  4. Michelson-type interferometers, typically operating in “continuous” or “rapid-scan” mode. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectrometer fixed mirror source moving mirror (scans back and forth) typical velocity of ~1 cm/s to experiment endstation and detector • Each spectral component receives sinusoidal modulation: FT gets you spectrum: frequency (in Hz) ~ n (in cm-1).

  5. Frequency Range Requirement Determined by several factors Desired spectral range (usually spans from 1 to 2 full decades) Mechanical movement of FTIR scanner (available velocities) Digitizing rate capability Detector and amplifier response time => Modulated frequencies span 1 to 2 decades in a single measurement. One more time-scale: sample/reference measurement. Can be < 1 minute or several hours. Result: ~1 Hz up to 1 kHz for far-infrared and THz spectral range. 100 Hz up to 10 kHz for mid-infrared spectral range. sub 1 Hz for all measurements (sample-in / sample-out). SUM: need stable up to ~10kHz

  6. Noise Sources in Required Frequency Range Typical SR Noise Sources Mechanical motion (drift, vibrations). < 200 Hz 60 Hz related (electrical pickup). 60 Hz and multiples up to ~720 Hz. Multiples of 720 Hz in RF sidebands. Note: some low frequency noise can be compensated using dynamic beam steering mirrors with feedback. RF (100s of Hz to > 10 kHz) too fast to correct using optomechanics.

  7. What motion magnitude can be tolerated? The good news: the effective or apparent source size will always be diffraction-limited. sdiffraction ~ l2/3r1/3 At short wavelength of 2 mm (2x10-4 cm) and r = 2500 cm (NSLS-II), smallest effective beam size is about 500 microns. Model: use Gaussian beam and “aperture” to determine signal fluctuation as function of motion: defines allowable movement. Assume upper noise limit of 1%, set requirement at 0.3% under “worst case scenario”. achieving below 0.1% is still beneficial. Position Stability Requirements

  8. Position Stability Requirements Optimal case: beam perfectly centered on all apertures

  9. Position Stability Requirements Optimal case: beam perfectly centered on all apertures 10 mm movement cause 0.3% change.

  10. Position Stability Requirements Worst case: Sample with sharp edge centered on beam 1 mm movement yields 0.3% change

  11. Result: For a symmetrically aligned aperture, beam motion must be kept to below 5% of the effective bunch size for 1% noise. This sets an upper limit of 25 microns and goal requirement of 10 microns. If the aperture can not be symmetrically aligned or experiment can not use a symmetric beam profile, then the constraint becomes 10 times more severe (1 micron for 0.3% noise). This does not reduce noise to background level. It makes it quite tolerable (moderate improvement relative to NSLS). Another factor of 10x smaller would improve S/N for many measurements. Source is always diffraction-limited in vertical, but becomes extended source horizontally. Can tolerate more horizontal movement (at least 3X). SUM: limit beam motion to 1 mm in vertical, ~ 3 mm in horizontal (more forgiving). Position Stability Requirements

  12. Noise Example: NSLS Infrared beamline U10 Mechanical & electrical noise below 500 Hz (could be reduced by optical stabilization) “Other” noise (RF?) at higher frequencies “Noise Floor” => intrinsic noise at detector (baseline with no beam)

  13. Noise Example: NSLS Infrared beamline U10 Example S/N (red) and Ideal (blue) Loss in S/N due to Beam-related Noise > 10X lossbelow 1.5kHz

  14. Apparent Beam Motion Example: NSLS Infrared beamline U10 Position Sensitive Photodetector at endstation, ~ 300 Hz BW EquivalentNSLS-II goal

  15. Angular Stability Requirements Main issue is beam spillage at an aperture. Exit (collecting) aperture at dipole extraction serves as limit. Typical mid-IR collection of ~ 10 mrad, assume 0.1% tolerance. Vertical may be more sensitive (downstream aperture). SUM: 10 mrad sufficient for horizontal, suggest 3 mrad for vertical.

  16. Infrared Noise Summary Noise from Source & Beamline components limits performance at most IR beamlines. Mechanical movement (mostly below 100 Hz) Electrical (60 Hz multiples) RF (multiple lines, above 500 Hz) Nothing is “magic” about IR requirements: The “competition’s” noise is very low! 1 micron position stability would achieve 300:1 S/N for “worst case". more forgiving in horizontal than vertical (extended horizontal source, assume 3X more tolerance = 3 mm). angular position less critical (several mrads is fine, plan to under-fill optics & avoid beam “spillage”). frequencies to at least 10 kHz. Existing NSLS VUV/IR Mid-IR: effectively lose ~10X of potential S/N benefit. all types of noise, RF sidebands difficult to avoid (occur at many different frequencies). optimal alignment helps, but optimization lost when beam position drifts. Existing NSLS VUV/IR Far-IR: effectively lose up to ~100X noise is both mechanical and electrical. beam stabilization expected to yield significant improvement. Users do not always recognize unusual noise. need independent diagnostic beamport for constant monitoring.

More Related