1 / 24

Matthew Martin Johns Hopkins University for the CDF collaboration

Branching Ratios from. and. Matthew Martin Johns Hopkins University for the CDF collaboration. Flavor Physics & CP Violation Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France June 2003. Outline:. Motivation Branching Ratios at CDF Results from:. Conclusions. CDF plans a rich program of B-Physics:.

lcummins
Download Presentation

Matthew Martin Johns Hopkins University for the CDF collaboration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Branching Ratios from and Matthew Martin Johns Hopkins University for the CDF collaboration Flavor Physics & CP Violation Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France June 2003

  2. Outline: • Motivation • Branching Ratios at CDF • Results from: • Conclusions M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  3. CDF plans a rich program of B-Physics: • Precision study of the : • BR’s, mass and lifetime • Plan to observe or rule out SM mixing • Measure • Measure • The world’s largest sample: • BR’s, mass and lifetime • CP Violation searches • This program just beginning… M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  4. NEW ! NEW ! What we know: PDG 2002: New results for: M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  5. What we know: PDG 2002: NEW ! Nearly New results for: M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  6. Interaction rate • Reduced to on Level 2 output. • Critical component : SVT impact parameter cuts. • 2 Tracks with Tracks per 10 µm 0 4000 8000 -500 -250 0 250 500 silicon trigger impact parameter (µm) Events per 0.5 µs 0 10000 20000 0 10 20 30 40 50 Silicon trigger latency (µs) Hadronic Level 2 Trigger: 35mm  33mm resol  beam  s = 48mm M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  7. Branching Ratios at CDF: • Compare search mode to kinematically similar mode, eg: • Cancellation: • Systematics in Trigger and Reconstruction Efficiency. • Production fractions ( ): • LEP/CDF Combined. • Aim to measure at CDF. • Daughter BR’s : • Rely on existing measurements. • Future : CLEO-C • Plan to normalise to same channel Semileptonic M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  8. Normalisation mode: • Same mode for: • Similar cuts to signal • also visible. M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  9. Important Cuts: 2 Tracks required to be Trigger Tracks. mass constrained to PDG value Reconstructing: First Observation! M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  10. Systematics: Uncertainty in due to fit. Uncertainty in M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  11. Results: M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  12. Reconstructing Important cuts: M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  13. 3Types of reflection: • 4-Prong Decays • (eg ) • Other decays • Everything else. • Normalise Reflection shape to measured • yield. b Reflections: M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  14. Effect of dE/dX: M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  15. Expected Systematics: M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  16. Current Status: • Finalising reflection model measurement for EPS • Systematic uncertainty dominated by: M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  17. Prospects for improving normalisation: Note : Hadronic Trigger Path M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  18. Reconstructing • required to be trigger tracks. • Optimise offline Cuts on MC signal, data sideband: • Isolation: • Efficiency from data • Defined in a cone about the B axis: M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  19. Different signal contributions: Monte Carlo: • Total width due to several different contributions. • on top of each other • Disentangle using: • Invt Mass • Relative momentum • PID { Kinematic Separation ← Most Important M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  20. Kinematic separation: Monte Carlo: • Choose 2 variables: • Signal Likelihood: M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  21. Particle ID : • calibrated on sample • Bachelor charge identifies daughters. M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  22. Systematics: M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  23. Current Results: Yields: PDG 2002: M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

  24. Conclusions: • CDF has robust signals in: • First measurement of relative BR • First observation of • Measurement of validates extraction procedure • Expect and for EPS • First steps toward an exciting programme in physics and physics (mixing and CPV) . M.Martin, Johns Hopkins for CDF, FPCP June 2003

More Related