1 / 35

Pinning down the J PC values of the X(3872)

Pinning down the J PC values of the X(3872). K. Miyabayashi for S.K. Choi & S.L. Olsen. Feb, 2005 Belle Analysis & Software Meeting. J PC possibilities for J ≤ 2. P-viol’n & DD -allowed J PC s unlikely (reduce type size of these entries by x1/2).

lebaron
Download Presentation

Pinning down the J PC values of the X(3872)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pinning down the JPC values of the X(3872) K. Miyabayashi for S.K. Choi & S.L. Olsen Feb, 2005 Belle Analysis & Software Meeting

  2. JPC possibilities for J ≤ 2

  3. P-viol’n & DD-allowed JPCs unlikely(reduce type size of these entries by x1/2)

  4. Use e7 – e37 data(include BKS p+p-J/y) Signal (47 ev) Sidebands (114/10 = 11.4 ev)

  5. Eliminate all other factors, & the one that remains must be the truth.* Follow advice from Sherlock Holmes: *The sign of four

  6. Areas of investigation • Angular correlations • Search for radiative decays • Fits to the M(pp) distribution

  7. Angular Correlations

  8. Strategy: for each JPC, find a distrib 0if we see any events there, we can rule it out y’is 1-- example1--: sin2qKm Use y’ to check accept. y’: c2/dof = 8.9/9 qKm K compute angles in J/y restframe D.V. Bugg hep-ph/0410168v2

  9. |cosqKl| for X(3872) events c2/dof = 60.3/9 fit with sin2qKl + bkgd see 8 evts/bin expect 2~3evts/bin background scaled from sidebands X(3872) is not 1-- !

  10. 1+- and 2-- use J/y helicity angle qJ/y For the y’p+p-J/y, this should be ~flat K X qJ/y J/y |cosqJ/y|

  11. 1+- and 2-- 2--: sin2qJ/y cos2qJ/y 1+-: sin2qJ/y c2/dof=36/9 c2/dof=27/9 |cosqJ/y| |cosqJ/y| can rule out 1+- (Cl=10 -4%) 2-- is unlikely (CL=0.16%)

  12. 0-+Rosner(PRD 70 094023) 0-+ : sin2q sin2y c2/dof=31/9 q |cosq| c2/dof=61/9 y safe to rule out 0-+ |cosy|

  13. 0 ++Rosner(PRD 70 094023) again In the limit where X(3872), pp, & J/y rest frames coincide: dG/dcosqlp sin2qlp qlp c2/dof = 59/9 rule out 0++ |cosqlp|

  14. compute angles in X(3872) restframe 1++ 1++: sin2ql sin2c Rosner (PRD 70 094023) c2/dof = 10.4/9 ql K |cosql| c c2/dof = 8.1/9 1++ looks okay! |cosc|

  15. 1++ again compute c in pp rest frame compute q in J/y rest frame c2/dof = 8.9/9 c2/dof = 8.9/9 |cosc| |cosql|

  16. Reduce type size for JPC values that fail angle tests

  17. Observation of X(3872)g J/y

  18. Select BK J/yg(include both K± & Ks) • Tight J/y cuts • K± id>0.5 / Belle-standard “good Ks” • Eg>40 MeV • p0 veto (c2>4.0) • K* veto (M(Kg)>1.0 GeV) • R2<0.4; |cosqB| < 0.8 • |Mbc – 5.28|<0.0055 GeV (2s) • |DE|<0.034 GeV (2s) • E7  E37

  19. M(g J/y) BKcc1; cc1g J/y X signal Region ±32 MeV X(3872)? M(gJ/y)

  20. Expand cc1 region Fit to determine sM(gJ/y) =10.7 MeV |M(gJ/y) – mcc1| < 25 MeV (± 2.4s) Use these fits to get means & sigmas for Mbc and DE Nev(cc1) = 653 ± 26

  21. M(g J/y) in X(3872) region ±32 MeV ±32 MeV ±32 MeV Use this fit to get Efact for ARGUS sideband X(3872) Nev(X3872) = 13.4 ± 4.4 No signif. peaking bkgnd scaled fit: 1.0 ± 2.1 evts Signif =  2lnL(1.0) -2lnL(13.4) = 5.1 s

  22. Br(Xg J/y) determination Br(Xg J/y) Br(Xp+p-J/y) = Nev(Xg J/y) Nev(cc1g J/y) Nev(Xp+p-J/y) Nev(y’ p+p-J/y) e(cc1g J/y) e(y’g J/y) e(y’ p+p-J/y) e(Xp+p-J/y) Br(BKcc1)Br(cc1g J/y) Br(BKy’) Br(y’p+p-J/y)   from PDG 1.02 ± 0.22 data: 0.30 ± 0.11 ~1.02± 0.10 = 0.30 ± 0.11 ± 0.06 (Previous 90% CL upper limit was <0.4)

  23. Evidence for C=+1is becoming overwhelming • Bg J/y only allowed for C=+1 • same for B”w”J/y (reported earlier) • M(pp) for Xp+p-J/y looks like a r XppJ/y (pp-J/y in an S-wave) c2/dof=63/39 XrJ/y (r-J/y in an S-wave) c2/dof=35/39

  24. C = -1 is ruled outreduce typesize of C=-1 entries

  25. Remaining states • 1++r & J/y in an S-wave • 2-+ “ “ a P-wave

  26. Fits to the M(pp)Distribution J/y XrJ/y in P-wave has a q*3 centrifugal barrier q* X r q*

  27. M(pp) can distinguish r-J/y S- & P-waves P-wave: c2/dof = 80/39 S-wave: c2/dof = 35/39 (CL=0.014%) (CL= 67%) q* roll-off q*3 roll-off Shape of M(pp) distribution near the kinematic limit favors S-wave

  28. r-J/y in a P-wave is unlikelyreduce type-size of all J-+ entries

  29. “The one which remains:” 1++ (passes all the tests) c2/dof = 10.4/9 c2/dof = 35/39 |cosql| M(p+p-) c2/dof = 8.1/9 • & consistent with • observations of: • X g J/y • X”w” J/y |cosc|

  30. Could the X(3872) be the cc1’ ? • Mass is way off: 3872 vs 3929  3990 MeV • Br(Xg J/y) = 0.3 is much too small theory range Rough expectation for pure charmonium: Barnes, Godfrey hep-ph/0311162 G(23P1 g J/y) ~ 11 keV G(23P1 ppJ/y) ~ G(y’ po J/y) ~ 0 (0.3 keV) ~30 isospin violating we measure 0.3; two orders-of-magnitude smaller; cc1’ component of the X(3872) must be small

  31. Summary • We learn a lot from angular distribs with ~50 evts • Rule out 0 -+, 0++ , 1 -- and 1+-; 2– is unlikely (CL~0.16%) • BgJ/y (plus “w”J/y & M(pp)) rules out all C=-1 • M(pp) favors S-wave r-J/y (P-wave CL=0.014%) • Rules out 2-+, 1-+ & 0-+ • Only 1++ passes all tests • angular distributions & M(pp) fitted well • cc1’ assignment unlikely (Br(gJ/y) is too small) • DD* molecule models favor 1++ • Tornqvist hep-ph/0308277 • Swanson PLB588, 189(2004)

  32. plan • Generate MC for each JPC • compare MC distributions with data • Search for Xgy’ (theory for cc1’: ~ 6x gJ/y ) • PRD on X(3872) properties? • angular studies • other decay modes • XgJ/y  include e39 data? • XDD, DD* ?? , separate paper? • X3p J/y  include e39 data? • M(pp) fits

  33. Back-up slides

  34. Q: why not do 2-d fits for angular distributions? A: We are not measuring parameters, we doing hypothesis testing, & so, we need a binned c2. With < 50 events, 2-dim binning with reasonable bin sizes will have ≤1event/bin.

  35. Q: Is the M(gJ/y) look-back plot consistent with a 10.5 evt XgJ/y signal? A: YES 13.4 evt Signal (yield fixed at value from Mbc-DE fit; s scaled from cc1gJ/y peak)

More Related