1 / 15

CJCSI 3170.01 Revision Update CAPT Jeff Gernand, J-8 12 November 2002

CJCSI 3170.01 Revision Update CAPT Jeff Gernand, J-8 12 November 2002. Current Requirements and Acquisition Process. Frequently produces stovepiped system solutions Not necessarily based on the future capabilities required by the joint warfighter.

leanne
Download Presentation

CJCSI 3170.01 Revision Update CAPT Jeff Gernand, J-8 12 November 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CJCSI 3170.01 Revision UpdateCAPT Jeff Gernand, J-812 November 2002

  2. Current Requirements and Acquisition Process • Frequently produces stovepiped system solutions • Not necessarily based on the future capabilities required by the joint warfighter. • Acquisition decisions are typically made from a single system perspective, without the benefit of considering impact to interrelated systems. • Process relies on the experience, judgement, staffing and intuition of decision makers. • Lacks overarching construct for objective analysis and decision making. • Systems are developed deconflicted but not necessarily integrated. • Process lacks prioritization of joint warfighting demands. • Duplication exists between Services, particularly in ACAT II and III programs.

  3. Guidance Interoperability? Capabilities Based? JR QDR, DPG, CPG Impact on: Training? Doctrine? Leadership? Facilities? Systems Current Requirements and Acquisition Process JROC Decisions Based on • Experience • Staff Support • Judgement • Intuition

  4. NSS JPD Budget PDMs Service POMs Fiscal Guidance NMS Joint Vision Joint Strategic Review CPR CPA IPLs Contingency Planning Guidance CINC O-Plans JSCP MAA ORD ORD MS “C” MS “B” MS “A” Decision Process Today Joint Through Cooperation DPG JWCA-Based Analysis Slow Process MNS No Direct Link Service Oriented

  5. Desired Improvements • DefineHow We Fight Up Front • Focus onCapabilities vs. Platforms • ProcessInclusive of Materiel and Non-Materiel Solutions • More Joint Voice Early • Less Prescriptive Early; More focus on Experimentation • Metrics Based • Clear Tie to Strategy • Better TieBetween Event Driven and Calendar Drivenprocesses • Take Advantage ofCollaborative Tools to Cut Decision/Staffing Time

  6. Guidance JR Systems Future Capabilities and Acquisition Process Concepts Integrated Architectures • Construct for analysis • Analytical tool to identify and articulate our requirements

  7. Integrated Process Team Capstone Concept Fiscal Guidance Service POMs PDMs Budget DPG CPR Functional Concepts Experimentation Illustrative Planning Scenarios Integrated Joint Architecture New Ideas CPA Technology R&D Mission Needs Analysis Capability Solution Sets CDD CPD MS “B” MS “C” FRP ICD MS “A” • Analysis Teams • OSD • Combatant Commanders • Joint Staff • Services • Agencies • Labs • Industry Increment Improved Decision Process NSS NMS Joint Vision Operating Concepts Architectures • Collaborative effort with: • OSD • Combatant Commanders • Joint Staff • Services

  8. Attributes • Systems born joint • Anchored in strategy • Capabilities based • Speed and effectiveness of decisions • Clear participation Integrated Process Team Capstone Concept Fiscal Guidance Service POMs PDMs Budget DPG CPR Functional Concepts Experimentation Illustrative Planning Scenarios Integrated Joint Architecture New Ideas CPA Technology R&D Mission Needs Analysis Capability Solution Sets CDD CPD MS “B” MS “C” FRP ICD MS “A” • Analysis Teams • OSD • Combatant Commanders • Joint Staff • Services • Agencies • Labs • Industry Increment Improved Decision Process NSS NMS Joint Vision Operating Concepts Architectures • Collaborative effort with: • OSD • Combatant Commanders • Joint Staff • Services

  9. CJCS signed 28 Oct • Analysis Teams • OSD • Combatant Commanders • Joint Staff • Services • Agencies • Labs • Industry Improved Decision Process In final draft for CJCS approval NSS NMS Integrated Process Team Joint Vision Capstone Concept Due to SECDEF Dec 06 (snowflake) Fiscal Guidance Service POMs PDMs Budget DPG CPR Functional Concepts Experimentation Illustrative Planning Scenarios Integrated Joint Architecture Operating Concepts New Ideas CPA Architectures Technology R&D Mission Needs Analysis Capability Solution Sets • Collaborative effort with: • OSD • Combatant Commanders • Joint Staff • Services CDD CPD MS “B” MS “C” FRP ICD MS “A” Increment

  10. FCB Process DAB DAB DAB JROC JROC JROC Acquisition Requirements Future Capabilities and Acquisition Process MS B Approved CDD MS C MS A D O T M L P F Refinement of Solution Sets CPD Analysis of Capability Solution Sets ICD Capability and Technology Development Demo SDD LRIP FRP Demo Increment 1 MS C MS B LRIP Demo Demo Increment 2 ICD - Initial Capabilities Document CDD - Capabilities Development Document CPD - Capabilities Production Document MS C MS B LRIP Demo Demo Increment 3 Oversight

  11. Functional Capability Board • Membership • Flag officer from the lead Combatant Commander • Non-flag officer representatives Combatant Commanders, Services, OSD, Joint Staff and appropriate agencies • Authority • Develop functional concept and associated architecture operational views • Validate ACAT II / III capability documents • Responsibility • Conduct mission area analysis to identify joint requirements • Develop material and non-material alternatives that achieve desired joint capabilities • Evaluate proposed material and non-material changes using JROC approved metrics • Re-validate concepts and architectures on an annual basis • Prioritize requirements within functional area

  12. Functional Capabilities Board Process Overarching Policy NSS/NMS/Joint Vision CDD CPD Joint Capstone Concept FCB Mission Area Functional Concept Integrated Arch Collaborative Mission Area Analysis Mission Needs Analysis ACAT I or Special Interest MS A – JROC/DAB D O T M L P F DAB ICD AoA Ideas for Materiel Approaches Independent Analysis of Materiel Approaches - Materiel - CJCSI 3170 process Alternative 1 Alternative 2 ACAT II and below Non-Special Interest MS A – FBC/MDA DOTLPF Changes CJCSI 3180 Process MDA ICD

  13. Service Input to the FCB Overarching Policy NSS/NMS/Joint Vision Service initiated idea CDD CPD ICD/CDD/CPD Joint Capstone Concept JCPAT Stage I review FCB Collaborative Mission Area Analysis Gatekeeper Mission Area Functional Concept Integrated Arch Service Unique Joint Impact ACAT I or Special Interest MS A – JROC/DAB Capability Assessment Gap - or Not D O T M L P F Complete JCPAT Review DAB ICD AoA Ideas for Materiel Approaches Independent analysis of concepts Materiel CJCSI 3170 process Alternative 1 Service Requirements Process Alternative 2 ACAT II and below Non-Special Interest MS A – FCB/MDA DOTLPF Changes CJCSI 3180 Process MDA ICD Additional FCBs

  14. DAB DAB DAB JROC JROC JROC Acquisition Requirements Future Capabilities and Acquisition Process Enterprise Architecture MS B Approved CDD MS C MS A D O T M L P F Refinement of Solution Sets CPD Analysis of Capability Solution Sets ICD Capability and Technology Development Demo SDD LRIP FCB Process FRP Demo Increment 1 MS C MS B LRIP Demo Demo Increment 2 ICD - Initial Capabilities Document CDD - Capabilities Development Document CPD - Capabilities Production Document MS C MS B LRIP Demo Demo Increment 3 Oversight

  15. O N I J T C F H F I A E T O F F S S NO BOUNDARIES JOINT OPERATIONS MEAN INTEGRATION NOT DECONFLICTION

More Related